Outcomes of a dexamethasone-prednisone combination treatment course for status asthmaticus.

OBJECTIVES: Dexamethasone has become the standard of care for pediatric patients with status asthmaticus in the emergency department (ED) setting. Inpatient providers often must decide between continuing the second dose of dexamethasone or transitioning to prednisone. The effectiveness of receiving dexamethasone followed by prednisone (combination therapy) compared to only prednisone or dexamethasone remains unclear. This study compares patient characteristics and ED reutilization/hospital readmission outcomes of dexamethasone, prednisone, and combination therapy for inpatient asthma management. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at our tertiary children's hospital of children aged 2 to 18 years hospitalized between March 2016 and December 2018 with a primary discharge diagnosis of asthma, reactive airway disease, or bronchospasm. The differences between steroid groups were compared using Fisher's exact or Chi-square tests for categorical variables, and a Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to analyze ED reutilization and hospital readmission rates. RESULTS: 1697 subjects met inclusion criteria. 115 (6.8%) patients received dexamethasone, 597 (35.2%) received prednisone, and 985 (58.0%) received combination therapy. Patients prescribed combination therapy had a lower exacerbation severity than patients prescribed prednisone, but higher severity than patients prescribed dexamethasone (p < .001, p = .001, respectively). Dexamethasone and combination therapy were not associated with increased 30-day ED reutilization/hospital readmissions compared to prednisone (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, most patients hospitalized for status asthmaticus received combination therapy. Despite the differences in severity between steroid groups, outcomes of combination therapy and dexamethasone monotherapy, as measured by frequency of ED reutilizations/hospital readmissions, are comparable to prednisone monotherapy.

Use of Clinical Practice Guideline to Improve Management of Osteoarticular Infections in Children.

OBJECTIVES: Osteoarticular infections (OAIs) in children pose significant risks if incorrectly managed. We introduced a clinical practice guideline (CPG) to decrease use of broad-spectrum and intravenous (IV) antibiotics for OAI treatment. The primary aims of our project were to decrease the percent of patients with empirical broad cephalosporin use to 10% and decrease IV antibiotic therapy on discharge to 20% while increasing narrow-spectrum oral antibiotic use to 80% within 24 months. METHODS: We used quality improvement methodology to study patients diagnosed with OAIs. Interventions included multidisciplinary workgroup planning, CPG implementation, education, information technology, and stakeholder feedback. Outcome measures were the percentage of patients prescribed empirical broad-spectrum cephalosporins, percent discharged on IV antibiotics, and percent discharged on narrow-spectrum oral antibiotics. Process measures included percent of patients hospitalized on medicine service and infectious diseases consultation. Balancing measures included rates of adverse drug reactions, disease complications, length of stay, and readmission within 90 days. The impact of the interventions was assessed with run and control charts. RESULTS: A total of 330 patients were included over 96 months. The percentage of patients with empirical broad cephalosporin coverage decreased from 47% to 10%, percent discharged on IV antibiotics decreased from 75% to 11%, and percent discharged on narrow-spectrum oral antibiotics increased from 24% to 84%. Adverse drug reactions decreased from 31% to 10%. Rates of complications, readmissions, and length of stay were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Through development and implementation of a CPG for OAI management, we demonstrated decreased use of empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics and improved definitive antibiotic management.

Current Practice and Rationale of Prescribing Dexamethasone for Pediatric Patients Hospitalized for Asthma.

OBJECTIVE: Dexamethasone use for pediatric asthma exacerbations in the emergency department is supported in literature as a beneficial alternative to prednisone; however, there is limited data in the hospital setting. This study assesses factors that influence pediatric hospital providers' steroid choice for patients hospitalized for status asthmaticus. METHODS: A survey was developed to assess factors influencing steroid prescribing practices. It was completed by our institution's pediatric hospitalists and advance practice providers in June 2019 and April 2021. Responses were summarized using descriptive statistics, interrater agreement was analyzed with Cohen's kappa statistic, and bivariate comparisons were analyzed with chi-square tests. RESULTS: Thirty-six of 39 providers completed the survey in 2019; 31 of 43 completed it in 2021. They reported wide disagreement with the use of dexamethasone in both surveys (2019 vs 2021: 34% vs 55% in favor, 43% vs 35% neutral, 23% vs 9% opposing, P = 0.191). There was a self-reported increase in prescribing frequency of dexamethasone from 2019 to 2021 (P = 0.007). There was moderate agreement with prescribing dexamethasone for patients with poor oral tolerance or medication noncompliance (2019: κ = 0.485, P = 0.002; 2021: κ = 0.281, P = 0.048). There was moderate agreement with prescribing prednisone for patients with higher severity of baseline asthma or current exacerbation (2019: κ = 0.537, P < 0.001; 2021: κ = 0.500, P < 0.001). Length of the dexamethasone course did not influence prescribing practices (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In our inpatient setting, prednisone is preferred for severe asthma cases, while dexamethasone is preferred for patients with poor oral tolerance or medication noncompliance. The length of the dexamethasone course did not influence providers' steroid choice.

