Quality assurance of add-on testing in plasma samples: stability limit for 29 biochemical analytes.

Introduction: Clinical laboratories should guarantee sample stability in specific storage conditions for further analysis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the stability of plasma samples under refrigeration for 29 common biochemical analytes usually ordered within an emergency context, in order to determine the maximum allowable period for conducting add-on testing. Materials and methods: A total of 20 patient samples were collected in lithium heparin tubes without gel separator. All analyses were performed using Alinity systems (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, USA) and samples were stored at 2-8 °C. Measurements were conducted in primary plasma tubes at specific time points up to 48 hours, with an additional stability study in plasma aliquots extending the time storage up to 96 hours. The stability limit was estimated considering the total limit of change criteria. Results: Of the 29 studied parameters, 24 demonstrated stabilities within a 48-hour storage period in primary plasma tubes. However, five analytes: aspartate aminotransferase, glucose, lactate dehydrogenase, inorganic phosphate and potassium evidenced instability at different time points (7.9 hours, 2.7 hours, 2.9 hours, 6.2 hours and 4.7 hours, respectively). The stability study in plasma aliquots showed that all parameters remained stable for 96 hours, except lactate dehydrogenase, with a stability limit of 63 hours. Conclusions: A reduced stability of primary plasma samples was observed for five common biochemical analytes ordered in an emergency context. To ensure the quality of add-on testing for these samples, plasma aliquots provide stability for a longer period.

Early nutritional risk detection and intervention in COVID-19 hospitalized patients through the implementation of electronic automatized alarms.

INTRODUCTION: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients may present acute malnutrition which could influence morbidity and mortality. In the first wave of the pandemic severe weight loss was observed in many hospitalized patients. This pilot study evaluates the usefulness of an electronic automatized alarm for the early quantification of a low food intake as a predictor of the risk of malnutrition using COVID-19 disease as a model of severe illness. METHODS: Observational prospective nutritional screening with a daily automatized warning message to the Endocrinology and Nutrition Service provided by the Information Systems. All adult patients admitted for COVID-19 from November 2020 to February 2021 were included. When diet intake was <50% during consecutive 48h, an automated message was generated identifying the patient as "at nutritional risk (NR)" and additional specialist nutritional evaluation and therapy was performed within the next 24h. RESULTS: 205 patients out of 1176 (17.4%) were detected by automatized alarm and were considered as presenting high NR; 100% were concordant by the validated nutritional screening SNAQ. Nutritional support after detection was: 77.6% dietary adaptation+oral supplements; 9.3% enteral nutrition (EN); 1.5% parenteral nutrition (PN); 1% EN+PN and 10.7% no intervention is performed due to an end-of-life situation. Median weight loss during admission was 2.5kg (p25 0.25-p75: 6kg). Global mortality was 6.7% while in those detected by automatized alarm was 31.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an electronic NR screening tool was feasible and allowed the early nutritional assessment and intervention in COVID-19 hospitalized patients and can be useful in patients hospitalized for other pathologies.

