Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation of adrenal metastases secondary to lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Assess safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for adrenal metastases (AM) secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with NSCLC AM treated with thermal ablation between 2/2010-11/2021. Local tumor progression free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. RESULTS: Seven patients (mean age ± SD, 63.9 ± 12.5 years; 6 males) with seven AM were treated in eight sessions. Retreatment was performed in one patient with residual disease. Five sessions were with microwave ablation and 3 with radiofrequency ablation. Mean tumor size was 20.1 ± 7.0 mm. Median number of ablation probes used was 1 (range, 1-5), with a median of 3 activations (range, 1-3), and average ablation time of 14.4 ± 15.0 minutes. Response based on RECIST v 1.1 or PERCIST criteria revealed stable disease in 1 tumor, progression of disease in 3 tumors (one was re-ablated), and partial response in 3 tumors. Median LTPFS was not reached (NR) [95 % CI: 1- NR]. Median OS was 47.97 months (95 % CI: 18.63- NR). Intraprocedural hypertension (blood pressure ≥180 mmHg) occurred during 5/8 (62.5 %) sessions and intraoperative tachycardia occurred during 2/8 (25 %) sessions. Complications within one month of ablation occurred in 3/8 (37.5 %) sessions: grade 2 pneumothorax, grade 1 hematuria, and grade 2 adrenal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: In this small series, thermal ablation for NSCLC AM resulted in prolonged local control and OS with no major complications.

Adjusted Tumor Enhancement on Dual-Phase Cone-Beam CT: Predictor of Response and Overall Survival in Patients with Liver Malignancies Treated with Hepatic Artery Embolization.

The aim of this study was to examine the value of tumor enhancement parameters on dual-phase cone-beam CT (CBCT) in predicting initial response, local progression-free survival (L-PFS) and overall survival (OS) following hepatic artery embolization (HAE). Between Feb 2016 and Feb 2023, 13 patients with 29 hepatic tumors treated with HAE were analyzed. Pre- and post-embolization, subtracted CBCTs were performed, and tumor enhancement parameters were measured, resulting in three parameters: pre-embolization Adjusted Tumor Enhancement (pre-ATE), post-embolization ATE and the difference between pre- and post-ATE (∆ATE). Treatment response was evaluated using the mRECIST criteria at 1 month. Tumors were grouped into complete response (CR) and non-complete response (non-CR) groups. To account for the effect of multiple lesions per patient, a cluster data analytic method was employed. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized for survival analysis using the lesion with the lowest ∆ATE value in each patient. Seventeen (59%) tumors showed CR and twelve (41%) showed non-CR. Pre-ATE was 38.5 ± 10.6% in the CR group and 30.4 ± 11.0% in the non-CR group (p = 0.023). ∆ATE in the CR group was 39 ± 12 percentage points following embolization, compared with 29 ± 11 in the non-CR group (p = 0.009). Patients with ∆ATE > 33 had a median L-PFS of 13.1 months compared to 5.7 in patients with ∆ATE ≤ 33 (95% CI = 0.038-0.21) (HR, 95% CI = 0.45, 0.20-0.9, p = 0.04). Patients with ∆ATE ≤ 33 had a median OS of 19.7 months (95% CI = 3.77-19.8), while in the ∆ATE > 33 group, median OS was not reached (95% CI = 20.3-NA) (HR, 95% CI = 0.15, 0.018-1.38, p = 0.04). CBCT-derived ATE parameters can predict treatment response, L-PFS and OS following HAE.

Outcomes of Y90 Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Previously Treated with Transarterial Embolization.

The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients previously treated with transarterial embolization (TAE). In this retrospective study, all HCC patients who received TARE from 1/2012 to 12/2022 for treatment of residual or recurrent disease after TAE were identified. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate Cox regression was performed to determine significant predictors of OS after TARE. Twenty-one patients (median age 73.4 years, 18 male, 3 female) were included. Median dose to the perfused liver volume was 121 Gy (112-444, range), and 18/21 (85.7%) patients received 112-140 Gy. Median OS from time of HCC diagnosis was 32.9 months (19.4-61.4, 95% CI). Median OS after first TAE was 29.3 months (15.3-58.9, 95% CI). Median OS after first TARE was 10.6 months (6.8-27.0, 95% CI). ECOG performance status of 0 (p = 0.038), index tumor diameter < 4 cm (p = 0.022), and hepatic tumor burden < 25% (p = 0.018) were significant predictors of longer OS after TARE. TARE may provide a survival benefit for appropriately selected patients with HCC who have been previously treated with TAE.

