Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Med Sci ; 303(1): 9-15, 1992 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1728876

ABSTRACT

This study was designed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of oral clonidine and oral labetalol in the treatment of severe hypertension in an emergency department setting. Thirty-six patients with severely elevated blood pressure (mean baseline blood pressure 199/132 mm Hg) without acute end-organ dysfunction were treated with either oral labetalol or oral clonidine in a randomized double-blind prospective study. Labetalol was administered as an initial dose of 200 mg, followed by hourly 200 mg doses up to 1,200 mg. Clonidine was administered as an initial dose of 0.2 mg, followed by hourly 0.1 mg doses up to 0.7 mg. Labetalol reduced diastolic blood pressure in 94% of the patients within 6 hours, with a mean reduction in blood pressure of 54/37 mm Hg. Clonidine reduced diastolic blood pressure in 83% of the patients within 6 hours, with a mean reduction in blood pressure of 57/32 mm Hg. The authors conclude that oral labetalol was comparable to clonidine in efficacy, had a similar incidence of side effects, and offered the clinician a useful alternative for the treatment of severe hypertension in an emergency department setting. Further studies are indicated to determine appropriate dosing regimens for oral labetalol in the acute treatment of severe hypertension.


Subject(s)
Clonidine/therapeutic use , Emergencies , Hypertension/drug therapy , Labetalol/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Clonidine/administration & dosage , Diastole/drug effects , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , Labetalol/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Systole/drug effects , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...