Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine ; 15(1): 114-117, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38644920

ABSTRACT

We report the use of computerized tomography (CT)-guided navigation for complex spinal deformity correction (anterior and posterior) in an 8-year-old patient with neurofibromatosis complicated by dystrophic pedicles, dural ectasia, and extensive vertebral scalloping. A retrospective review was conducted of the patient's medical records for the past 3 years, including the patient's office visit notes, operative reports, pre- and 2-year postoperative imaging studies. The patient successfully underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion from L3-S1 using CT-guided navigation to negotiate the challenges posed by dural ectasia and vertebral body scalloping. One week after the anterior procedure, she underwent navigation-guided T10-to-pelvis posterior instrumented fusion. There were no perioperative or postoperative complications at 2 years. In patients with complex deformities of the spine, including dural ectasia, scalloped vertebral bodies, and decreased pedicle integrity, the use of intraoperative CT-guided navigation can benefit surgeons by facilitating the safe placement of interbody spacers and pedicle screws.

2.
Spine Deform ; 12(1): 159-164, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37606796

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: AIS type 1 Curves are sub-classified based on the tilt of L4 as 1AR and 1AL. These curves are different w.r.t their curve behavior, progression and level selection. Presently there is no known anatomic etiology for the different behavior. Facet tropism (FT) is defined as the asymmetry between the facet angle of the left and right facet joints. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between facet tropism in the lumbar segments and occurrence of type 1AR and 1AL curves in AIS patients. METHODS: AIS patients with diagnosis of type 1 AR and 1AL right thoracic AIS curves who underwent posterior instrumented fusion were queried from a single institutions' database. Patients needed to have an MRI of their entire spine to be included. L2-3, L3-4 and L4-5 Facet angles (FA, angle made by the facet line with the mid-sagittal line at respected vertebral level) were calculated. FT was classified as follows: ≤ 5° (minimal), 6- 10° (mild) and ≥ 11° (severe). 1AR and 1AL curves were compared for FA, FT and FT grade at each lumbar segmental levels. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients were included (77 females, mean age-13.85 years, mean BMI- 21.63, 73 1AL and 46 1AR). The mean thoracic Cobb was 52.5 ± 9.8°, thoracic kyphosis was 28.12 ± 12° and lumbar lordosis was 53.48 ± 12.6°. L3-4 FA on the right side was more coronally oriented in 1AR curves compared to 1AL curves (37° vs. 31°, p = 0.04). On comparing FT at each level, 1AR curves had a higher FT at L3-4 (1.5° vs. - 2.3°, p = 0.01) and L4-5 levels (5.8° vs. - 0.28°, p < 0.001) compared to 1AL patients. Similarly, 1AR patients had significantly more patients with severe FT at L3-4 (34.8% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.02) and at L4-5 (17.3% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.01) compared to 1ALcurves. CONCLUSION: L3-4 joints are more coronally oriented in 1AR curves compared to 1AL curves. 1AR patients displayed higher FT at L3-4 and L4-5 compared to 1AL patients. 1AR curves also reveal a higher percentage of severe FT at L3-4 and L4-5 levels. This may influence the curve behavior and progression in these two curve types.


Subject(s)
Scoliosis , Spinal Fusion , Zygapophyseal Joint , Female , Humans , Scoliosis/diagnostic imaging , Scoliosis/surgery , Zygapophyseal Joint/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Radiography , Tropism
3.
Spine Deform ; 11(6): 1419-1426, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37402122

