Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Fam Cancer ; 6(1): 81-7, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17160434

ABSTRACT

Evaluation of familial colorectal cancer referral can assist in the planning of future cancer surveillance. The aim of the study is to assess colorectal cancer referral pattern to our regional genetics service. Hospital computer records and/or department referral books were used to identify cases referred to the regional genetic service during a 10-year period (1992-2001 inclusive). All files were reviewed along with associated demographic data, risk assessments, referral details, results from mutation testing and screening recommendations. In terms of result, a total of 1100 family files were reviewed (Familial Adenomatous Polyposis families were in a separate register). The number of referrals showed a 10-fold increase over the 10 years. 171 (15.6%) of families met the Amsterdam criteria II were classified as high-risk, 589 (53.5%) families were classified as moderate-risk and 337 (31.0%) as average or low risk. 22.9% families were referred with inaccurate cancer history. Sixty-one families have been identified with mismatch repair mutations. 56.8% of referred individuals were recommended to have regular colonoscopy ranging from 18 monthly to 5 yearly depending on their risks. In conclusion, there has been a 10-fold increase in individuals with suspected hereditary bowel cancer referred to the North West Regional Genetics Service in the last ten years. Genetic assessment may reduce the number of low-risk individuals and those who were found not to be mutation carriers from having unnecessary colonoscopic screening. Thus genetic risk assessment should precede the initiation of regular endoscopic screening.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/epidemiology , Genetic Testing/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Genes, APC , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Genetic Testing/standards , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Referral and Consultation/standards , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment/economics , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , United Kingdom/epidemiology
2.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 3(4): 599-602, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17670321

ABSTRACT

A best evidence topic in cardiothoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether there is any benefit to the use of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) field flooding techniques in open heart surgery in order to reduce post-operative gaseous emboli. Altogether 103 papers were found using the reported search, of which 3 presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that there is no large clinical study to prove that there is a neurocognitive benefit to the use of CO(2) field flooding. However, experimental evidence shows that the solubility of CO(2) emboli justifies efforts to replace intracavital air with CO(2) in open heart surgery to reduce gaseous emboli but that caution is warranted as use of excessive cardiotomy suction may result in hypercarbia.

3.
Emerg Nurse ; 11(5): 19-21, 2003 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14533295

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess the ability of nurses using the Manchester Triage System (MTS) to identify those patients with chest pain requiring immediate electrocardiogram (ECG) and physician assessment within ten minutes. METHOD: A four-week prospective cohort of all patients attending with chest pain compared detection of risk by nurses using the MTS to that of researchers using best available evidence-based prognostic indicators from history. RESULTS: The study of 167 patients showed that nurses using MTS had a sensitivity of 86.8 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval (CI), 78.4-92.3 per cent) and a specificity of 72.4 per cent (95 per cent CI, 61.4-81.2 per cent) when identifying high risk cardiac chest pain. CONCLUSION: Nurses using the MTS are a sensitive tool for identifying high risk cardiac chest pain but further work is required to assess whether additional training can improve sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Angina Pectoris/diagnosis , Chest Pain/classification , Chest Pain/nursing , Electrocardiography/nursing , Emergency Nursing/methods , Triage/methods , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Diagnosis, Differential , False Negative Reactions , Humans , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...