[Evaluation of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) and trastuzumab combination therapy as salvage treatment in patients with HER2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer].

BACKGROUND: Though irinotecan hydrochloride(CPT-11)was approved in Japan in 1994, there have been few reports since that evaluated the efficacy of CPT-11. The position of this agent in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer(MBC)is not definite. In addition, no report has been published to date about CPT-11 and trastuzumab combination therapy. PURPOSE: To evaluate retrospectively the efficacy of CPT-11 and trastuzumab combination therapy as salvage treatment in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)overexpressing MBC. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We examined ten cases who received this therapy against MBC since February 2002 till March 2007 in our hospital. Overall response rate, change of tumor markers, time to treatment failure (TTF), time to progression( TTP), overall survival (OS)after start of CPT-11 and adverse events were examined for efficacy and tolerability. RESULTS: Median age was 57 (40-67)and median number of prior chemotherapies was 5(2-9). Though the overall response rate was 20%, some tumor reduction was observed totally in seven cases. CEA and CA15-3 were decreased in 78%(7/9)and 63%(5/8) of cases, respectively. Median TTF, TTP and OS were 3, 4, and 6 months, respectively. Adverse events included three cases of severe neutropenia, one of whom died of treatment-related sepsis. Slight diarrhea occurred in seven and severe nausea occurred in two cases. Dose modification of CPT-11 was necessary in 5 cases, and three discontinued CPT-11 administration, mainly due to easy fatigability, nausea and neutropenia. During the therapy, four cases were all inpatients, and 6 eventually became outpatients. DISCUSSION: This therapy for patients with HER2 overexpressing metastatic cancer resistant to multi-agents demonstrated a good result in terms of antitumor effect. But high tolerability could not be documented by our experience with this therapy. It was supposed that the risk management with prediction of adverse events and preparation of better supportive therapy could make for the higher tolerability of this therapy for more effective clinical use.

[A case of paclitaxel and trastuzumab-resistant recurrent breast cancer with liver metastasis responding to S-1].

We experienced a case of paclitaxel- and trastuzumab-resistant recurrent breast cancer with liver metastases showing significant improvement by S-1. A 76-year-old woman was diagnosed with left breast cancer (T2N1M0, Stage II B). She received total mastectomy and CEF (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)) as adjuvant chemotherapy in March 2004. But twelve months later, she was referred to our clinic for management of lung and left supraclavicular lymph node metastases. Then weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) and trastuzumab were started. After 2 cycles of weekly paclitaxel and trastuzumab treatment, lung and lymph node metastases were reduced and the patient showed a clinical response (CR), so she was treated by trastuzumab only. But seven months later, she was diagnosed as a recurrence of liver metastases. She was treated by combined paclitaxel and trastuzumab again, but liver metastases and tumor marker were progressive. S-1 was administered orally 100 mg/day every day for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest interval as 1 cycle, and trastuzumab was injected at 2 mg/kg/week for every weeks. After 2 courses of the treatment, the level of tumor marker and tumor size of liver metastases were reduced. Only rash (grade 1) was observed during treatment. The treatment of S-1 is thought to be effective for taxane-resistant recurrent breast cancer.