ABSTRACT
We experimentally investigated the influence of developmental plasticity of ultraviolet (UV) visual sensitivity on predation efficiency of the larval smooth newt, Lissotriton vulgaris. We quantified expression of SWS1 opsin gene (UV-sensitive protein of photoreceptor cells) in the retinas of individuals who had developed in the presence (UV+) or absence (UV-) of UV light (developmental treatments), and tested their predation efficiency under UV+ and UV- light (testing treatments). We found that both SWS1 opsin expression and predation efficiency were significantly reduced in the UV- developmental group. Larvae in the UV- testing environment displayed consistently lower predation efficiency regardless of their developmental treatment. These results prove for the first time, we believe, functional UV vision and developmental plasticity of UV sensitivity in an amphibian at the larval stage. They also demonstrate that UV wavelengths enhance predation efficiency and suggest that the magnitude of the behavioural response depends on retinal properties induced by the developmental lighting environment.
Subject(s)
Predatory Behavior/radiation effects , Salamandridae/physiology , Ultraviolet Rays , Visual Perception/radiation effects , Amphibian Proteins/genetics , Amphibian Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Gene Expression , Larva/genetics , Larva/growth & development , Larva/physiology , Larva/radiation effects , Opsins/genetics , Opsins/metabolism , Salamandridae/genetics , Salamandridae/growth & developmentABSTRACT
We describe a non-invasive, PCR-RFLP-based method that allows reliable determination of the European water frog species Pelophylax lessonae and Pelophylax ridibundus and the hybrid form Pelophylax esculentus. Maximum-likelihood analysis of ITS2 sequences revealed two robust monophyletic clades corresponding to water frogs of the P. lessonae and P. ridibundus groups. Three restriction enzymes (KpnI, HaeII, and SmaI) were used to digest three conserved ITS2 domains. Taxonomic identification was unambiguous; the three restriction enzymes gave the same results. A French reference sample was identified using allozyme electrophoresis. Our PCR-RFLP method confirmed circa 83% of identification of the allozyme method. We conclude that the difference between identifications was caused by introgression.
