Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Dairy Sci ; 86(2): 688-95, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12647976

ABSTRACT

Environmental concerns have focused attention on animal agriculture and its contribution to P accumulation in soils and runoff to surface waters. Monitoring P inputs and outputs on farms is a means of calculating the potential P build-up in farm soils. The objective of this study was to determine whole-farm P balance and the relative importance of the farm components (herd, manure storage, cropping systems) that contribute to it in dairies of the western United States. Whole-farm balances were computed for 41 commercial dairies in Utah and Idaho using the Maryland Nutrient Balancer. The average whole-farm P balance in the study was 6.6 tonne/yr with an average herd size of 466 cows. Imported feed made up 85.4% of the total P inputs and exported animal products (milk and meat), and manure and compost made up 53.1 and 45.9%, respectively, of the total P outputs. Farms were divided into those that grew crops and those that did not. Whole-farm balance (kg of P balance per animal) for farms that grew crops had more unaccounted for P (difference between P inputs and output) than farms that grew no crops. They also had more imported fertilizer and less imported feed and exported manure and compost. Multiple regression analysis of the relative effects of herd management, manure storage, and cropping system on whole-farm balance per product found that herd P utilization efficiency was the most important factor in determining whole-farm P balance on farms where crops were grown. Crop uptake of available P was the only other subsystem important for these farms. Increased conversion of feed P to P in product is an important way to decrease whole-farm P balance.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Dairying , Environmental Monitoring , Phosphorus/analysis , Animal Feed/analysis , Animals , Cattle , Female , Fertilizers , Lactation , Manure , Phosphorus/administration & dosage , Phosphorus/metabolism , Population Density , Regression Analysis , Soil/analysis , Water/analysis
2.
J Dairy Sci ; 86(12): 4178-86, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14740860

ABSTRACT

Environmental legislation has made it necessary for livestock producers to be able to quantify and adjust the N balance on their farms. Whole-farm N balance and efficiencies were computed for 41 commercial dairies in Utah and Idaho using the University of Maryland Nutrient Balancer. The average N balance, or unaccounted for N, was 81 tonnes per year for the average herd size of 466 cows with 35.8% of the inputs accounted for in the outputs. The major inputs for farms that grew crops (n = 23, herd size = 284 total cows) were imported feed (57.4% of all inputs) and nitrogen fixation (30% of inputs). The major outputs were animal products (primarily milk and some meat, 80% of outputs). For farms that grew no crops (n = 18, herd size = 700 total cows), 98% of the inputs were from imported feed. Of the outputs, 57% of the N was in animal products and 42.9% in manure and compost. Whole-farm balance per product for those farms that grew crops was most affected by herd N utilization efficiency (kg feed N per kg product N), crop N utilization efficiency, and availability of manure N applied to crops, while manure N storage efficiency was of lesser importance. For farms that grew no crops, whole-farm N balance per product was most affected by herd N utilization efficiency and manure N storage efficiency. Maximizing conversion of feed N to product N was the best way to reduce whole-farm N balance.


Subject(s)
Dairying , Nitrogen/analysis , Agriculture , Animal Feed/analysis , Animals , Cattle , Environmental Pollution , Fertilizers , Idaho , Manure , Meat , Milk/chemistry , Nitrogen/metabolism , Nitrogen Fixation , Utah
3.
Am J Rhinol ; 11(5): 349-54, 1997.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9768316

ABSTRACT

We review our experience treating patients with medically refractory frontal sinusitis that could not be relieved with endoscopic intranasal surgery alone. Fourteen combined external and intranasal endoscopic frontal sinusotomies were performed on a consecutive sample of 11 patients presenting over a 38-month period of study. Postoperative results were classified as cured, improved, unchanged, or worse, based on patient symptoms and physical findings. At a mean postoperative follow-up of 19 months (range 4-36), 100% of these patients had benefited from this technique (7 cured, 4 improved, 0 unchanged, 0 worse). There were no major complications and natural sinus physiology was preserved. We conclude that a combined external and endoscopic intranasal frontal sinusotomy is an effective alternative to frontal sinus obliteration.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy/methods , Frontal Sinusitis/surgery , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Frontal Sinusitis/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nose/surgery , Prognosis , Recurrence , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...