Prompted voiding treatment of urinary incontinence in nursing home patients. A behavior management approach for nursing home staff.

This study evaluated a treatment procedure in which 126 incontinent nursing home patients were checked on an hourly basis, asked if they needed toileting assistance (prompted), and socially reinforced for appropriate toileting. Urodynamic analysis (including cystometrogram), provocative stress test, and behavioral assessment revealed that the nursing home patients were severely debilitated, with 65% demonstrating bladder abnormalities, 87% incapable of independent toileting, and 25% failing to score on the Mini-Mental Status Exam (average score, 8.0). The treatment procedures were evaluated with a multiple baseline design in which subjects were randomly divided into immediate or delayed treatment groups after a baseline observation period. During treatment, the frequency of incontinence per 12 hours changed from a baseline average of 3.85 to a treatment average of 1.91. Three behavioral measures that can be easily collected by nursing staff significantly predicted continence levels during treatment (multiple R, 0.79) and change in incontinence during treatment (multiple R, 0.64). These prognostic criteria offer nursing staff a cost-effective method for selecting the most responsive patients for prompted-voiding treatment.

Reduction of urinary incontinence in nursing homes: does it reduce or increase costs?

Labor and supply costs associated with the care of urinary incontinent patients in three nursing homes were measured. First, normal nursing home changing patterns and their associated costs were measured. Second, the costs were documented when patients were checked by research staff and changed on an hourly basis as needed. Nursing home staff changed patients significantly less frequently than patient voiding as detected by the hourly checking system. Thus, cost of incontinence during the hourly checking condition ($3.35) per 12-hour patient-day was significantly higher than the cost normally incurred in nursing homes ($1.52) per 12-hour patient-day. The cost of an incontinence rehabilitation program, which significantly reduced incontinence episodes, was contrasted to the cost of incontinence as measured under both of the previous conditions. The rehabilitation program produced significant labor and supply savings only when compared with the hourly checking and changing system. Maintaining patients in a more continent condition costs significantly more than the direct incontinence cost normally incurred by the nursing home. Quality of life and other second-order benefits must be considered if continence rehabilitation is to be judged cost-effective.