Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(5)2024 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38793724

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has globally disrupted immunisation practices, impacting vulnerable populations such as pregnant women (PW), who harbour concerns about future children's immunisations. This study aimed to assess the pandemic's impact on PW's attitudes towards childhood vaccinations. During three consecutive flu seasons from October 2019 to January 2022, a cross-sectional study was conducted in a large Italian teaching hospital using a questionnaire. The chi-square test was performed to compare each season. Across the 2019-2020 to 2021-2022 seasons, course attendance by PW surged from 105 to 340. Significant shifts in vaccination intentions were noted, including a 7.5% decrease in measles vaccination intent (p = 0.02) and a 10% decrease in that of pertussis (p = 0.004) from 2019-2020 to 2020-2021. While perceived contagion risk decreased, disease severity perceptions increased, with few significant differences. A statistically significant reduction was noted in the proportion of participants suspecting economic motives behind NHS workers' promotion of childhood vaccinations. Furthermore, the pandemic period saw an increase in the perceived utility of non-institutional websites and the advice of physicians outside the NHS. These findings will help develop evidence-based, tailored interventions and communication strategies to address vaccine hesitancy and ensure optimal vaccination coverage among children born during and after the pandemic.

2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2330152, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38533904

ABSTRACT

Infectious diseases pose a significant burden on the general population, particularly older adults who are more susceptible to severe complications. Immunization plays a crucial role in preventing infections and securing a healthier aging, but actual vaccination rates among older adults and frail individuals (OAFs) remains far from recommended targets. This study aims to collect and share good practices implemented in several Italian local health districts during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic to ease routine immunization for OAFs. A 28-items questionnaire has been developed to collect information on organization aspect of immunization services and local good practices implemented before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Twelve Public Health managers representative of 9 Italian Regions were further interviewed between January and March 2021. Despite literature suggests several effective interventions to increase vaccine demand, improve vaccine access, and enhance healthcare providers' performance, our survey highlighted substantial heterogeneity in their implementation at local level. Seven good local practices have been identified and described: mass vaccination centers; vaccination mobile units; drive-through vaccination; co-administration; tailored pathways; cooperation among providers involved in vaccination; digitization. Our survey pointed out valuable strategies for enhancing routine immunization for OAFs. Providers should combine effective interventions adequate to their specific context and share good practices.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Humans , Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Frail Elderly , COVID-19/epidemiology , Vaccination , Immunization , Italy/epidemiology , Immunization Programs
3.
Front Public Health ; 10: 903557, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35991061

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy threatens the health of populations and challenges Public Health professionals. Strategies to reduce it aim to improve people's risk perception about vaccine-preventable diseases, fill knowledge gaps about vaccines and increase trust in healthcare providers. During pregnancy, educational interventions can provide a proper knowledge about safety and efficacy of maternal and childhood vaccinations. Fighting hesitancy and clarifying doubts is fundamental during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have affected people's knowledge and beliefs toward vaccination. This study aimed at assessing if the advent of the pandemic was associated with changes in pregnant women's knowledge and beliefs toward vaccination, and trust in healthcare services. Methods: A repeated cross-sectional study was conducted through self-reported questionnaires in a Roman teaching hospital, where educational classes about vaccinations are routinely held as part of a birthing preparation course. Data were collected on a sample of pregnant women before and during the pandemic. Free-of-charge flu vaccinations were offered to all course participants and adherence to flu vaccination was assessed. Results: The proportion of pregnant women reporting that vaccines have mild side effects and that are sufficiently tested increased from 78.6 to 92.0% (p = 0.001) and from 79.4 to 93.2% (p = 0.001), respectively. There was a reduction from 33.0 to 23.3% (p = 0.065) in the proportion of those declaring that healthcare workers (HCWs) give information only on the benefits and not on the risks of vaccines, and a reduction from 27.3 to 12.1% (p = 0.001) in those reporting that vaccines are an imposition and not a free choice of mothers. Trust in National Health Service (NHS) operators slightly decreased. Among participants, the monthly flu vaccination adherence ranged from 50.0% in November to 29.2% January for 2019-20 flu season, and from 56.3% in September to 14.5% in January for 2020-21 flu season, showing a higher vaccination acceptance in the earlier months of 2020-21 flu season. Conclusions: The pandemic may have positively affected pregnant women's knowledge and opinions about vaccinations and trust in HCWs, despite a possible negative impact on their perceptions about NHS operators. This should inspire Public Health professionals to rethink their role as health communicators.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , State Medicine , Vaccination
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34070427

