Histogram-based analysis in progressive pulmonary fibrosis: relationships between pulmonary functional tests and HRCT indexes.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate relationships between histogram-based high-resolution CT (HRCT) indexes and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in interstitial lung diseases. METHODS: Forty-nine patients having baseline and 1-year HRCT examinations and PFTs were investigated. Histogram-based HRCT indexes were calculated; strength of associations with PFTs was investigated using Pearson correlation. Patients were divided into progressive and non-progressive groups. HRCT indexes were compared between the two groups using the U-test; within each group, baseline and follow-up Wilcoxon analysis was performed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used for predicting disease progression. RESULTS: At baseline, moderate correlations were observed considering kurtosis and diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (r = 0.54) and skewness and DLCO (r = 0.559), whereas weak but significant correlations were observed between forced vital capacity and kurtosis (r = 0.368, p = 0.009) and forced vital capacity and skewness (r = 0.391, p = 0.005). Negative correlations were reported between HAA% and PFTs (from r = -0.418 up to r = -0.507). At follow-up correlations between quantitative indexes and PFTs were also moderate, except for high attenuation area (HAA)% -700 and DLCO (r = -0.397). In progressive subgroup, moderate and strong correlations were found between DLCO and HRCT indexes (r = 0.595 kurtosis, r = 0.672 skewness, r=-0. 598 HAA% -600 and r = -0.626 HAA% -700). At follow-up, we observed significant differences between the two groups for kurtosis (p = 0.029), HAA% -600 (p = 0.04) and HAA% -700 (p = 0.02). To predict progression, ROC analysis reported sensitivity of 90.9% and specificity of 51.9% using a threshold value of δ kurtosis <0.03. CONCLUSION: At one year, moderate correlations suggest that progression could be assessed through HRCT quantification. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study promotes histogram-based HRCT indexes in the assessment of progressive pulmonary fibrosis.

A New Method for the Assessment of Myalgia in Interstitial Lung Disease: Association with Positivity for Myositis-Specific and Myositis-Associated Antibodies.

In this study, it was found that myositis-specific and myositis-associated antibodies (MSAs and MAAs) improved the recognition of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. The objective of this study is to propose a clinical method to evaluate myalgia in respiratory settings as a possible tool for the recognition of MSA/MAA positivity in ILD patients. We prospectively enrolled 167 ILD patients with suspected myositis, of which 63 had myalgia evoked at specific points (M+ILD+). We also enrolled in a 174 patients with only myalgia (M+ILD-) in a rheumatological setting. The patients were assessed jointly by rheumatologists and pulmonologists and were tested for autoantibodies. M+ILD+ patients were positive for at least one MAA/MSA in 68.3% of cases, as were M-ILD+ patients in 48.1% of cases and M+ILD- patients in 17.2% of cases (p = 0.01 and <0.0001, respectively). A diagnosis of IIM was made in 39.7% of M+ILD+ patients and in 23.1% of the M-ILD+ group (p = 0.02). Myalgia was significantly associated with positivity for MSA/MAAs in ILD patients (p = 0.01, X2: 6.47). In conclusion, myalgia in ILD patients with suspected myositis is associated with MSA/MAA positivity, and could support a diagnosis of IIM. A significant proportion of M+ILD- patients also had MSA/MAA positivity, a phenomenon warranting further study to evaluate its clinical meaning.

"Usual" interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features: a prospective study on a cohort of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients.

OBJECTIVES: The classification interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) includes patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with autoimmune characteristics insufficient to reach classification criteria for a specific autoimmune disease (SAD). These criteria are divided into three domains: clinical, serological and morphological. The latter domain does not include the usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern, which is deemed not to be significantly associated with SAD. Therefore, the enrolment of these patients is more difficult, requiring at least one item from both of the other domains. The objective of this study is to evaluate the rate of progression towards SAD of a cohort of UIP patients satisfying only one IPAF domain (we called this group "UIPAF") compared with classic idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled IPF patients with radiologic and/or histologic UIP pattern, followed jointly by rheumatologists and pulmonologists from January 2017 to January 2021, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: We enrolled 190 IPF patients, 38 (20%) of whom were classified as UIPAF. IPF and UIPAF patients were similar for general characteristics, severity and prognosis, at presentation and at annual check-up. However, 28.9% of UIPAF patients progressed towards SAD, compared with 2% of IPF patients (χ2=30.4, p≤0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The association between a single clinical or serological domain of IPAF and UIP pattern is predictive for the development of a SAD if compared with isolated UIP. ILD can be the first manifestation of SAD, even with a UIP pattern, therefore, the morphological domain of IPAF criteria could be removed.