Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 18: e191504, jan.-dez. 2019. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-1094897

ABSTRACT

Aim: evaluate the influence of etching time with hydrofluoric acid on the bond strength of a Yttrium-stabilized polycrystalline tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) ceramic with a superficial glaze layer and a resin cement. Methods: Y-TZP blocks were cut to obtain 40 samples. They were distributed into four groups (n = 10): control treated by sandblasting with silica-coated alumina (RS) and three glazed experimental groups with different etching times: GS20s, GS60s and GS100s. Cementation was done with a universal adhesive and a resin cement. Two cement cylinders were made in each block. After thermocycling, the shear bond test was performed. Two extra samples of each group were made to obtain profilometry, scanning electron microscopy, mapping and backscattered electron detector images. Energy dispersive spectrometry and goniometry were also performed. Results: Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests demonstrated bond strength differences only between the RS (22.10MPa) and the GS groups (GS20s: 8,10Mpa; GS60s: 10.49MPa; GS100s: 7.53MPa) (p = 0.001), but there was no difference among the experimental groups (p > 0.05). The contact angles were 55.33º (RS); 70.78° (GS100s); 48.20º (GS60s) and 28.73º (GS20s). ANOVA and Tukey test demonstrated similar wettability of RS to GS60s and GS100s (p > 0.05), but all the experimental groups were statistically different between them (p < 0.001). Qualitative image analysis revealed an irregular glaze distribution after etching. The thickness of the remaining glaze layer measured by profilometry was 5±1µm (GS20S), 4±1µm (GS60S) and 3±1µm (GS100s). Conclusion: The etching time of glazed zirconia did not influence the adhesive strength of the ceramic to the resin cement


Subject(s)
Zirconium , Dental Cements , Glass
2.
Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr ; 4(1): 59-63, jan.-abr. 2004. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-872750

ABSTRACT

O presente trabalho se propôs a comparar a resistência da união de diferentes materiais restauradores (TPH«, Solitaire«,P60«, Vitremer« e Compoglass«) à dentina, quando submetidos à força de cisalhamento. Para tanto, procedeu-se o aplanamento das faces vestibulares de 60 incisivos bovinos(grupos de 12 amostras), que foram presos pelas suas raízesaté o colo, com gesso, em tubos de PVC, dispondo-se a superfície exposta verticalmente à base do anel. Em seguida,adaptou-se na área de colagem arruela de borracha com orifício central de 4mm, que foi preenchido pelos distintos materiais, segundo as instruções do fabricante. A descolagem foi realizada em máquina Kratos, com velocidade de 1,0mm/min., sendo os resultados submetidos à análise estatística pelo teste não paramétrico de Kruskal-Wallis (p<0,05). Obtevese os seguintes resultados (MPa), expressos em valor mediano: TPH« 6,38; Compoglass« 6,14; P60 4,20; Solitaire«3,07; Vitremer« 1,75. Conclui-se que, nas condições experimentais do estudo, a adesão da resina convencional e do compômero foi significantemente mais elevada quando comparada àquela obtida com os demais materiais, enquanto que o ionômero resinoso apresentou a menor resistência adesiva


Subject(s)
Dentin-Bonding Agents/analysis , Dentin , Dental Materials/analysis , Shear Strength , Glass Ionomer Cements , Statistics, Nonparametric
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...