Imaging Considerations before and after Liver-Directed Locoregional Treatments for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death. Liver metastases will develop in over one-third of patients with colorectal cancer and are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Even though surgical resection has been considered the mainstay of treatment, only approximately 20% of the patients are surgical candidates. Liver-directed locoregional therapies such as thermal ablation, Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization, and stereotactic body radiation therapy are pivotal in managing colorectal liver metastatic disease. Comprehensive pre- and post-intervention imaging, encompassing both anatomic and metabolic assessments, is invaluable for precise treatment planning, staging, treatment response assessment, and the prompt identification of local or distant tumor progression. This review outlines the value of imaging for colorectal liver metastatic disease and offers insights into imaging follow-up after locoregional liver-directed therapy.

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation for primary and metastatic pleural based tumors.

PURPOSE: Assess safety and local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) of percutaneous cryoablation for pleural-based thoracic malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 46 patients (17 treated for palliation; 9 for oligoprogression; 20 for curative intent), with 62 pleural-based thoracic lesions, treated in 59 cryoablation sessions. Patients were treated from 9/2005-11/2021 with CryoCare CS (Varian, Irvine, CA) or IceFORCE (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) systems. For tumors treated with curative intent and/or oligoprogression, LTPFS of the treated tumor(s) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Post-operative complications were reported for all sessions, including those with palliative intent; univariate analyses were used to calculate factors associated with increased complication risk. RESULTS: Median number of tumors treated in a single treatment session was 1 (range 1-4). Largest dimension of the treated tumor was 2.1 cm [IQR:0.9-5 cm]. Of the 59 treatments, 98.3 % were technically successful. Median LTPFS was 14.4 (95 % CI: 9.4-25.6) months. Tumor size was a significant predictor of LTPFS (HR: 1.21, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.44, p = 0.023). Median OS was 52.4 (28.1-NR) months. Complications occurred in 28/59 sessions (47.5 %); 2/59 (3.4 %) were ≥ grade D by Society of Interventional Radiology adverse event criteria (death; hypoxia requiring supplemental oxygen upon discharge). Pain and pneumothorax were the most common complications. The length of lung parenchyma traversed was a significant predictor of pneumothorax: HR 0.48 (95 %CI: 0.14-0.83), p = 0.0024. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous cryoablation for pleural lesions is associated with a long duration of local control and most complications were minor and self-limited.

Histopathologic Changes after Yttrium-90 Radioembolization of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Pilot Feasibility Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the histopathologic changes and potential correlations of tumor absorbed dose (TAD) after yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective pilot study assessed 12 patients with 13 CLMs through positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsies before, immediately after TARE (T0), and 3 weeks after TARE (T3). Subsequent sampling from the same location was enabled by fiducial placement. Biopsy samples were evaluated with hematoxylin and eosin, TUNEL, Ki67, OxPhos, caspase-3 (CC3), and pH2AX antibodies. Proliferation changes (Ki67) and double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) were evaluated quantitatively. TAD was calculated on post-TARE PET/CT scan of the biopsy needle location at T0 and T3. RESULTS: Median TAD at 3 weeks after TARE was 162 Gy (interquartile range (IQR), 92-211 Gy). DSBs decreased significantly from T0 (median, 77%; IQR, 75%-100%) to T3 (median, 14%; IQR, 0%-54%; P = .028). A decrease in Ki67 was also documented (median, 73%; IQR, 70%-80% at T0 vs median, 41%; IQR, 0%-66% at T3; P = .046). There was a strong positive correlation between TAD and DSBs at T0 (r[9] = 0.68) and a strong negative correlation at T3 (r[10] = -0.855; P = .042 and P = .002, respectively). There was a strong negative correlation between TAD and Ki67 at both T0 (r[9] = -0.733; P = .025) and T3 (r[10] = -0.681; P = .030). Tumors that exhibited caspase-3 activation (8/13, 62%) at either T0 or T3 time point were more likely to develop progression (7/8 [88%] vs 1/5 [20%]; P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: Post-TARE biopsy can be used to assess TAD and histopathologic changes. Significant decreases in DSBs and proliferation index were noted after TARE. Post-TARE CC3 activation deserves further exploration.