ABSTRACT

In 2013, in a bid to combat Vaccine Hesitancy (VH) and provide information on vaccines by communicating with the general public and the health community (e.g., healthcare workers and public health operators), the Italian Society of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine (S.It.I.) published the national website "VaccinarSì". The project was subsequently extended to ten Italian Regions. This led to the creation of the VaccinarSì Network, whose websites are publicly owned. The aim of this work was to present the framework of the websites of the VaccinarSì Network and to analyse user behaviour in the pre-COVID-19-era (dating from each website's publication until 31 January 2020) and in the COVID-19-era (from 1 February 2020 to 31 January 2021). Some metrics such as the number of visits to the site (sessions, number of users and average session duration), user behaviour (pages viewed, bounce rate and organic search) and the session acquisition path (direct traffic, referrals and social traffic) were searched, extrapolated and processed with Google Analytics. Qualitative and normally distributed quantitative variables were summarised with their absolute (relative) frequencies and means. Statistical differences between the means of the two periods were evaluated through paired t-test. A two-tailed p-value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. When the total values recorded over the period were compared, an overall increase in metrics was observed-the number of individual users, visits and individual pageviews rose in a statistically significant way. Our study aimed to highlight how combining disciplines such as health education and digital communication via Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) represents the best strategy to support citizens. This approach gives them the tools to become independent and responsible players that are capable of voluntarily and consciously choosing to adhere to vaccination programs. The VaccinarSì Network's goal for the future is to reach an even wider audience. By building each user's critical knowledge, this network enables users to be active components of a wider, more empowered community.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Communication , Vaccines , Communication , Humans , Italy , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 9(2)2021 Feb 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33670085

ABSTRACT

Most vaccinations are recommended within the 15th month of life, in order to reduce risks and to protect children from the initial stages of their lives. A vaccination training session was carried out during the birthing preparation course, aimed at increasing the attitude toward vaccination in maternal-child age. A questionnaire on vaccination awareness was administered before and after the training session and on-site flu vaccination was offered to women and their companions. The percentage of participants who consider the preparatory course a useful tool to obtain information about vaccines increases significantly from 30.34% at pre-intervention to 64.56% at post-intervention (p < 0.001). There is a significant increase in the mean number of vaccinations that the participants want their children to get. The number of participants believing that there is no relationship between vaccination and autism rose from 41.05 to 72.97% (p < 0.001). In total, 48 out of 119 (40.34%) pregnant women participating in the course and 39 companions were vaccinated for influenza. Vaccination knowledge and attitude significantly increased after a training session dedicated to vaccination as a part of the pregnant pre-birth course, whose aim can be therefore extended to the management of the health of the child, well beyond the period of pregnancy, according to the life-course approach to health.

6.
Ig Sanita Pubbl ; 75(2): 158-173, 2019.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31377759

ABSTRACT

Vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) is a public health tool of the utmost importance and the Italian National Vaccine Prevention Plan (PNPV) 2017-2019 recommends several vaccinations in this population group. Nevertheless, vaccine hesitancy is influencing HCWs' attitude towards vaccination. Moreover, a large number of measles cases have been reported in Italy among HCWs in 2017 and 2018. In Italy there is no national registry for vaccinations, so data on vaccine coverage among HCWs are not readily accessible. The aim of this literature review is to describe the most recent data about vaccination coverage among HCWs in Italy. We also report studies that evaluated the effectiveness of strategies to increase influenza vaccine uptake. We included all studies conducted in Italy and published between 2008 and 2018, regarding vaccines recommended by the PNPV 2017-2019 (hepatitis B, influenza, pertussis, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, and tuberculosis). Our findings confirm that low vaccination coverage levels among HCWs exist in several Italian regions and cities, highlighting a relevant gap towards targets set by the PNPV. Studies that evaluated the effectiveness of multicomponent interventions to increase vaccination coverage found only minimal to moderate increases in uptake levels. It is therefore crucial to tackle vaccine hesitancy in HCWs, by identifying effective strategies able to significantly increase vaccine coverage, in order to decrease the risk of nosocomial infections, prevent transmission of preventable diseases to patients, and reduce indirect costs related to HCW absenteeism due to illness.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Health Personnel , Vaccination , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Italy , Vaccines
7.
Ann Ist Super Sanita ; 55(2): 124-130, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31264635

