Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Can Med Educ J ; 13(3): 67-69, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35875450

ABSTRACT

Advocacy curricula in Canadian medical schools vary significantly. Expert-led, interactive workshops can effectively teach students how to address social determinants of health and advocate for patients. The Longitudinal Advocacy Training Series (LATS) is a free-of-charge, virtual program providing advocacy training created for Canadian medical students by students. The program was straightforward to implement and had high participation rates with 1140 participants representing 9.7% of enrolled Canadian medical students. As well, the program had high satisfaction reported by 87.6% of participants. The LATS toolkit enables health professional programs to develop similar programs for empowering effective health advocates.


Au Canada, les programmes de formation en matière de promotion et de défense des droits varient considérablement d'une faculté de médecine à l'autre. Les ateliers interactifs dirigés par des experts constituent un outil efficace pour enseigner aux étudiants la façon aborder les déterminants sociaux de la santé afin de défendre les droits des patients. La Longitudinal Advocacy Training Series (LATS) est un programme virtuel gratuit de formation à la défense des droits, créé par des étudiants pour les étudiants. Le programme, facile à mettre en œuvre, a connu un taux de participation élevé, à savoir 1140 participants représentant 9,7 % des étudiants en médecine au Canada. En outre, 87,6 % des participants se sont dits très satisfaits du programme. La trousse à outils LATS permet aux programmes de formation des professions de la santé de mettre sur pied des modules similaires pour donner aux étudiants les moyens de devenir des défenseurs de la santé efficaces.

2.
J Neurotrauma ; 38(15): 2103-2121, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33820470

ABSTRACT

Traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCIs) occur due to different spinal column injury patterns, including burst fracture, dislocation, and flexion-distraction. Pre-clinical studies modeling different SCI mechanisms have shown distinct histological differences between these injuries both acutely (3 h and less) and chronically (8 weeks), but there remains a temporal gap. Different rates of injury progression at specific regions of the spinal cord may provide insight into the pathologies that are initiated by specific SCI mechanisms. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the temporal progression of injury at specific tracts within the white matter, for time-points of 3 h, 24 h, and 7 days, for three distinct SCI mechanisms. In this study, 96 male Sprague Dawley rats underwent one of three SCI mechanisms: contusion, dislocation, or distraction. Animals were sacrificed at one of three times post-injury: 3 h, 24 h, or 7 days. Histological analysis using eriochrome cyanide and immunostaining for MBP, SMI-312, neurofilament-H (NF-H), and ß-III tubulin were used to characterize white matter sparing and axon and myelinated axon counts. The regions analyzed were the gracile fasciculus, cuneate fasciculus, dorsal corticospinal tract, and ventrolateral white matter. Contusion, dislocation, and distraction SCIs demonstrated distinct damage patterns that progressed differently over time. Myelinated axon counts were significantly reduced after dislocation and contusion injuries in most locations and time-points analyzed (compared with sham). This indicates early myelin damage often within 3 h. Myelinated axon counts after distraction dropped early and did not demonstrate any significant progression over the next 7 days. Important differences in white matter degeneration were identified between injury types, with distraction injuries showing the least variability across time-points These findings and the observation that white matter injury occurs early, and in many cases, without much dynamic change, highlight the importance of injury type in SCI research-both clinically and pre-clinically.


Subject(s)
Spinal Cord Injuries/etiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/pathology , White Matter/pathology , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Disease Progression , Male , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Time Factors
3.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater ; 118: 104446, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33780860

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Passive mechanical properties of the paraspinal muscles are important to the biomechanical functioning of the spine. In most computational models, the same biomechanical properties are assumed for each paraspinal muscle group, while cross-sectional area or fatty infiltration in these muscles have been reported to differ between the vertebral levels. Two important properties for musculoskeletal modeling are the slack sarcomere length and the tangent modulus. This study aimed to investigate the effect of vertebral level on these biomechanical properties of paraspinal muscles in a rat model. METHODS: The left paraspinal muscles of 13 Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed under anesthesia. Six muscle biopsies were collected from each rat: three from multifidus (one per each of the L1, L3, and L5 levels) and similarly three from longissimus. Each biopsy was cut into two halves. From one half, two to three single muscle fibers and two to six muscle fiber bundles (14 ± 7 fibers surrounded in their connective tissue) were extracted and mechanically tested in a passive state. From the resulting stress-strain data, tangent modulus was calculated as the slope of the tangent at 30% strain and slack sarcomere length (beyond which passive force starts to develop) was recorded. The other half of each biopsy, which represented the muscle at the fascicle level, was snap frozen, sectioned, stained for Collagen I and its area fraction was measured. To evaluate the effect of spinal level on these biomechanical properties of multifidus and longissimus, one-way repeated measures ANOVA (p < 0.05) was performed for tangent modulus and slack sarcomere length, while for collagen I content linear mixed-models analysis was adopted. RESULTS: In total, 192 fibers and 262 fiber bundles were mechanically tested. For both muscle groups, no significant difference in tangent modulus of the single fibers was detected between the three spinal levels (p = 0.9 for multifidus and p = 0.08 for longissimus). Similarly, the tangent modulus values for the fiber bundles were not significantly different between the three spinal levels (p = 0.13 for multifidus and p = 0.49 for longissimus). In both muscle groups, the slack sarcomere lengths were not different among the spinal levels except for multifidus fibers (p = 0.02). Collagen I area fraction in muscle fascicles averaged 6.8% for multifidus and 5.3% for longissimus and was not different between the spinal levels. DISCUSSION: The results of this study highlighted that the tangent modulus, slack sarcomere length, and collagen I content of the lumbar paraspinal muscles are independent of spinal level. This finding provides the basis for the assumption of similar mechanical properties along a paraspinal muscle group.