Assessing dynamic change in muscle during treatment of patients with cancer: Precision testing standards.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography images acquired during routine cancer care provide an opportunity to determine body composition with accuracy and precision. Quantification of skeletal muscle is of interest owing to its association with clinical outcomes. However, the standards of precision testing considered mandatory in other areas of radiology are lacking from the literature in this area. We aim to describe the change in skeletal muscle over time at different anatomical levels using the precision error. METHODS: Thirty-eight male patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were evaluated at two time points encompassing their treatment plan. Precision testing consisted of analyzing the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the skeletal muscle and total adipose tissue of 76 CT studies (38 images at baseline repeated twice and 38 follow-up images repeated twice) measured by a skilled observer. The % coefficient of variation (%CV), the root-mean-square standard deviation (RMS SD) and the corresponding 95% least significant change (LSC) were calculated for four anatomical levels: upper arm, thigh, chest and abdomen. RESULTS: The median time between scans was 223.6 (SD 31.2) days. Precision error (% CV) for total skeletal muscle cross sectional area was 0.86% for upper arm, 0.26% for thigh, 0.39% for chest and 0.63% for abdomen. The corresponding LSC values in upper arm, thigh, chest and abdomen were 2.4%, 0.7%, 1.1% and 1.8%, respectively. Based on the LSC for RMS SD, patients were classified in two categories according to muscle cross-sectional area: stable (i.e within LSC value) or gained and loss. To compare the four anatomical levels, the proportion of patients with muscle loss exceeding the LSC value was 74.3% for arm, 86.2% for thigh, 82.9% for chest and 76.3% for abdomen. For these same anatomic regions, the mean muscle loss for those patients classified below the LSC was 14.6% (SD 9.3), 13.4% (SD 7.8), 11.9% (SD 6.5) and 11.6% (SD 5.5), respectively. Only the loss of muscle area was significantly higher in thigh (p = 0.023), using L3 as the reference level. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the uniform use of a standard precision test when reporting muscle change over time. LSC values vary from 0.7 to 2.4% depending on anatomic site; with the lowest precision error to detect change in the thigh. Based on this analysis, muscle wasting appears to be systemic and while present in limbs and trunk is significantly higher in the thigh than in the chest, abdomen or upper arm.

Impact of COVID-19 on nutritional status during the first wave of the pandemic.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients affected by COVID-19 may develop disease related malnutrition (DRM) due to the catabolic situation, symptoms that interfere with intake and prolonged hospital stay. This study aims to know the percentage of patients admitted for COVID-19 who required artificial nutrition (AN), their clinical characteristics, as well as the prevalence of DRM and the risk of sarcopenia at hospital discharge and after 6 months. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, prospective study, with successive inclusion of adult patients admitted for COVID-19 in whom institutional nutritional support (NS) care protocol was applied. Those who received AN underwent a nutritional screening by Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ) and an assessment by Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) at hospital discharge, as well as a screening for sarcopenia (SARC-F test) and SNAQ re-test 15 days and 6 months after by a phone call. Symptoms related to food intake, anthropometric and analytical data were also collected. RESULTS: We evaluated 936 patients with a mean age of 63.7 ± 15.3 years; predominantly male (59.7%), overweight 41%, obesity 40.4%; hypertension 52.9%; diabetes mellitus 26.6% and cancer 10.4%. The stay hospital length was 17.3 ± 13.8 days and 13.6% patients died during hospitalization. The modality of nutritional support was: 86.1% dietary adaptation + oral nutritional supplements (ONS); 12.4% enteral nutrition (EN) by nasogastric (NG) tube; 0.9% parenteral nutrition (PN) and 0.6% EN plus PN. Focusing on patients who received AN, follow-up post discharge was possible in 62 out of 87 who survived. Of these, at the time of hospital discharge, 96.7% presented nutritional risk by SNAQ and 100% malnutrition by SGA (20% B; 80% C). During admission, 82.3% presented intense anorexia and the mean weight loss was 10.9 ± 6 Kg (p < 0.001). Fifteen days after being discharged, 12.9% still had anorexia, while hyperphagia appeared in 85.5% of the patients and risk of sarcopenia by SARC-F was present in 87.1% of them. Six months after discharge, 6.8% still had anorexia and 3.4% hyperphagia, with a global weight gain of 4.03 ± 6.2 Kg (p=<0.0001). Risk of malnutrition was present in only 1.7% of the patients, although risk of sarcopenia persisted in 49.2%. CONCLUSION: All patients admitted by COVID-19 for whom EN or PN were indicated following an institutional protocol still presented malnutrition at hospital discharge, and almost all showed risk of sarcopenia, that persisted in almost half of them at 6 months. These findings suggest that nutritional and functional problems persist in these patients after discharge, indicating that they require prolonged nutritional support and monitoring.