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Italy, the National Immunization Prevention Plan recommends for adolescents between ages 11 and 18 several vaccines, however their adherence is below the expected coverage. School-based delivery strategies might represent an alternative to primary care settings. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a school-based intervention aimed to increase the vaccination uptake among Italian secondary class students. METHODS: One of the four schools in which a school-based multicomponent intervention was previously carried out has been matched with a control school in the same geographical area. Students' coverage for mandatory and recommended vaccinations was assessed before and after an 8 months period using the Local Health Authority Immunization Register. RESULTS: Seven hundred and fifty-five resident students in the RM Local Health Authority were included: 265 from the intervention school, 490 from the control school. At baseline, the two schools were comparable for grades and sex distribution; the intervention school had significant higher immunization rates for Meningococcal B, but lower ones for the 4th dose of dTap. After eight months, higher percentage of students received the HPV (30.5% vs 13.8% of females; p = 0.003) Meningococcal C (6.0% vs 2.0%; p = 0.005) and Meningococcal B (14.7% vs 0.3%; p <0.001) vaccines in the intervention school compared with control. The pre-post differences between the two schools in the immunization rates were significantly higher in the intervention school for the HPV, Meningococcal C and B vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a school-based health promotion project was effective in improving the recommended vaccines uptake among adolescents with potential interesting implication for the national target attainment. Considering the importance of informing and educating, innovative school-based health promotion programs could represent an excellent opportunity for the Local Health Authorities to get in touch with a hard-to-reach target. Performance in offering the vaccination in school facilities should be evaluated.


Subject(s)
Immunization Programs , School Health Services/organization & administration , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adolescent Behavior , Child , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Meningococcal Vaccines , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Procedures and Techniques Utilization , Program Evaluation , Retrospective Studies , Vaccination/legislation & jurisprudence , Vaccination/psychology , Vaccination Coverage
8.
BMC Public Health ; 18(1): 1401, 2018 Dec 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30577729

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surveillance for adverse events following immunization is an important component of any national immunization programme because it is critical to assessing the safety of vaccines and to detecting potentially rare and severe adverse events and responding in a timely manner. We conducted an enhanced active surveillance aimed at assessing the safety of flu vaccines in the 2015-2016 season in Italy. The study was targeted to the population groups for which the seasonal vaccine is recommended in Italy. METHODS: During the study period, a total of 3213 individuals receiving seasonal influenza vaccination were registered on the web-based platform. Any adverse events experienced after 7 days from vaccination by individuals aged six months or more were collected through a telephone interview or by a web-based self-administered questionnaire. All individuals experiencing at least one event during the 7 days of follow-up were contacted for follow-up to 60 days. RESULTS: Overall, 854 events were reported: 845 events (26%) after administration of the first dose and 9 (12%) after the second dose. The majority of adverse events reported after 7 days from the first dose were of little clinical importance, and most involved local symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our data, even though the number of vaccinated individuals was smaller than expected, is consistent with the safety of influenza vaccines in Italy during the 2015-2016 season regarding the most common adverse events. Further efforts are needed to obtain sufficient power to study rarer adverse events. Active monitoring and systematic studies to test generated signals and hypotheses are crucial to intensify awareness among the public and professionals with regard to the safety of vaccines.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Immunization Programs , Infant , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Seasons , Young Adult
9.
Ig Sanita Pubbl ; 74(4): 349-357, 2018.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30767950

