Characterization of positioning uncertainties in PET-CT-MR trimodality solutions for radiotherapy.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the positioning uncertainties of two PET/CT-MR imaging setups, C1 and C2. Because the PET/CT data were acquired on the same hybrid device with automatic image registration, experiments were conducted using CT-MRI data. In C1, a transfer table was used, which allowed the patient to move from one imager to another while maintaining the same position. In C2, the patient stood up and was positioned in the same radiotherapy treatment position on each imager. The two setups provided a set of PET/CT and MR images. The accuracy of the registration software was evaluated on the CT-MRI data of one patient using known translations and rotations of MRI data. The uncertainties on the two setups were estimated using a phantom and a cohort of 30 patients. The accuracy of the positioning uncertainties was evaluated using descriptive statistics and a t-test to determine whether the mean shift significantly deviated from zero (p < 0.05) for each setup. The maximum registration errors were less than 0.97 mm and 0.6° for CT-MRI registration. On the phantom, the mean total uncertainties were less than 2.74 mm and 1.68° for C1 and 1.53 mm and 0.33° for C2. For C1, the t-test showed that the displacements along the z-axis did not significantly deviate from zero (p = 0.093). For C2, significant deviations from zero were present for anterior-posterior and superior-inferior displacements. The mean total uncertainties were less than 4 mm and 0.42° for C1 and less than 1.39 mm and 0.27° for C2 in the patients. Furthermore, the t-test showed significant deviations from zero for C1 on the anterior-posterior and roll sides. For C2, there was a significant deviation from zero for the left-right displacements.This study shows that transfer tables require careful evaluation before use in radiotherapy.

Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.

The study purpose was to determine the impact of anti-scatter grid removal on patient dose, in full field digital mammography. Dose saving, phantom based, was evaluated with the constraint that images acquired with and without grid would provide the same contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The digital equipment employed a flat panel detector with cesium iodide for x-ray to light conversion, 100 microm pixel size; the x-ray source was a dual-track tube with selectable filtration. Poly(methyl-emathocrylate) (PMMA) layers in the range 20-70 mm were used to simulate the absorption of different breast thickness, while two Al foils, 0.1 and 0.2 mm thick were used to provide a certain CNR. Images with grid were acquired with the same beam quality as selected in full automatic exposure mode and the mAs levels as close as possible, and the CNR measured for each thickness between 20 and 70 mm. Phantom images without grid were acquired in manual exposure mode, by selecting the same anode/filter combination and kVp as the image with grid at the same thickness, but varying mAs from 10 to 200. For each thickness, an image without aluminum was acquired for each mAs value, in order to obtain a flat image to be used to subtract the scatter nonuniformity from the phantom images. After scatter subtraction, the CNR was measured on images without grid. The mAs value that should be set to acquire a phantom image without grid so that it has the same CNR as the corresponding grid image was calculated. Therefore, mAs reduction percentage was determined versus phantom thickness. Results showed that dose saving was lower than 30% for PMMA equivalent breast thinner than 40 mm, decreased below 10% for intermediate thickness (45-50 mm), but there was no dose gain for thickness beyond 60 mm. By applying the mAs reduction factors to a clinical population derived from a data base of 4622 breasts, dose benefit was quantified in terms of population dose. On the average, the overall dose reduction was about 8%. It was considered small, not sufficient to justify a clinical implementation, and the anti-scatter grid was maintained.

Are phantoms useful for predicting the potential of dose reduction in full-field digital mammography?

A phantom study was performed in full-field digital mammography to investigate the opportunity and the magnitude of a possible dose reduction that would leave the image quality above the accepted thresholds associated with some classical phantoms. This preliminary work is intended to lay the groundwork for a future clinical study on the impact of dose reduction on clinical results. Three different mammography phantoms (ACR RMI 156, CIRS 11A and CDMAM 3.4) were imaged by a full-field digital mammography unit (GE Senographe 2000D) at different dose levels. Images were rated by three observers with softcopy reading and scoring methods specific to each phantom. Different types of data analysis were applied to the ACR (American College of Radiology) and the other two phantoms, respectively. With reference to the minimum acceptance score in screen/film accreditation programmes, the ACR phantom showed that about 45% dose reduction could be applied, while keeping the phantom scores above that threshold. A relative comparison was done for CIRS and CDMAM, for which no threshold is defined. CIRS scoring remained close to the reference level down to 40% dose reduction, the inter- and intra-observer variability being the main source of uncertainty. Contrast-detail curves provided by CDMAM overlapped down to 50% dose reduction, at least for object contrast values ranging between 30% and 3%. This multi-phantom study shows the potential of further reducing the dose in full-field digital mammography beyond the current values. A common dose reduction factor around 50% seems acceptable for all phantoms. However, caution is required before extrapolating the results for clinical use, given the limitations of these widely used phantoms, mainly related to their limited dynamic range and uniform background.