Predictive Value of Skeletal Muscle Mass in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Reduced muscle mass has been associated with increased treatment complications in several tumor types. We evaluated the impact of skeletal muscle index (SMI) on prognosis and immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) in a cohort of recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI). METHODS: A single-institutional, retrospective study was performed including 61 consecutive patients of R/M HNSCC diagnosed between July 2015 and December 2018. SMI was quantified using a CT scan at L3 to evaluate body composition. Median baseline SMI was used to dichotomize patients in low and high SMI. Kaplan-Meier estimations were used to detect overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Toxicity was recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event v4.3. RESULTS: Patients were 52 men (85.2%) with mean of age 57.7 years (SD 9.62), mainly oral cavity (n = 21; 34.4%). Low SMI was an independent factor for OS in the univariate (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.14-3.73, p = 0.017) and multivariate Cox analyses (HR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.29-6.94; p = 0.011). PFS was also reduced in patients with low SMI (PFS HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.08-3.12; p = 0.025). IrAEs occurred in 29 (47.5%) patients. There was no association between low SMI and IrAEs at any grade (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.20-1.54; p = 0.261). However, grades 3 to 4 IrAEs were developed in seven patients of whom three had low SMI. CONCLUSIONS: Low SMI before ICI treatment in R/M HNSCC patients had a negative impact on OS and PFS. Further prospective research is needed to confirm the role of body composition as a predictive biomarker in ICI treatment.

¿Por qué los pacientes no toman la suplementación nutricional? / Why don't patients take their nutritional supplements?

La suplementación nutricional oral (SNO) forma parte del soporte nutricional en pacientes desnutridos. A pesar de que la adherencia y el cumplimiento tienen connotaciones diferentes, habitualmente se utiliza indistintamente tanto en publicaciones como en la práctica clínica diaria. La adherencia puede medirse a través de métodos objetivos y subjetivos. Sin embargo, las cifras son muy diversas debido a la gran variabilidad en el diseño de los estudios, los métodos de medición y la definición de adherencia, el ámbito de estudio y el tipo de pacientes. Existen varios factores que pueden influir negativamente en la adherencia a la suplementación nutricional y, por lo tanto, comprometer el estado nutricional de los pacientes. Estos factores están relacionados con el propio paciente, el entorno donde se consume el suplemento, el propio producto consumido y el papel del prescriptor. Los estudios publicados hasta el momento presentan importantes limitaciones en cuanto a sus objetivos, su calidad y el tiempo transcurrido para evaluar la adherencia. Un enfoque global podría ayudar a mejorar el consumo de suplementación nutricional en pacientes con un estado nutricional comprometido y que necesitasen una prescripción nutricional a medio-largo plazo. La realización de futuros estudios en grupos concretos de población que evalúen no solo los aspectos organolépticos de los SNO, sino que aborden la influencia de todos los factores que afectan directa o indirectamente la adherencia a la suplementación nutricional es fundamental, especialmente para aquellos que presentan desnutrición

Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are part of the nutritional support for malnourished patients. Although the terms "adherence" and "compliance" have different connotations, they tend to be interchangeable in literature and in the daily clinical practice. Adherence can be measured through objective and subjective methods. However, research results vary enormously due to the huge differences in design, measurement methodology, adherence definition, scope and type of patients. There are several factors that may have a detrimental effect on adherence to nutritional supplements and, therefore, compromise patients' nutritional condition. These factors are associated to the patient, the environment in which the supplement is taken, the supplement itself and the prescriber's role. Researches published to date show considerable limitations in terms of targets, quality and the period of time over which adherence is estimated. A global approach may help malnourished patients requiring a dietary prescription in the medium-long term improve their intake of nutritional supplements. It is essential to conduct further research with specific population groups, particularly with malnourished patients, evaluating not only the organoleptic properties of ONS but also the influence of all factors directly or indirectly affecting adherence to nutritional supplements