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore the nutrition and food habits of toddlers, in order to develop interventions to promote healthy eating starting from the early years of life. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study among 204 children aged from 3 months to 3 years, registered in 10 nursery schools in Rome, Italy. Children's diet-related behaviors and parent's food attitudes were evaluated using a 10-item questionnaire for parents. After administering the questionnaire, pediatricians of the local health authority conducted motivational interviews with parents to encourage them to make their children adopt healthy behaviors at home. Descriptive and analytical statistical methods were used to evaluate dietary habits in children, after stratifying by nursery school grade attended. RESULTS: The data showed that unhealthy dietary habits occur even in nursery schoolaged children. In particular, over 50% of children were reported to watch TV while eating meals at home every day and to drink fruit juices at least 1-2 times per week. Unhealthy dietary habits were found to be more common among older children: there were significant differences in the proportions of older and younger children who consumed fruit juices or snacks more than twice per week (35.7% and 8.9% respectively of older children vs 3.3% and 3.3% respectively of younger children), who watched TV during meals (26.8% of older children versus 16.9% of younger children) and whose parents attribute a moral value to food as a reward more than twice a week (almost 14.3% of older children's parents vs 0.0% of small children's parents). On the contrary, older children were found to eat fruit significantly more frequently compared to younger children (51.8% vs 24.6% of young children ate fruit >2 times a week). Parents of children with at least one unhealthy behavior had low awareness of healthy dietary choices: 86.7% believed that their children's diets were healthy. CONCLUSION: This study showed that unhealthy dietary habits occur among Italian toddlers. These should be prevented by promoting specific interventions. Parents should be made aware of the possible consequences of their own behavior, considering that home food habits influence the development of dietary attitudes in children. Preventive interventions aimed at preschoolers may also be beneficial for parents themselves and for other family members.


Subject(s)
Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Diet , Feeding Behavior , Food Preferences/psychology , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Behavior , Humans , Infant , Male , Obesity , Rome
10.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 13(8): 1879-1883, 2017 08 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28604255

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine in reducing hospitalizations for infectious disease, targeted and not targeted, as well as from respiratory diseases in children in Rome. METHODS: The cohort was recomposed through record linkage of 2 archives (vaccination register and hospital discharge records. RESULTS: The analysis included 11,004 children. 20.9% did not receive the MMR vaccination, 49% and 30.1% received one and 2 doses. There were no hospitalizations for rubella, 2 for mumps, and 12 for measles. The vaccine was highly protective against measles and mumps hospitalizations (HR = 0.10; 95% CI: 0.03.0.34). Regarding all infectious diseases there were 414 hospitalizations, and the vaccine was protective (HR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.34). Concerning respiratory diseases, there were 809 admissions (7.4%), and the vaccine was highly protective (HR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: MMR vaccination is effective for the primary prevention of target and not targeted infectious diseases and may also limit hospitalizations for respiratory diseases.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Measles/prevention & control , Mumps/prevention & control , Rubella/prevention & control , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/virology , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/virology , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Rome/epidemiology , Rubella/epidemiology , Rubella/virology , Vaccination , Vaccines, Attenuated
11.
Ig Sanita Pubbl ; 73(1): 77-94, 2017.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28428646

ABSTRACT

Human Papillomavirus is responsible for 4.8% of cancers, and is the main cause of cervical cancer. Cervical cancer can be reduced by mean of secondary prevention (PAP-test, HPV-DNA test), while through primary prevention (anti-HPV vaccine) the incidence of other HPV-attributable cancers can also be reduced. In Italy, anti-HPV vaccination is part of the immunization schedule in girls since 2008, and in 2017 it was extended to boys. However, vaccine coverage is decreasing nationwide. This study aims to examine anti-HPV vaccination practices in Health care services of Lazio Region, Italy. Questionnaires were sent or administered directly to those in charge of vaccinations. Data, collected from 11/12 (92%) Lazio Local Health Units and from 116 vaccination centers, show a remarkable diversity in the offer: 41% of the centers open only 1-2 days/week, 42% only in the morning, and only 7% are open on Saturday. Vaccination is available by reservation only in 62% of the centers, while vaccines are not administered to ≥18 years subjects in 33%; 93% of the centers call actively the girls in the target cohort, while 70% and 94% recall the patients who had not received the first or the second dose of vaccine, respectively. Collaboration with family physicians and/or pediatricians was declared by 80% of the centers. Vaccine coverage could probably be improved by addressing the highlighted critical issues and applying best practices widely.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Italy , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Papanicolaou Test , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology
12.
Ig Sanita Pubbl ; 73(5): 507-521, 2017.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29433136