Comparison of periprocedural and procedure room times between moderate sedation and monitored anesthesia care in interventional radiology.

Objectives: In recent years, there has been increased utilization of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in interventional radiology (IR) departments. The purpose of this study was to compare pre-procedure bed, procedure room, and post-procedure bed times for IR procedures performed with either nurse-administered moderate sedation (MOSED) or MAC. Material and Methods: An institutional review board-approved single institution retrospective review of IR procedures between January 2010 and September 2022 was performed. Procedures performed with general anesthesia or local anesthetic only, missing time stamps, or where <50 cases were performed for both MAC and MOSED were excluded from the study. Pre-procedure bed, procedure room, post-procedure bed, and total IR encounter times were compared between MAC and MOSED using the t-test. The effect size was estimated using Cohen's d statistic. Results: 97,480 cases spanning 69 procedure codes were examined. Mean time in pre-procedure bed was 27 min longer for MAC procedures (69 vs. 42 min, P < 0.001, d = 0.95). Mean procedure room time was 11 min shorter for MAC (60 vs. 71 min, P < 0.001, d = 0.48), and mean time in post-procedure bed was 10 min longer for MAC (102 vs. 92 min, P < 0.001, d = 0.22). Total IR encounter times were on average 27 min longer for MAC cases (231 vs. 204 min, P < 0.001, d = 0.41). Conclusion: MAC improves the utilization of IR procedure rooms, but at the cost of increased patient time in the pre- and post-procedure areas.

Three-Dimensional Margin as a Predictor of Local Tumor Progression after Microwave Ablation: Intraprocedural versus 4-8-Week Postablation Assessment.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic accuracy of intraprocedural and 4-8-week (current standard) post-microwave ablation zone (AZ) and margin assessments for prediction of local tumor progression (LTP) using 3-dimensional (3D) software. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data regarding 100 colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) in 75 patients were collected from 2 prospective fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-guided microwave ablation (MWA) trials. The target CLMs and theoretical 5- and 10-mm margins were segmented and registered intraprocedurally and at 4-8 weeks after MWA contrast-enhanced CT (or magnetic resonance [MR] imaging) using the same methodology and 3D software. Tumor and 5- and 10-mm minimal margin (MM) volumes not covered by the AZ were defined as volumes of insufficient coverage (VICs). The intraprocedural and 4-8-week post-MWA VICs were compared as predictors of LTP using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 19.6 months (interquartile range, 7.97-36.5 months). VICs for 5- and 10-mm MMs were predictive of LTP at both time assessments. The highest accuracy for the prediction of LTP was documented with the intra-ablation 5-mm VIC (area under the curve [AUC], 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.89). LTP for a VIC of 6-10-mm margin category was 11.4% compared with 4.3% for >10-mm margin category (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A 3D 5-mm MM is a critical endpoint of thermal ablation, whereas optimal local tumor control is noted with a 10-mm MM. Higher AUCs for prediction of LTP were achieved for intraprocedural evaluation than for the 4-8-week postablation 3D evaluation of the AZ.

Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization of Primary Lung Cancer Metastases to the Liver.