All that Wheezes is not Asthma or Bronchiolitis.

Wheezing is a common finding across patients of all age groups presenting to the emergency department and being hospitalized for respiratory distress, with most patients responding to standard therapeutics and having readily apparent diagnoses of asthma or bronchiolitis. We describe several clinical entities that may present with wheezing and respiratory distress, calling attention to the broad differential that may masquerade as asthma or bronchiolitis, and potentially lead to misdiagnosis, delayed diagnosis, or inappropriate treatment.

Choosing Wisely in Pediatric Hospital Medicine: 5 New Recommendations to Improve Value.

OBJECTIVES: The health care system faces ongoing challenges due to low-value care. Building on the first pediatric hospital medicine contribution to the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation Choosing Wisely Campaign, a working group was convened to identify additional priorities for improving health care value for hospitalized children. METHODS: A study team composed of nominees from national pediatric medical professional societies was convened, including pediatric hospitalists with expertise in clinical care, hospital leadership, and research. The study team surveyed national pediatric hospitalist LISTSERVs for suggestions, condensed similar responses, and performed a literature search of articles published in the previous 10 years. Using a modified Delphi process, the team completed a series of structured ratings of feasibility and validity and facilitated group discussion. The sum of final mean validity and feasibility scores was used to identify the 5 highest priority recommendations. RESULTS: Two hundred seven respondents suggested 397 preliminary recommendations, yielding 74 unique recommendations that underwent evidence review and rating. The 5 highest-scoring recommendations had a focus on the following aspects of hospital care: (1) length of intravenous antibiotic therapy before transition to oral antibiotics, (2) length of stay for febrile infants evaluated for serious bacterial infection, (3) phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, (4) antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia, and (5) initiation of intravenous antibiotics in infants with maternal risk factors for sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that pediatric hospitalists can use this list to prioritize quality improvement and scholarly work focused on improving the value and quality of patient care for hospitalized children.

Factorial Analysis Quantifies the Effects of Pediatric Discharge Bundle on Hospital Readmission.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Factorial design of a natural experiment was used to quantify the benefit of individual and combined bundle elements from a 4-element discharge transition bundle (checklist, teach-back, handoff to outpatient providers, and postdischarge phone call) on 30-day readmission rates (RRs). METHODS: A 24 factorial design matrix of 4 bundle element combinations was developed by using patient data (N = 7725) collected from January 2014 to December 2017 from 4 hospitals. Patients were classified into 3 clinical risk groups (CRGs): no chronic disease (CRG1), single chronic condition (CRG2), and complex chronic condition (CRG3). Estimated main effects of each bundle element and their interactions were evaluated by using Study-It software. Because of variation in subgroup size, important effects from the factorial analysis were determined by using weighted effect estimates. RESULTS: RR in CRG1 was 3.5% (n = 4003), 4.1% in CRG2 (n = 1936), and 17.6% in CRG3 (n = 1786). Across the 3 CRGs, the number of subjects in the factorial groupings ranged from 16 to 674. The single most effective element in reducing RR was the checklist in CRG1 and CRG2 (reducing RR by 1.3% and 3.0%) and teach-back in CRG3 (by 4.7%) The combination of teach-back plus a checklist had the greatest effect on reducing RR in CRG3 by 5.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of bundle elements varied across risk groups, indicating that transition needs may vary on the basis of population. The combined use of teach-back plus a checklist had the greatest impact on reducing RR for medically complex patients.

Using Electronic Health Record Tools to Decrease Antibiotic Exposure in Infant Sepsis Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Our internal infant sepsis evaluation clinical practice guideline recommends infants with negative culture results who are undergoing sepsis evaluation receive antibiotics until culture results are negative for a maximum of 36 hours. The aims of our project were to decrease the percentage of patients who received >30 hours of administered antibiotic doses (recognizing effective concentrations last until hour 36) and increase 36-hour phrase documentation by using clinical decision support tools. METHODS: We used quality improvement methodology to study infants aged ≤60 days with negative culture results. The outcome measures were the percentage of patients who received >30 hours of administered antibiotic doses, the percentage of history and physical (H&P) notes that included a statement of the anticipated 36-hour antibiotic discontinuation time (36-hour phrase), and length of stay. The process measure was the use of an illness-specific H&P template or an influencer smartphrase. Balancing measures were readmissions for positive culture results. Interventions included education, an illness-specific H&P template, a criteria-based rule to default to this H&P template, and editing influencer smartphrases. RESULTS: Over 33 months, 311 patients were included. Percentage of patients who received >30 hours of administered antibiotic doses decreased from 75.6% to 62%. Percentage of H&P notes documenting the 36-hour phrase increased from 4.9% to 75.6%. Illness-specific H&P template and influencer smartphrase usage increased to a mean of 51.5%; length of stay did not change. No readmissions for positive culture results were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical decision support techniques and educational interventions popularized the "36-hour phrase" and were associated with a reduction in the antibiotic exposure in infants with negative culture results hospitalized for sepsis evaluation.