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Italian Ministry of Health has launched an alert about the reduction in vaccine coverage (VC), which decreased below 95% since 2014 for many paediatric vaccines, oppositely from the National Prevention Plan 2014-18 and the National Immunization Plan 2017-2019. Even though the growing vaccine hesitancy attracts the attention of the media in the last few years, the organization of an easily accessible and efficient supply network remains a crucial imperative for ensuring satisfactory and uniform vaccine coverage. Taking into consideration some critical issues identified within the vaccination centres of the Local Health Authority (ASL) RM/A, the local health management decided to improve the VC in deep collaboration with all the health professionals. The amelioration process includes the following actions: verifying the current situation, analysing the main concerns, evaluating the possible solution, and activating those already deemed feasible. This paper aims to describe in details the methodology used in the audit and to present the results and actions undertaken following this amelioration process. METHODS: In the ASL RM/A, which counts 550.000 inhabitants, all the 5 vaccination centres started from 2014 to carry out at least one 30-hour audit each year in order to improve VC. The audits are structured according to the four steps defined by the Ministry of Health to address systematically the critical points identified, by implementing the improvement actions proposed by the audit team to the health management. The audits, accredited under the ECM for the medical and nursing personnel, started in February 2014 and the last edition of the program was completed in December 2016. RESULTS: During 20 meetings the audit "Centri Vaccinali" involved 11 professionals from 5 vaccine centres, who acknowledged being highly satisfied with the audit, which has been recognized as a valuable tool for improving their work. Following the activities performed in the VC improvement programme, throughout the 3-years period an in-depth review of the most relevant procedures implemented daily by the involved experts was conducted. Moreover, the share of goals and deadlines among the various professionals has leaded to a positive and fruitful collaboration of all experts working in the vaccination centres. This was achieved without creating an additional burden deriving from the improvement process activities. The analysis conducted after two years from the start of the programme has shown not just a significant improvement in vaccine coverage, but also an important increase in the number of vaccine sessions and in the total number of administered vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: Throughout the described process of improvement, the collaboration among health care professionals was significantly improved and immunization strategies were identified and shared among the centres. The audit demonstrated to be an effective methodology for facilitating the accessibility and usage of vaccination centres by the citizen/user as well as by the healthcare providers. It showed a quick and significant improvement that, by promoting accountability and transparency, will ensure greater efficacy and safety of vaccine services.


Subject(s)
Immunization/standards , Management Audit , Vaccination Coverage/organization & administration , Vaccination Coverage/standards , Child , Efficiency, Organizational , Humans , Rome
13.
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis ; 8(1): e2016044, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27648207

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The risk of getting influenza and pneumococcal disease is higher in cancer patients, and serum antibody levels tend to be lower in patients with hematological malignancy. OBJECTIVE: To assess flu and pneumococcal vaccinations efficacy, effectiveness, and safety in onco-hematological patients. METHODS: Two systematic reviews and possible meta-analysis were conducted to summarize the results of all primary study in the scientific literature about the flu and pneumococcal vaccine in onco-hematological patients. Literature searches were performed using Pub-Med and Scopus databases. StatsDirect 2.8.0 was used for the analysis. RESULTS: 22 and 26 studies were collected respectively for flu and pneumococcal vaccinations. Protection rate of booster dose was 30% (95% CI=6-62%) for H1N1. Pooled prevalence protection rate of H3N2 and B was available for meta-analysis only for first dose, 42.6% (95% CI=23.2 - 63.3 %) and 39.6 % (95% CI=26%-54.1%) for H3N2 and B, respectively. Response rate of booster dose resulted 35% (95% CI=19.7-51.2%) for H1N1, 23% (95% CI=16.6-31.5%) for H3N2, 29% (95% CI=21.3-37%) for B. CONCLUSION: Despite the low rate of response, flu, and pneumococcal vaccines are worthwhile for patients with hematological malignancies. Patients undergoing chemotherapy in particular rituximab, splenectomy, transplant recipient had lower and impaired response. No serious adverse events were reported for both vaccines.

14.
Ig Sanita Pubbl ; 69(4): 387-402, 2013.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24091841

ABSTRACT

A questionnaire study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of a continuing medical education course on influenza vaccination, held in October 2011, in changing physicians', medical students' and other health care workers' attitudes towards receiving vaccination for seasonal influenza. The questionnaire contained questions regarding influenza, influenza vaccination, and attitudes towards vaccination. Results show that course participants were more likely to get vaccinated against seasonal influenza in 2011 (i.e. following the course) with respect to 2010 and that all professional categories, except students, were positively influenced by the course.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Public Health/education , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination , Education, Medical, Continuing , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , Italy , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Students, Medical/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...