Diepoxy- Versus Glutaraldehyde-Treated Xenografts: Outcomes of Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction in Children.

BACKGROUND: Xenografts used for right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction are typically treated with glutaraldehyde. However, potential benefit of epoxy treatment was demonstrated in experimental studies. We aimed to compare diepoxy-treated bovine pericardial valved conduits (DE-PVCs) and glutaraldehyde-treated bovine pericardial valved conduits (GA-PVCs) for RVOT reconstruction in pediatric patients. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2017, 117 patients underwent RVOT reconstruction with PVC in single center: DE-PVC group, n = 39; and GA-PVC group, n = 78. After performing propensity score analysis (1:1) for the entire sample, 29 patients from the DE-PVC group were matched with 29 patients from the GA-PVC group. RESULTS: There were no conduit-related deaths. In the DE-PVC group, the freedom from conduit failure was 90.9% at four years and 54.3% at eight years postoperatively. In the GA-PVC group, it was 46.3% and 33.1%, respectively. The difference was significant (P = .037). Conduit failure was typically caused by stenosis in both groups. In the DE-PVC group, the main cause of stenosis was xenograft calcification (27.6%); while in the GA-PVC group, it was mostly due to neointimal proliferation (25.0%) and, less often, calcification (14.3%). Conduit thrombosis was the cause of replacement in 6.9% of patients from the GA-PVC group. CONCLUSIONS: Diepoxy-treated bovine pericardial valved conduit is a suitable alternative to GA-PVC for RVOT reconstruction in pediatric patients. Diepoxy-treated bovine pericardial valved conduits may be less prone to conduit failure and more resistant to neointimal proliferation and conduit thrombosis than GA-PVCs.

In search of the best xenogeneic material for a paediatric conduit: an analysis of clinical data.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to determine the incidence of reintervention and calcification of xenografts in paediatric patients who underwent placement of the right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery valved conduits. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed clinical data of paediatric patients (1 day-18 years) who underwent right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction using xenograft from 2000 to 2016 at a single centre. RESULTS: A total of 301 patients underwent the placement of 337 xenografts, including glutaraldehyde-treated bovine jugular vein (n = 171, 50.7%), glutaraldehyde-treated bovine pericardial valved conduit (n = 75, 22.3%), diepoxy-treated porcine aortic conduit (n = 58, 17.2%) and diepoxy-treated bovine pericardial valved conduit (DE-PVC) (n = 33, 9.8%). There were 284 (84.3%) primary implantations and 53 (15.7%) reimplantations. The median follow-up was 4.2 years (range 1.5 months-14.5 years). The multivariate regression analysis did not reveal statistically significant associations of the first reintervention with the type of xenograft (P = 0.78). At reintervention, calcification of the wall and/or cusps was the main cause of conduit dysfunction in 66.4% of cases. On the basis of the multivariate Cox regression analysis, xenograft types were significant predictors of reintervention caused by conduit calcification (P = 0.012). The diepoxy-treated porcine aortic conduit group had the risk of calcification 3 times higher than the glutaraldehyde-treated bovine jugular vein group (P < 0.001).The glutaraldehyde-treated bovine pericardial valved conduit and diepoxy-treated bovine pericardial valved conduit groups had the risk of calcification comparable with the glutaraldehyde-treated bovine jugular vein group in multivariate proportional hazards model (P = 0.36 and P = 0.59, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We have not revealed significant difference in the freedom from first reintervention among types of conduit. Calcification leading to the conduit dysfunction was present in all groups; however, diepoxy-treated porcine aortic conduits demonstrated suboptimal results in terms of calcification at follow-up.