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Utility of pre-operative MRI for patients undergoing scoliosis correction has expanded to include an MRI classification for identifying patients at increased risk of experiencing intra-operative neuromonitoring (IONM) alerts based on the shape of the spinal cord and circumferential presence of CSF at the apex of the thoracic curve. In the present study, the authors explore the utility of this new MRI classification and multiple X-ray radiographic parameters in identifying the AIS sub-population at high risk of IONM alerts. METHODS: AIS patients < 18 years old who underwent posterior spinal fusion between 2018 and 2022 at a single institution. Imaging reviewed to determine main thoracic (MT) and thoraco-lumbar (TL) Cobb angles, major thoracic Apical Vertebral Translation (AVT) and lumbar/thoraco-lumbar AVT (TL AVT), thoracic kyphosis (TK), coronal main thoracic Deformity Angular Ratio (cDAR), sagittal DAR (sDAR), and MRI to determine the spinal cord type (1, 2, or 3). RESULTS: A total of 155 AIS patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2018 and 2022 were included. There was a trend to have an increased incidence of Type 3 spinal cord shape both with increase in the MT Cobb angle and MT AVT. There was also a shift toward more IONM alerts in patients with Type 3 (19.5%) spinal cords, AVT ≥ 5 cm (18.9%), and Cobb angle ≥ 650 (28.2%). CONCLUSION: Higher magnitude of thoracic Cobb angle and AVT are associated with higher likelihood of type 3 spinal cord at the apex in MRI. Patients with Type 3 spinal cord, Cobb angle ≥ 650, AVT > 5 cm, and cDAR > 10 have higher likelihood to have IONM alerts. Patient with a Type 3 spinal cord and a Cobb angle ≥ 650 (50.0%), cDAR > 10 (43.7%), and AVT > 5 cm (35.2%) have the highest risk of having IONM alerts.

4.
Am Surg ; 89(6): 2644-2655, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35818927

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common etiologies of an acute abdomen in the emergency department and first-line standard surgical care for the condition has recently been reconsidered. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of surgical intervention versus non-operative antibiotic therapy in the treatment of acute appendicitis in adult and pediatric patients. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE. The search included all studies until January 15th, 2022. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed for abstracting data and assessing data quality and validity. Data were independently extracted by the authors of the study. Meta-analysis was performed and Cohen's Q test for heterogeneous effects was performed to determine if fixed or random-effects models were appropriate for use. RESULTS: Twelve randomized controlled trials investigating a total of 3703 acute appendicitis patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. In the systematic review, eleven RCTs demonstrated that appendectomy had improved effectiveness compared to non-operative antibiotic management. The meta-analysis demonstrated that patients undergoing appendectomy had significantly higher treatment effectiveness compared with antibiotics-only treatment (98.4% vs. 73.3%, P < .0001). The meta-analysis did demonstrate a significant .54-day reduction in hospital length of stay for the appendectomy group compared to the non-operative antibiotic therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical intervention is associated with increased effectiveness of treatment and reduced in-hospital length of stay among patients with acute appendicitis. Guidelines established by institutions and surgical organizations should indicate appendectomy as the standard and superior treatment option for patients presenting with acute appendicitis.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis , Adult , Humans , Child , Appendicitis/drug therapy , Appendicitis/surgery , Appendectomy/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , Acute Disease
5.
Am Surg ; 89(5): 1355-1364, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35574733

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to conduct a narrative review of available literature to understand the use of palliative care in the trauma and surgical critical care setting. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies investigating the use of palliative care in the trauma and surgical critical care setting. The search included all studies published through January 9th, 2022. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist tools. Outcomes were summarized in tables and synthesized qualitatively. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies were included in this review. Key elements of successful palliative care include communication, shared decision-making, family involvement, pain control, establishing a patient's prognosis, and end-of-life management. Approaches to implementation based upon these key elements include best-case/worst-case scenarios, consultation trigger systems, and integrated institutional palliative care programs. Palliative care may reduce hospital length of stay, improve symptom management, and increase patient satisfaction, but the impact on mortality is unclear. CONCLUSION: The core elements of palliative care have been identified and palliative care has been shown to improve outcomes in trauma and surgical critical care. However, the approaches for implementation still require development. The underutilization of palliative care for trauma patients reveals the need for refining criteria for use of palliative care and improvement in the education of surgical critical care teams to provide primary palliative care services.


