Implementation of the WHO integrated care for older people (ICOPE) programme in clinical practice: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The INSPIRE integrated care for older people (ICOPE)-CARE programme is a public health programme implementing the ICOPE health-care pathway in clinical practice. The primary objective of this study was to describe the large-scale implementation and feasibility of the INSPIRE ICOPE-CARE guidelines in clinical practice. The secondary aims were to describe the characteristics of patients who were identified as positive for abnormalities in intrinsic capacity (ie, locomotion, cognition, psychology, vitality, hearing, and vision) during step 1, and to describe the prevalence of these positive screenings. METHODS: In this prospective study, we evaluated a real-life population of users of primary care services in the Occitania region (France). Participants who were aged 60 years and older and lived in a community were eligible for inclusion in our study. Individuals aged ≥60 years were screened (step 1) by health-care providers or through self-assessments using digital tools (the ICOPE MONITOR app and the ICOPEBOT conversational robot). Our implementation strategy involved raising awareness among health-care professionals about the WHO ICOPE programme, training professionals in the ICOPE-CARE guidelines, and developing a digital infrastructure (ie, digital tools, a database, and a remote ICOPE monitoring platform). The feasibility of implementing the INSPIRE ICOPE-CARE guidelines was determined by the anticipated inclusion of ≥10 000 participants, and having a follow-up rate of over 50%. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2020, and November 18, 2021, 10 903 older people (mean age 76·0, SD 10·5 years; 6627 [60·8%] of whom were women) had a baseline step 1 screening done, and 5185 (70·4%) of 7367 eligible participants had a 6-month follow-up of step 1 screening. 10 285 (94·3%) participants had a positive intrinsic capacity result during screening at baseline. 958 (9·3%) participants were evaluated with step 2 (in-depth assessments). Positive intrinsic capacity was confirmed in 865 (90·3%) participants. Most recommendations in step 3 (care plan) were related to locomotion, vitality, and cognition. INTERPRETATION: The high number of participants included in our study, as well as the high rates of follow-up, provides evidence to suggest that the large-scale implementation of ICOPE in clinical practice is feasible. The very high prevalence of positive screening for impaired intrinsic capacity during step 1, as well as the high rates of confirmed deficits in intrinsic capacity during step 2, suggest that the INSPIRE ICOPE-CARE programme is able to target individuals who are at increased risk for functional loss and disability. FUNDING: Occitania Regional Health Agency, Region Occitanie and Pyrénées-Méditerranée, European Regional Development Fund, and The Interreg Program V-A Spain-France-Andorra.

Erratum to: HARMONY Study: Pimavanserin Significantly Prolongs Time to Relapse of Dementia-Related Psychosis.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igaa057.530.].

Depression in People With Dementia and Caregiver Outcomes: Results From the European Right Time Place Care Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cross-sectional associations between depression in people with dementia and both caregiver burden and quality of life in 8 European countries, and to test these associations compared with the presence of other neuropsychiatric symptoms. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 1223 dyads comprised of informal caregivers and people with dementia living in a community-dwelling setting, recruited from the Right Time Place Care study, a cohort survey from 8 European countries. MEASURES: To test the associations between depression (according to the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia) and informal caregiver burden (defined by the Zarit scale and hours of supervision in terms of Resource Utilization in Dementia), distress (defined by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire distress score), and quality of life (according to the visual analogue scale and 12-item General Health Questionnaire). RESULTS: Linear regressions showed an association between depression and main outcomes (Zarit scale: ß 3.7; P = .001; hours of supervision: ß 1.7; P = .004; Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire distress score: ß 1.2; P = .002). A similar association was found concerning psychological and overall well-being (12-item General Health Questionnaire: ß 1.8; P < .001; Euroqol Visual Analogue Scale: ß -4.1; P = .003). Both associations remained significant despite the presence of other NPS and after adjusting for confounders. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Further studies are needed to assess whether providing tailored strategies for optimizing diagnosis and managing of depression in people with dementia might improve caregiver quality of life and reduce their burden in the community-dwelling setting.