Improving Standardization of Paging Communication Using Quality Improvement Methodology.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Paging is a primary mode of communication in hospitals, but message quality varies. With this project, we aimed to standardize paging, thus improving end user (EU) satisfaction, patient safety, and efficiency. Objectives were to increase the percent of pages containing 6 critical elements (CEs) (ie, the sender's first and last name, a 7-digit callback number, patient name, room number, and urgency indicator [information only, call, or come] to 90%); improve EU satisfaction to 80% rating paging communication as good or excellent; and decrease the frequency of safety events related to paging. METHODS: This multidisciplinary, system-wide quality improvement study was conducted at our stand-alone academic children's hospital. CEs were determined by EU consensus. Outcome measures were inclusion of all 6 CEs, provider satisfaction, and frequency of safety events. Process measures were inclusion of individual CEs and appropriateness and timeliness of response to pages. Balancing measures included number of work-arounds (WAs). Interventions included education, engineering a platform with required fields, and optimization enhancements. Statistical process control charts (p-charts; XmR) were used to track the impact of interventions. RESULTS: Special-cause improvement was noted in use of all 6 CEs (4.4%-79.7%) and individual CEs. EU satisfaction improved from 50% to 85% rating paging communication as good or excellent. Safety events related to paging remain infrequent. Specific WA use decreased by 60%. CONCLUSIONS: System-wide use of required fields produced significant improvement in inclusion of all 6 CEs and EU satisfaction. WAs were curbed by improving the ease of CE incorporation. Required fields should be considered at institutions seeking improved paging communication.

Project IMPACT Pilot Report: Feasibility of Implementing a Hospital-to-Home Transition Bundle.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To improve hospital to home transitions, a 4-element pediatric patient-centered transition bundle was developed, including: a transition readiness checklist; predischarge teach-back education; timely and complete written handoff to the primary care provider; and a postdischarge phone call. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of bundle implementation and report initial outcomes at 4 pilot sites. Outcome measures included postdischarge caregiver ability to teach-back key home management information and 30-day reuse rates. METHODS: A multisite, observational time series using multiple planned sequential interventions to implement bundle components with non-technology-supported and technology-supported patients. Data were collected via electronic health record reviews and during postdischarge phone calls. Statistical process control charts were used to assess outcomes. RESULTS: Four pilot sites implemented the bundle between January 2014 and May 2015 for 2601 patients, of whom 1394 had postdischarge telephone encounters. Improvement was noted in the implementation of all bundle elements with the transitions readiness checklist posing the greatest feasibility challenge. Phone contact connection rates were 69%. Caregiver ability to teach-back essential home management information postdischarge improved from 18% to 82%. No improvement was noted in reuse rates, which differed dramatically between technology-supported and non-technology-supported patients. CONCLUSIONS: A pediatric care transition bundle was successfully tested and implemented, as demonstrated by improvement in all process measures, as well as caregiver home management skills. Important considerations for successful implementation and evaluation of the discharge bundle include the role of local context, electronic health record integration, and subgroup analysis for technology-supported patients.

Validity of respiratory scores in bronchiolitis.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to establish the validity and reliability of 2 respiratory scores, the Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI) and the Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Respiratory Score (CHWRS), in bronchiolitis. A secondary objective was to identify the respiratory score components that most determine overall respiratory status. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study in infants aged < 1 year seen at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin for bronchiolitis. We evaluated: (1) discriminative validity (the score's ability to discriminate between 2 different outcomes) of the respiratory scores to identify emergency department (ED) disposition by using receiver operating characteristic curves; and (2) construct validity (the score's ability to measure what it is thought to measure, overall respiratory status) by using length of stay (LOS) as a proxy for disease severity and comparing correlations between changes in respiratory scores and LOS. Interrater reliability was established by using intraclass correlation. The contribution of individual respiratory score components to determine ED disposition was studied by using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 195 infants were included. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.68 for CHWRS versus 0.51 for RDAI in predicting disposition. There was no correlation between initial respiratory scores or change in respiratory scores over the first 24 hours and LOS. Item analysis revealed that oxygen delivery, subcostal retractions, and respiratory rate were independently correlated with ED disposition. The CHWRS was more reliable than the RDAI. CONCLUSIONS: The CHWRS had modest discriminative validity in predicting ED disposition. Neither the CHWRS nor the RDAI had good construct validity. Respiratory rate, oxygen need, and presence of retractions were most useful in predicting ED disposition.