Subject(s)
Pain Management , Palliative Care , Humans , Hospitals , Critical Care
6.
Am Surg ; 89(6): 2665-2676, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35976619

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Authorship of surgical literature is important for the career advancement of surgeons, and gender disparities in authorship may hinder the representation and leadership of women within academic surgery. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the gender distribution of first, senior, and overall authorship in peer-reviewed surgical journal studies across all surgical specialties to determine if disparities exist. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies investigating the gender distribution of authorship of surgical literature published before December 10th, 2021. Meta-analysis was performed and Cohen's Q test for heterogenous effects was used to determine whether random or fixed-effects models were appropriate. RESULTS: Fifteen studies investigating gender distribution of authorship met inclusion, which included a total of 136,627 pooled studies. The meta-analysis demonstrated the meta-proportion of first authorship for women to be 20.6% (95% CI: 13.9, 28.2), the meta-proportion of senior authorship for women to be 11.9% (95% CI: 6.6, 18.5), and the meta-proportion of overall authorship for women to be 23% (95% CI: 16.2, 30.7). In addition, the proportion of senior authorship for women was found to be significantly lower than the proportion of overall authorship for women (11.9% versus 23.0%, P = .0106). CONCLUSION: There is a significantly smaller proportion of women who are first, senior, and overall authors in surgical literature compared to their colleagues who are men. Sustainable and effective solutions aimed at improving the representation of women surgeons in surgical research and research leadership are necessary.


Subject(s)
Specialties, Surgical , Surgeons , Male , Humans , Female , Authorship , Bibliometrics , Peer Review
7.
Surgery ; 172(6): 1837-1843, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36328825

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the associations of whole blood and component versus component transfusions with in-hospital mortality, complication rates, intensive care unit length of stay, and packed red blood cells transfusion volumes in adult civilian trauma patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program Participant Use File 2016 to 2019 dataset. Adult civilian trauma patients (aged >18 years) sustaining injuries of at least moderate severity who received whole blood and component or component within 4 hours of arrival and underwent thoracotomy or laparotomy were included. Multivariable regression analysis was used to compare outcomes between whole blood and component and component groups. RESULTS: A total of 37,384 patients met eligibility criteria, of which 218 received whole blood and component and 37,166 received component. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between whole blood and component and component groups for those who underwent thoracotomy (adjusted odds ratio = 0.408, P = .413) or laparotomy (adjusted odds ratio = 1.046, P = .857). Thoracotomy patients who received whole blood and component had no difference in 4-hour or 24-hour pack red blood cell volumes (3336 mL vs 3106 mL, P = .754; 3 658mL vs 3,636mL, P = .982), intensive care unit length of stay (10.68 days vs 8.63 days, P = .542), or complications rates compared to those who received component. Laparotomy patients who received whole blood and component had no difference in 4 hour or 24-hour packed red blood cell volumes (2,758 mL vs 2,721mL, P = .927; 3,538 mL vs 3,385 mL, P = .754), intensive care unit length of stay (11.78 days vs 9.90 days, P = .177), or complications rates compared to those who received component. CONCLUSION: Study findings have indicated that a combined resuscitation with whole blood and component transfusion in adult civilian trauma patients is a viable alternative to component transfusion alone.


Subject(s)
Laparotomy , Wounds and Injuries , Adult , Humans , Thoracotomy , Retrospective Studies , Blood Transfusion , Resuscitation
8.
Am Surg ; : 31348221135776, 2022 Nov 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36423909

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In 2021, over 100 000 people were awaiting solid organ transplantation, yet only 44 634 transplants were performed. The aim of this study is to evaluate trends in donor availability, waitlist additions, and transplants performed in the United States from 2001 to 2021. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis to evaluate trends in donor availability, waitlist additions, and solid organ transplants for the 4 most common organs requiring transplants (kidney, liver, heart, and lung) between 2001 and 2021 according to OPTN data. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2021, the overall number of transplants performed, donors available, and waitlist additions increased by 71%, 61%, and 54%, respectively. The number of kidney transplant waitlist additions significantly increased compared to other organs (P < .001). For each kidney transplant performed, there was a 2.25 increase in waitlist additions throughout the study period (P < .001). For each liver and heart transplant performed, there was a .92 and .80 increase in waitlist additions, respectively (P < .001). Lung transplants increased the most by 138% and there was an increase in waitlist additions for every transplant by 1.0 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: There was an absolute increase in the annual number of transplants, donor recruitment, and patients added to the waitlist between 2001 and 2021. Kidney transplant waitlist additions are increasing at a rate outpacing the rates of donor recruitment and transplantation.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...