PURPOSE: To assess whether yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is safe and effective in the treatment of primary lung cancer metastases to the liver (LCML). METHODS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 57 patients with LCML who were treated with 79 TARE treatments. Histology included non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 27), small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (n = 17), and lung carcinoid (LC) (n = 13). Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method; differences between groups were estimated using log rank test. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine factors influencing survival. Adverse events were graded using the Society of Interventional Radiology Adverse Events Classification. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) was as follows: NSCLC, 8.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3-16.4 months); SCLC, 4.1 months (95% CI, 1.9-6.6 months); and LC, 43.5 months (95% CI, 7.8-61.4 months). For NSCLC, presence of bilobar vs unilobar disease (hazard ratio [HR], 5.24; 95% CI, 1.64-16.79; P = .002); more tumors, 2-5 vs 1 (HR, 4.88; 95% CI, 1.17-20.37; P = .003) and >5 vs 1 (HR, 3.75; 95% CI, 0.95-6.92; P = .05); and lobar vs segmental treatment (HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 0-NA; P = .002) were negative predictors of OS. For SCLC, receipt of >2 lines of chemotherapy vs ≤2 lines (HR, 3.16; 95% CI, 0.95-10.47; P = .05) was a negative predictor of OS. For LC, tumor involvement of >50% was a negative predictor of OS (HR, 3.77 × 1015; 95% CI, 0-NA; P = .002). There were 11 of 79 severe or life-threatening adverse events within 30 days (abdominal pain, altered mental status, nausea/vomiting, acalculous/aseptic cholecystitis, hyponatremia, pancreatitis, renal failure, and death from pneumonia). CONCLUSIONS: TARE has an acceptable safety profile for the treatment of LCML, with survival benefits best seen in LC tumors.

The Importance of Optimal Thermal Ablation Margins in Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 21 Studies.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. Thermal ablation (TA) can be a comparable alternative to partial hepatectomy for selected cases when eradication of all visible tumor with an ablative margin of greater than 5 mm is achieved. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to encapsulate the current clinical evidence concerning the optimal TA margin for local cure in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from inception until 1 May 2023, in accordance with the PRISMA Guidelines. Measure of effect included the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Overall, 21 studies were included, comprising 2005 participants and 2873 ablated CLMs. TA with margins less than 5 mm were associated with a 3.6 times higher risk for LTP (n = 21 studies, RR: 3.60; 95% CI: 2.58-5.03; p-value < 0.001). When margins less than 5 mm were additionally confirmed by using 3D software, a 5.1 times higher risk for LTP (n = 4 studies, RR: 5.10; 95% CI: 1.45-17.90; p-value < 0.001) was recorded. Moreover, a thermal ablation margin of less than 10 mm but over 5 mm remained significantly associated with 3.64 times higher risk for LTP vs. minimal margin larger than 10 mm (n = 7 studies, RR: 3.64; 95% CI: 1.31-10.10; p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis solidifies that a minimal ablation margin over 5 mm is the minimum critical endpoint required, whereas a minimal margin of at least 10 mm yields optimal local tumor control after TA of CLMs.

Hepatic Hilar Block as an Adjunct to Transarterial Embolization of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Retrospective Review of Safety and Efficacy.

PURPOSE: This study investigates whether hepatic hilar nerve blocks (HHNB) provide safe, effective analgesia in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) treated with transarterial embolization (TAE). METHODS: The retrospective study included all NETs treated with TAE or TAE + HHNB from 1/2020 to 8/2022. Eighty-five patients (45 men), mean age 62 years, were treated in 165 sessions (TAE, n = 153; TAE + HHNB, n = 12). For HHNBs, ≤10 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% ± 2 mg methylprednisolone were injected under ultrasound guidance. The aims were to assess safety of HHNB and reduction in pain. Groups were compared with Pearson's chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Logistic regression assessed independent risk factors for pain. RESULTS: No immediate complications from HHNBs were reported. No difference in incidence of major complications between TAE and TAE + HHNB one month post-embolization was observed (7.19% vs. 8.33%, p = 0.895). No differences in mean length of hospital stay after treatment were observed (TAE 2.2 days [95%CI: 1.74-2.56] vs. TAE + HHNB 2.8 days [95%CI: 1.43-4.26]; p = 0.174). Post-procedure pain was reported in 88.2% of TAE and 75.0% of TAE + HHNB patients (p = 0.185). HHNB recipients were more likely to use analgesic patches (25.0% vs. 5.88%; p = 0.014). No other differences in analgesic use were observed. CONCLUSIONS: HHNBs can safely be performed in patients with NETs. No difference in hospital stays or analgesic drug use was observed. Managing pain after TAE is an important goal; further study is warranted.

