ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: Frailty tends to be considered as a major risk for adverse outcomes in older persons, but some important aspects remain matter of debate. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this paper is to present expert's positions on the main aspects of the frailty syndrome in the older persons. PARTICIPANTS: Workshop organized by International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics (IAGG), World Health Organization (WHO) and Société Française de Gériatrie et de Gérontologie (SFGG). RESULTS: Frailty is widely recognized as an important risk factor for adverse health outcomes in older persons. This can be of particular value in evaluating non-disabled older persons with chronic diseases but today no operational definition has been established. Nutritional status, mobility, activity, strength, endurance, cognition, and mood have been proposed as markers of frailty. Another approach calculates a multidimensional score ranging from "very fit" to "severely frail", but it is difficult to apply into the medical practice. Frailty appears to be secondary to multiple conditions using multiple pathways leading to a vulnerability to a stressor. Biological (inflammation, loss of hormones), clinical (sarcopenia, osteoporosis etc.), as well as social factors (isolation, financial situation) are involved in the vulnerability process. In clinical practice, detection of frailty is of major interest in oncology because of the high prevalence of cancer in older persons and the bad tolerance of the drug therapies. Presence of frailty should also be taken into account in the definition of the cardiovascular risks in the older population. The experts of the workshop have listed the points reached an agreement and those must to be a priority for improving understanding and use of frailty syndrome in practice. CONCLUSION: Frailty in older adults is a syndrome corresponding to a vulnerability to a stressor. Diagnostic tools have been developed but none can integrate at the same time the large spectrum of factors and the simplicity asked by the clinical practice. An agreement with an international common definition is necessary to develop screening and to reduce the morbidity in older persons.
Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological , Aging/physiology , Frail Elderly , Geriatric Assessment , Geriatrics , Stress, Physiological , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Chronic Disease , Congresses as Topic , Greece , Humans , Neoplasms/etiology , Risk Factors , Societies, Medical , World Health OrganizationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional study registered the prevalence of sedative drug use and withdrawal strategies in geriatric in-patients from 30 centres in nine European countries. METHODS: We conducted a survey among young geriatricians using a standardised questionnaire on sedative drug use for more than three weeks. The study population consisted of 1972 in-patients aged 75 years or older. Acute care (620), intermediate care/rehabilitation (359), long-term care (261), terminal care (47) and nursing home (685) settings were represented. The pre-specified outcomes included the prevalence of sedative drug use; the identification of main prescribers and main reasons for prescribing and, the assessment of withdrawal policy, including psychological counselling and involvement of general practitioners. RESULTS: Prevalence of sedative use was highest in long-term care (72%), followed by nursing homes (70%) and terminal care (59%). Geriatricians started prescribing sedatives after admission on 52% of all occasions. The main reasons for prescribing were continuation of medication taken at home (37%), sleep problems emerging after admission (26%) and post-admission worsening of existing sleep problems (20%). Most prescribers (70%) applied an active withdrawal policy. Short-term withdrawal programmes were mostly applied (57%). Most patients (60%) were psychologically counselled during withdrawal from sedatives. General practitioners were often (60%) involved in withdrawal policy. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of prescription of sedative drugs in geriatric in-patients is high. Appropriate setting specific guidelines are needed to control use of sedatives in geriatric in-patients and to ensure withdrawal from these drugs whenever possible.
