From second webspace syndrome to second cross over toe: Clinical and radiological findings following Weil osteotomy with no soft tissue procedure.

BACKGROUND: The second webspace syndrome (SWS) refers to the progressive divergence between 2nd and 3rd toes associated with pain at the second intermetatarsal space that can be confused with Morton's neuroma and treated as such without considering the underlying deformity. There is yet no consensus regarding the best treatment, from isolated soft tissue or bony procedures or a combination of both. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of the disease, as well as to evaluate the radiological outcomes of patients with SWS treated with open Weil's osteotomy or distal metatarsal minimal invasive osteotomy (DMMO) of the second metatarsal, with main emphasis on medialization of the head in the anteroposterior plane in either procedure. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients with SWS treated with Weil's medializing osteotomy (open and percutaneous) associated or not with other forefoot procedures, treated between 2012 and 2019, was performed. Radiological variables such as metatarsal-phalangeal angle (MTPA), percentage of metatarsal uncoverage of M2 with respect to its phalanx, intermetatarsal angle (M1, M2 and M3), length of second metatarsal and intermetatarsal distance M2 - M3 were measured and compared before and after surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 26 months. All patients presented divergence between the 2nd and 3rd toes, 75 % associated pain at the level of the second intermetatarsal space and two patients presented neuropathic symptoms. After surgery (nineteen open and seven DMMO), all patients rated their results as good or excellent, and the two patients with neuropathic symptoms had improvement in their symptoms. Regarding the radiological results, the percentage of subluxation of the second MTP decreased in a large percentage of the operated patients (from 43.3 % to 3.9 %) with statistical significance as well as the length of M2, IM angle between M1 - M2, IM distance between M2-M3 and the percentage of uncoverage of the second MTP (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Medial translation associated with open Weil osteotomy or DMMO seems to correct the muscle-ligament imbalance of the second metatarsophalangeal joint and restore normal radiographic measurements, especially in the coronal and sagittal plane, without the need for soft tissue procedures, as well as the resolution of associated neuropathic symptoms in some patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty: Does the CT-scan have any role? Our Algorithm proposal.

Introduction: The first surgical option considered in managing iliopsoas impingement following THA is endoscopic/arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomy, because of its low risk and minimal invasiveness. Acetabular revision is a much more aggressive surgery, recommended only in cases of substantial cup malposition. However, there are no clear indications for this procedure. The purpose of this article is to analyse the role of CT-scan measurement of acetabular cup positioning in a therapeutic algorithm for iliopsoas impingement. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we reviewed 25 patients treated for iliopsoas impingement following THA between 2011 and 2019. We studied acetabular cup positioning using CT-scan. We compared radiological parameters of patients who presented with significant clinical improvement with conservative treatment and with tenotomy against those who did not. Finally, we developed a proposed therapeutic algorithm. Results: Forty-eight percent of patients presented a significant clinical improvement following conservative treatment. Patients who did not improve were found to have greater acetabular cup axial and sagittal overhang (p-values 0.016 and 0.003). These patients were considered for tenotomy. Of this group, those who did not improve with surgery (38%) showed greater axial overhang (p-value 0.005). Conclusions: Conservative management should be the first line of treatment. In cases of non-operative treatment failure, axial acetabular cup overhang measured by CT-scan can be a useful tool in choosing between iliopsoas tenotomy or cup-revision surgery in selected cases of very severe acetabular malposition. A cut-off point of 10 mm of axial overhang is a reliable predictor of higher failure risk with iliopsoas tenotomy.

A comparative of a single novice surgeon's direct anterior approach and posterior approach learning curves in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to compare a novice surgeon's learning curves with the direct anterior approach and posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: A consecutive series of 376 total hip arthroplasties performed from November 2014 to September 2019 in a level-one healthcare center by a single surgeon (V.B) were retrospectively studied. Demographic data, functional outcomes, and complications were collected and compared. RESULTS: Within the ranks of the patients studied, we found differences between groups with respect to dislocation rate and length of stay; these were lower in the direct anterior approach (DAA) group. The approach was not associated with an increase in complications, but rather with a decrease in the rate of dislocations and better functional outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Operative time was initially higher with this approach, but equalized during the learning curve. CONCLUSION: The DAA can be safe even in the early stages of a novice surgeon's learning curve. It does not present a higher complication rate than the posterior approach, either in infection rate or in periprosthetic fractures. However, the DAA may provide greater functionality, lower dislocation rate and a shorter hospital stay. It can also be concluded that after having performed a certain number of interventions, operative time for the DAA can be comparable to that of other approaches.

Restoring hip biomechanics during the learning curve of a novice surgeon: Direct anterior approach vs posterior approach.

INTRODUCTION: It remains controversial whether the direct anterior approach (DAA) or the posterior approach (PA) allows better restoration of hip biomechanics after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Besides, it is not certain which approach is best for a novice surgeon to avoid implant malposition, neither during the learning curve nor once the curve plateau has been reached. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of THAs operated on between 2014 and 2019 by a single novice surgeon (DAA, n = 187; PA, n = 184). The surgeon used both approaches, and thus went through parallel learning curves. RESULTS: While the DAA presented a greater number of acetabular cup implantations within Lewinnek's "safe zone" for inclination (84.5% vs. 79.3%; p = 0.003), the PA returned superior results for anteversion (77.7% vs. 68.4%; p = 0.000). The PA showed a tendency to verticalize acetabular cups, while the DAA tended to antevert them. The DAA resulted in fewer patients with leg length discrepancy (3.2% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.041). No differences were found in stem coronal alignment or femoral offset. CONCLUSION: Both approaches are safe and reliable for restoring hip biomechanics through THA surgery during the learning curve of a novice hip surgeon. Similar radiological outcomes are also seen once the surgeon has reached the learning curve plateau.

Checkrein deformity: a case report of two patients with hallux deformity and pain following mandibular reconstruction in oral cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: Checkrein deformity is an uncommon disease with a well-described etiology. It is characterized by a dynamic deformity of the hallux or great toe. We report two cases of checkrein deformity due a fibular graft harvesting in two patients with a mandibular bone defect secondary to an oral cancer treatment. CASE REPORT: We report two young patients with mandibular cancers that had been treated several years before our visit and were currently free of disease. The patients had a mandibular bone defect due to the maxillofacial treatment, solved with a free fibular graft. The current complaint was a great toe deformity that caused pain and made them walk with difficulties. Diagnosis was a checkrein deformity, and after a surgical release of the flexor hallucis longus tendon, both cases returned to normal activities with no walking limitations. CONCLUSION: Our cases highlight that an accurate patient examination is warranted following these reconstructions as many of them can be misdiagnosed, and a relatively simple surgery can improve the patients' limitations.