Percutaneous image-guided ablation for hepatic metastases.

The presence of hepatic metastases indicates advanced disease and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially when the hepatic disease is not amenable to locoregional treatments. The primary tumour of origin, the distribution and extent of metastatic disease, the underlying liver reserve, the patient performance status and the presence of comorbidities are factors that determine whether a patient will benefit from hepatectomy or local curative-intent treatments. For patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, the most common primary cancer that spreads to the liver, several studies have demonstrated a survival benefit for patients who can be treated with hepatectomy and/or percutaneous ablation, compared to those treated with chemotherapy alone. Despite advances in surgical techniques increasing the percentage of patients eligible for surgery, most patients have unresectable disease or are poor surgical candidates. Percutaneous ablation can be used to provide local disease control and prolong survival for both surgical and non-surgical candidates. This is typically offered to patients with small hepatic metastases that can be ablated with optimal (≥10 mm) or at least adequate minimum ablation margins (≥5 mm), as high local tumour control rates can be achieved for these patients which are comparable to surgical resection. This review summarizes available evidence and outcomes following percutaneous ablation of the most frequently encountered types of hepatic metastases in the clinical practice of interventional oncology. Patient selection, technical considerations, follow-up protocols and oncologic outcomes are presented and discussed.

Gradient-based Volumetric PET Parameters on Immediate Pre-ablation FDG-PET Predict Local Tumor Progression in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastasis Treated by Microwave Ablation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the optimal method of segmentation of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) on immediate pre-ablation PET scans and assess the prognostic value of quantitative pre-ablation PET parameters with regards to local tumor control. A secondary objective was to correlate the target tumor size estimation by PET methods with the tumor measurements on anatomical imaging. METHODOLOGY: A prospectively accrued cohort of 55 CLMs (46 patients) treated with real-time 18F-FDG-PET/CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation was followed-up for a median of 10.8 months (interquartile: 5.5-20.2). Total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) values of each CLM were derived from pre-ablation 18F-FDG-PET with gradient and threshold PET segmentation methodologies. The event was defined as local tumor progression (LTP). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to assess area under the curves (AUCs). Intraclass correlation (ICC) and 95.0% confidence interval (CI) were performed to measure the linear relationships between the continuous variables. RESULTS: AUCs for prediction of LTP obtained from time-dependent ROC analysis for the gradient technique were higher in comparison to the threshold methodologies (AUCs for TLG and volume were: 0.790 and 0.807, respectively). ICC between PET gradient-based and anatomical measurements were higher in comparison to threshold methodologies (ICC for the longest diameter: 733 (95.0% CI 0.538-0.846), ICC for the shortest diameter: .747 (95.0% CI 0.546-0.859), p-values < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The gradient-based technique had a higher AUC for prediction of LTP after microwave ablation of CLM and showed the highest correlation with anatomical imaging tumor measurements.

Factors affecting outcomes of Yttrium-90 radioembolization in heavily pretreated patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is a liver-directed treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The aim of this study is to evaluate factors affecting outcomes of TARE in heavily pretreated ICC patients. METHODS: We evaluated pretreated ICC patients who received TARE from January 2013 to December 2021. Prior treatments included systemic therapy, hepatic resection, and liver-directed therapies, including hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, external beam radiation, transarterial embolization, and thermal ablation. Patients were classified based on history of hepatic resection and genomic status based on next-generation sequencing (NGS). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) after TARE. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with median age 66.1 years (range, 52.4-87.5), 11 females and 3 males, were included. Prior therapies included systemic in 13/14 patients (93%), liver resection in 6/14 (43%), and liver-directed therapy in 6/14 (43%). Median OS was 11.9 months (range, 2.8-81.0). Resected patients had significantly longer median OS compared to unresected patients (16.6 versus 7.9 months; p = 0.038). Prior liver-directed therapy (p = 0.043), largest tumor diameter > 4 cm (p = 0.014), and > 2 hepatic segments involvement (p = 0.001) were associated with worse OS. Nine patients underwent NGS; 3/9 (33.3%) and had a high-risk gene signature (HRGS), defined as alterations in TP53, KRAS, or CDKN2A. Patients with a HRGS had worse median OS (10.0 versus 17.8 months; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: TARE may be used as salvage therapy in heavily treated ICC patients. Presence of a HRGS may predict worse OS after TARE. Further investigation with more patients is recommended to validate these results.

Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Genomics and Biomarkers with Focus on Local Therapies.

Molecular cancer biomarkers help personalize treatment, predict oncologic outcomes, and identify patients who can benefit from specific targeted therapies. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third-most common cancer, with the liver being the most frequent visceral metastatic site. KRAS, NRAS, BRAF V600E Mutations, DNA Mismatch Repair Deficiency/Microsatellite Instability Status, HER2 Amplification, and NTRK Fusions are NCCN approved and actionable molecular biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Additional biomarkers are also described and can be helpful in different image-guided hepatic directed therapies specifically for CRLM. For example, tumors maintaining the Ki-67 proliferation marker after thermal ablation have been particularly resilient to ablation. Ablation margin was also shown to be an important factor in predicting local recurrence, with a ≥10 mm minimal ablation margin being required to attain local tumor control, especially for patients with mutant KRAS CRLM.

Reducing Wait Times for Radiology Exams Around Holiday Periods: A Monte Carlo Simulation.

Reducing patient wait times is a key operational goal and impacts patient outcomes. The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of different radiology scheduling strategies on exam wait times before and after holiday periods at an outpatient imaging facility using computer simulation. An idealized Monte Carlo simulation of exam scheduling at an outpatient imaging facility was developed based on the actual distribution of scheduled exams at outpatient radiology sites at a tertiary care medical center. Using this simulation, we examined three scheduling strategies: (1) no scheduling modifications, (2) increase imaging capacity before or after the holiday (i.e. increase facility hours), and (3) use a novel rolling release scheduling paradigm. In the third scenario, a fraction of exam slots are blocked to long-term follow-up exams and made available only closer to the exam date, thereby preventing long-term follow-up exams from filling the schedule and ensuring slots are available for non-follow-up exams. We examined the effect of these three scenarios on utilization and wait times, which we defined as the time from order placement to exam completion, during and after the holiday period. The baseline mean wait time for non-follow-up exams was 5.4 days in our simulation. When no scheduling modifications were made, there was a significant increase in wait times in the week preceding the holiday when compared to baseline (10.0 days vs 5.4 days, p < 0.01). Wait times remained elevated for 4 weeks following the holiday. Increasing imaging capacity during the holiday and post-holiday period by 20% reduced wait times by only 6.2% (9.38 days vs 10.0 days, p < 0.01). Increasing capacity by 50% resulted in a 7.1% reduction in wait times (9.28 days, p < 0.01), and increasing capacity by 100% resulted in a 13% reduction in wait times (8.75 days, p < 0.01). In comparison, using a rolling release model produced a reduction in peak wait times equivalent to doubling capacity (8.76 days, p < 0.01) when 45% of slots were reserved. Improvements in wait times persisted even when rolling release was limited to the 3 weeks preceding or 1 week following the holiday period. Releasing slots on a rolling basis did not significantly decrease utilization or increase wait times for long-term follow-up exams except in extreme scenarios where 80% or more of slots were reserved for non-follow-up exams. A rolling release scheduling paradigm can significantly reduce wait time fluctuations around holiday periods without requiring additional capacity or impacting utilization.

Real-Time Split-Dose PET/CT-Guided Ablation Improves Colorectal Liver Metastasis Detection and Ablation Zone Margin Assessments without the Need for Repeated Contrast Injection.

