Attempts to eradicate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from a long-term-care facility with the use of mupirocin ointment.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of the use of mupirocin ointment on colonization, transmission, and infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a long-term-care facility. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 321 residents of a Veterans Affairs long-term-care facility from June 1990 through June 1991 were studied for MRSA colonization and infection. MRSA-colonized patients received mupirocin ointment to nares in the first 7 months and to nares and wounds in the second 5 months. The effect of mupirocin use on MRSA colonization and infection was monitored. All S. aureus strains isolated were tested for the development of resistance to mupirocin. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients colonized with MRSA received mupirocin ointment. Mupirocin rapidly eliminated MRSA at the sites treated in most patients by the end of 1 week. Weekly maintenance mupirocin was not adequate to prevent recurrences--40% of patients had recurrence of MRSA. Overall, MRSA colonization in the facility, which was 22.7% +/- 1% prior to the use of mupirocin, did not change when mupirocin was used in nares only (22.2% +/- 2.1%), but did decrease to 11.5% +/- 1.8% when mupirocin was used in nares and wounds. Although colonization decreased, roommate-to-roommate transmission and MRSA infection rates, low to begin with, did not change when mupirocin was used. Mupirocin-resistant MRSA strains were isolated in 10.8% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Mupirocin ointment is effective at decreasing colonization with MRSA. However, constant surveillance was required to identify patients colonized at admission or experiencing recurrence of MRSA during maintenance treatment. Long-term use of mupirocin selected for mupirocin-resistant MRSA strains. Mupirocin should be saved for use in outbreak situations, and not used over the long term in facilities with endemic MRSA colonization.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: colonization and infection in a long-term care facility.

OBJECTIVE: To assess methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization, transmission, and infection over a 1-year period in a long-term care facility with endemic MRSA. DESIGN: Monthly surveillance for MRSA colonization of nares, perineum, rectum, and wounds. SETTING: Long-term care facility attached to an acute care Veterans Affairs medical center. PATIENTS: All 341 patients in the facility had monthly surveillance cultures for 1 year. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Colonization and infection with MRSA. MAIN RESULTS: The monthly MRSA colonization rate was 23% +/- 1.0%; colonization occurred most commonly in the nares and wounds. Poor functional status was associated with MRSA colonization. Most patients (65%) never acquired MRSA; 25% of patients were already colonized at admission to the facility or at the start of the study, and only 10% of newly admitted patients acquired MRSA while in the facility. These latter patients acquired several different strains in a pattern of acquisition similar to that generally seen within the facility. In the course of 1 year, only nine patients who acquired MRSA had a roommate with the same phage type; no clustering was evident, and none of these patients developed infection. Nine other patients (3%) developed MRSA infection; five of these patients required hospitalization, but none died as a result of infection. CONCLUSIONS: In the long-term care facility in which our study took place, MRSA was endemic, and the infection rate was low. In such settings, the cost effectiveness of aggressive management of MRSA (widespread screening for MRSA and eradication with antimicrobial agents) needs to be assessed.

Increasing resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to ciprofloxacin.

We demonstrated the marked emergence of resistance to ciprofloxacin among Staphylococcus arueus strains isolated at the Ann Arbor Veterans Administration Medical Center. All S. aureus isolates tested from 1984 to 1985 were susceptible, whereas 55.1% of methicillin-resistant and 2.5% of methicillin-susceptible strains from 1989 had high-level resistance to ciprofloxacin.

Movement of personnel and wound contamination.

We studied the association between the movement of operating room personnel and bacterial contamination of the operative field during 12 clean operations. Settle plates placed on the patient's chest and instrument table were exposed during the operation. As a control, settle plates were exposed in the same locations when no personnel and patients were in the room. Bacterial contamination of the aseptic field was categorized as disseminating (Group A: greater than 42 combined movements) and nondisseminating (Group B: less than 42 combined movements). There were 24 persons in each group. There was a highly significant difference between the two groups in the colony counts on settling plates. More vigorous movement was associated with increased bacterial contamination of the operative field. Low bacterial colony counts were found in the control plates, ruling out environmental sources of contamination. Bacterial fallout correlated with the movement of personnel. Measures to reduce excessive movement in the OR are recommended.