Responsiveness vs. basal activity of plasma ANG II as a determinant of arterial pressure salt sensitivity.

Infusion of angiotensin II (ANG II) causes salt-sensitive hypertension. It is unclear whether this is due to the body's inability to suppress ANG II during increased salt intake or, rather, an elevated basal level of plasma ANG II itself. To distinguish between these mechanisms, Sprague-Dawley rats were instrumented with arterial and venous catheters for measurement of arterial pressure and infusion of drugs, respectively. The sensitivity of arterial pressure to salt was measured in four groups with the following treatments: 1) saline control (Con, n = 12); 2) administration of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril to block endogenous ANG II (ANG-Lo, n = 10); 3) administration of enalapril and 5 ng.kg(-1).min(-1) ANG II to clamp plasma ANG II at normal levels (ANG-Norm, n = 10); and 4) administration of enalapril and 20 ng.kg(-1).min(-1) ANG II to clamp ANG II at high levels (ANG-Hi, n = 10). Rats ingested a 0.4% NaCl diet for 3 days and then a 4.0% NaCl diet for 11 days. Arterial pressure of rats fed the 0.4% NaCl diet was lower in ANG-Lo (84 +/- 2 mmHg) compared with Con (101 +/- 3 mmHg) and ANG-Norm (98 +/- 4 mmHg) groups, whereas ANG-Hi rats were hypertensive (145 +/- 4 mmHg). Salt sensitivity was expressed as the change in arterial pressure divided by the change in sodium intake on the last day of the 4.0% NaCl diet. Salt sensitivity (in mmHg/meq Na) was lowest in Con rats (0.0 +/- 0.1) and progressed from ANG-Lo (0.8 +/- 0.2) to ANG-Norm (1.5 +/- 0.5) to ANG-Hi (3.5 +/- 0.5) rats. We conclude that the major determinant of salt sensitivity of arterial pressure is the basal level of plasma ANG II rather than the responsiveness of the renin-angiotensin system.

Chronic hypotensive effects of losartan are not dependent on the actions of angiotensin II at AT 2 receptors.

We have previously demonstrated the chronic hypotensive effects of the AT1 antagonist, losartan, in normotensive, salt-replete rats. One explanation for this response is a reduction in vascular resistance due to blockade of AT1 receptors. Another explanation is that increases in angiotensin II levels during losartan administration can bind to AT2 receptors. Studies suggest that binding of angiotensin II at AT2 receptors lowers arterial pressure by vasodilation. We hypothesized that the chronic effects of losartan are mediated by activation of angiotensin II effects at AT2 receptors. We tested this hypothesis by infusing the AT2 receptor antagonist, PD123319 (74 mg/kg/day), in conjunction with losartan (10 mg/kg/day) for 10 days in rats and compared the hypotensive response in rats treated with losartan alone. After 6 days of treatment, arterial pressure decreased similarly in losartan (-21 +/- 2 mm Hg) and losartan+PD123319 (-23 +/- 2 mm Hg) treated rats. However, by day 10 of the infusion, arterial pressure had decreased to a greater extent (p < 0.05) in rats treated with losartan and PD123319 (-31 +/- 2 mm Hg) compared with rats treated with losartan alone (-22 +/- 2 mm Hg). We conclude that the hypotensive effects of losartan are not dependent on the actions of angiotensin II at AT 2 receptors in normotensive, salt-replete rats.