ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a quality improvement bundle focusing on prevention is effective in reducing pressure injury (PI) incidence or costs or delaying PI onset. METHODS: A combined retrospective/prospective cohort study was performed at an academic tertiary care ICU on all patients admitted with a length of stay longer than 48 hours and Braden scale score of 18 or less. Following retrospective data collection (preintervention), a multimodal quality improvement bundle focusing on PI prevention through leadership initiatives, visual tools, and staff/patient education was developed, and data were prospectively collected (postintervention). RESULTS: Statistical and cost analyses were performed comparing both cohorts. A total of 930 patients met the study inclusion criteria (preintervention, n = 599; postintervention, n = 331). A significant decrease in PI incidence was observed from preintervention (n = 37 [6%]) to postintervention (n = 7 [2%], P = .005). This led to a predicted yearly cost savings of $826,810. Further, a significant increase in time to PI occurrence was observed from preintervention (mean, 5 days) to postintervention (mean, 9 days; P = .04). Staff were compliant with the bundle implementation 80% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the quality improvement bundle focused on multimodal PI prevention in critically ill patients led to a significant reduction in PI incidence, increased time to PI occurrence, and was cost-effective.
Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Pressure Ulcer , Quality Improvement , Humans , Incidence , Prospective Studies , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Clostridium septicum is an anaerobic, gram-positive bacillus known to cause myonecrosis, also known as gas gangrene, a life-threatening necrotizing soft tissue infection. Though it accounts for just 1 % of all infections attributable to Clostridia spp., C. septicum is a highly virulent and aggressive pathogen. Classic presentations of infection include bacteremia resulting in shock, myonecrosis, and vascular seeding. C. septicum-associated gas gangrene most commonly occurs in the setting of traumatic injury, but has also been reported in patients with colorectal malignancy, immunosuppression, neutropenia, and exceedingly rare in association with breast cancer. We report the case of a 56-year-old female patient with stage IV mixed lobar and ductal breast carcinoma with metastasis to the bone and liver, who presented with spontaneous C. septicum myonecrosis of the right hand. No prior traumatic injury was noted. Following amputation of the right forearm, antibiotic treatment, and multiorgan support, the patient passed following transition to palliative care. We hope to increase awareness of this relatively uncommon, though potentially deadly pathogen, as well as to discuss treatment options in patients infected with C. septicum.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Human milk (HM) is the preferred feeding for human infants but may be inadequate to support the rapid growth of the very-low-birth-weight infant. The creamatocrit (CMCT) has been widely used to guide health care professionals as they analyze HM fortification; however, the CMCT method is based on an equation using assumptions for protein and carbohydrate with fat as the only measured variable. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that a human milk analyzer (HMA) would provide more accurate data for fat and energy content than analysis by CMCT. METHODS: Fifty-one well-mixed samples of previously frozen expressed HM were obtained after thawing. Previously assayed "control" milk samples were thawed and also run with unknowns. All milk samples were prewarmed at 40°C and then analyzed by both CMCT and HMA. CMCT fat results were substituted in the CMCT equation to reach a value for energy (kcal/oz). Fat results from HMA were entered into a computer model to reach a value for energy (kcal/oz). Fat and energy results were compared by paired t test with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. An additional 10 samples were analyzed locally by both methods and then sent to a certified laboratory for quantitative analysis. Results for fat and energy were analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Mean fat content by CMCT (5.8 ± 1.9 g/dL) was significantly higher than by HMA (3.2 ± 1.1 g/dL, P < 0.001). Mean energy by CMCT (21.8 ± 3.4 kcal/oz) was also significantly higher than by HMA (17.1 ± 2.9, P < 0.001). Comparison of biochemical analysis with HMA of the subset of milk samples showed no statistical difference for fat and energy, whereas CMCT was significantly higher than for both fat (P < 0.001) and energy (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The CMCT method appears to overestimate fat and energy content of HM samples when compared with HMA and biochemical methods.