Subject(s)
Lumbosacral Region , Paraspinal Muscles , Animals , Lumbar Vertebrae , Muscle Fibers, Skeletal , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Spine
4.
J Neurotrauma ; 37(9): 1140-1148, 2020 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31950856

ABSTRACT

Early decompression of the traumatically injured and persistently compressed spinal cord is intuitively beneficial for neurological outcome. Despite considerable pre-clinical evidence of a neurological benefit to early decompression, the effect of early surgical decompression in clinical spinal cord injury (SCI) remains less clear. The discrepancy between pre-clinical and clinical results may be due to differences between the biomechanical variables used in pre-clinical animal models and the biomechanical conditions occurring in clinical injuries. These pre-clinical variables include region of spinal cord, velocity of impact, and injury mechanism. In this study, the effect of velocity and duration of residual compression on injury severity were evaluated using a novel, rodent model of cervical dislocation SCI. Fifty-two male Sprague-Dawley rats were included in five groups: two timings of decompression (24 min, 240 min), two velocities (10 mm/sec, 500 mm/sec), and a sham group. All injuries involved a 1.45-mm dorsal dislocation of the C6 vertebra relative to C5 with subsequent residual compression of 0.8 mm. Animals were evaluated for motor function using the Martinez open field, grip strength, and grooming tests for 6 weeks post-injury. Immunohistochemistry and histology following sacrifice were conducted with counts for NeuN- and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT)-positive neurons, and length of cavitation. Behavioral testing and histological analysis revealed that injuries induced by the high velocity were consistently more severe than those induced by the low velocity, with behavioral correlations ranging between 0.46 and 0.58 (p < 0.05). Longer duration of residual compression did not produce significantly more severe injuries as measured by functional tests and histology. These findings demonstrate that the velocity of the initial traumatic impact may be a more important factor than duration of residual compression in determining SCI severity in a dislocation model of SCI.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Disease Models, Animal , Joint Dislocations/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Compression/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Animals , Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology , Joint Dislocations/pathology , Male , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Spinal Cord Compression/pathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/pathology , Time Factors
5.
J Neurosci Methods ; 322: 58-70, 2019 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30951755

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preclinical spinal cord injury models do not represent the wide range of biomechanical factors seen in human injuries, such as spinal level, injury mechanism, velocity of spinal cord impact, and residual compression. These factors may be responsible for differences observed between experimental and clinical study results, especially related to the controversial issue of timing of surgical decompression. NEW METHOD: Somatosensory Evoked Potentials were used to: a) characterize residual compression depths in a dislocation model, and b) evaluate the physiological effect of whether or not the spinal cord was decompressed following the initial injury, prior to the application of residual compression. Modifications to vertebral clamps and the development of a novel surgical frame allowed us to conduct surgical and injury procedures in a controlled manner without the risk of additional damage to the spinal cord. Behavioural outcomes were evaluated following varying dislocation displacements, in addition to the survivability of 4 h of residual compression following a traumatic injury. RESULTS: Residual compression immediately following the initial dislocation demonstrated significantly different electrophysiological response compared to when the residual compression was delayed. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: There are currently no other residual compression models that utilize a dislocation injury mechanism. Many residual compression studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of early decompression, however the compression of the spinal cord is often not representative of clinical traumatic injuries. Preclinical studies typically model residual compression using a sustained force through quasi-static application, when human injuries often occur at high velocities, followed by a sustained displacement occlusion of the spinal canal. CONCLUSIONS: This study has validated several novel procedural approaches and injury parameters, and provided critical details to implement in the development of a traumatic cervical dislocation SCI model with residual compression.


Subject(s)
Disease Models, Animal , Spinal Cord Compression/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Animals , Cervical Cord/injuries , Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory , Male , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Sciatic Nerve/physiopathology
6.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 64: 58-68, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29685426

ABSTRACT

The wide variability, or heterogeneity, in human spinal cord injury is due partially to biomechanical factors. This review summarizes our current knowledge surrounding the patterns of human spinal column injury and the biomechanical factors affecting injury. The biomechanics of human spinal injury is studied most frequently with human cadaveric models and the features of the two most common injury patterns, burst fracture and fracture dislocation, are outlined. The biology of spinal cord injury is typically studied with animal models and the effects of the most relevant biomechanical factors - injury mechanism, injury velocity, and residual compression, are described. Tissue damage patterns and behavioural outcomes following dislocation or distraction injury mechanisms differ from the more commonly used contusion mechanism. The velocity of injury affects spinal cord damage, principally in the white matter. Ongoing, or residual compression after the initial impact does affect spinal cord damage, but few models exist that replicate the clinical scenario. Future research should focus on the effects of these biomechanical factors in different preclinical animal models as recent data suggests that treatment outcomes may vary between models.


Subject(s)
Disease Models, Animal , Joint Dislocations/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Spinal Fractures/physiopathology , Spinal Injuries/physiopathology , Animals , Biomechanical Phenomena , Biophysics , Cadaver , Cattle , Compressive Strength , Contusions , Finite Element Analysis , Humans , Spine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...