BACKGROUND: Real-time split-dose PET can identify the targeted colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) and eliminate the need for repeated contrast administration before and during thermal ablation (TA). This study aimed to assess the added value of pre-ablation real-time split-dose PET when combined with non-contract CT in the detection of CLM for ablation and the evaluation of the ablation zone and margins. METHODS: A total of 190 CLMs/125 participants from two IRB-approved prospective clinical trials using PET/CT-guided TA were analyzed. Based on detection on pre-TA imaging, CLMs were categorized as detectable, non-detectable, and of poor conspicuity on CT alone, and detectable, non-detectable, and low FDG-avidity on PET/CT after the initial dose. Ablation margins around the targeted CLM were evaluated using a 3D volumetric approach. RESULTS: We found that 129/190 (67.9%) CLMs were detectable on CT alone, and 61/190 CLMs (32.1%) were undetectable or of poor conspicuity, not allowing accurate depiction and targeting by CT alone. Thus, the theoretical 5- and 10-mm margins could not be defined in these tumors (32.1%) using CT alone. When TA intraprocedural PET/CT images are obtained and inspected (fused PET/CT), only 4 CLM (2.1%) remained undetectable or had a low FDG avidity. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of PET to non-contrast CT improved CLM detection for ablation targeting, margin assessments, and continuous depiction of the FDG avid CLMs during the ablation without the need for multiple intravenous contrast injections pre- and intra-procedurally.

Perfusion-only imaging in pregnant women: A comparative reader study with implications for practice patterns.

This study seeks to understand the value of ventilation imaging in pregnant patients imaged for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). Ventilation-perfusion (VQ) scans in this high-risk population were compared to ventilation-only scans. We hypothesize that in this relatively healthy population, the exclusion of ventilation scans will not impact the rate of scans interpreted as positive. This retrospective blinded comparative reader study on collated VQ scans performed on pregnant patients in the course of routine clinical care in a > 5 year period (03/2012 to 07/2017). Each set of VQ and perfusion only (Q) studies were reviewed by 8 readers (4 nuclear radiology fellows and 4 nuclear medicine faculty) in random order; the Q scans simply omitted the ventilation images. Readers recorded each study as PE, no PE, or non-diagnostic (prospective investigative study of acute PE diagnosis classifications). Logistic mixed effects models were used to test the association between scan type (VQ vs Q). 203 pairs of studies in 197 patients were included (6 patients had 2 scans). Subjects ranged from 14 to 45 years of age, with a median 28 years. A significant association between scan type and positive/negative classification. Q-scans received more positive classifications than VQ-scans (median of 7.6% vs 6.7%). No association was seen between scan type and positive/indeterminate classification, nor between scan type and negative/indeterminate classification. The exclusion of ventilation images in VQ-scans was associated with a higher rate of positive studies, but this difference was small (<1%). Given the overwhelmingly normal percentage of Q-exams (>90% in our study), and the benefits of omitting ventilation imaging, perfusion-only imaging should be considered a reasonable option for imaging the pregnant patient to exclude PE.

3D margin assessment predicts local tumor progression after ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and prognostic value of 3D measuring of the ablation margins using a dedicated image registration software. METHODS: This retrospective study included 104 colorectal liver metastases in 68 consecutive patients that underwent microwave ablation between 08/2012 and 08/2019. The minimal ablation margin (MM) was measured in 2D using anatomic landmarks on contrast enhanced CT(CECT) 4-8 weeks post-ablation, and in 3D using an image registration software and immediate post-ablation CECT. Local tumor progression (LTP) was assessed by imaging up to 24 months after ablation. A blinded interventional radiologist provided feedback on the possibility of additional ablation after examining the 3D-margin measurements. RESULTS: The 3D-margin assessment was completed in 79/104 (76%) tumors without the need for target manipulation. In 25/104 (24%) tumors, manipulation was required due to image misregistration. LTP was observed in 40/104 (38.5%) tumors: 92.5% vs 7.5% for those with margin <5mm vs ≥5mm, respectively (p = 0.0001). The 2D and 3D-assessments identified margin <5mm in 17/104 (16%), and in 74/104 (71%) ablated tumors, respectively (p < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of the 3D software for predicting LTP was 93% (37/40) and 42% (27/64), respectively. Additional ablation to achieve a MM of 5 mm would have been offered in 26/37 cases if the 3D-margin assessment was available intraoperatively. CONCLUSION: Image registration software can measure ablation margins and detect MM under 5 mm intraoperatively, with significantly higher sensitivity than the 2D technique using landmarks on the post-ablation CECT. The identification of a margin under 5 mm is strongly associated with LTP.