Development of the Patient's Experience and Attitude Colposcopy Eindhoven Questionnaire (PEACE-q).

BACKGROUND: No validated instruments for the evaluation of patient satisfaction in colposcopy do exist. Therefore, this study reports on the development of a Patient's Experience and Attitude to Colposcopy questionnaire. METHODS: Patients who recently received colposcopy participated in a focus group. A panel of experts evaluated the transcriptions and agreed on a 15-item draft questionnaire. The draft questionnaire was completed by 68 women who subsequently came for a colposcopy. For construct validation, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were performed as well as reliability analysis. Concurrent validity was assessed with the 4-item Patient Health questionnaire (PHQ-4). RESULTS: Construct validation resulted in an 8-item patient perception scale with good psychometric properties (Cronbach's alpha: 0.76) and excellent model fit. Two subscales could be discriminated: patient procedure perception scale (alpha: 0.89) and caregiver attitude perception scale (alpha: 0.71). Both subscales intercorrelated moderately (r = 0.28, p = 0.045). The subscale patient perception correlated significantly with the PHQ-4 scale and its anxiety subscale, not with the depression subscale. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a Patient's Experience and Attitude to Colposcopy questionnaire with adequate psychometric properties. Future application in out-patient clinics should further evaluate its clinical relevance.

Healthcare utilization in patients with first-time implantable cardioverter defibrillators (data from the WEBCARE study).

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the level of healthcare utilization (HCU) and the predictors of high HCU use in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is lacking. We examined the level of HCU and predictors associated with increased HCU in first-time ICD patients, using a prospective study design. METHODS: ICD patients (N = 201) completed a set of questionnaires at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after inclusion. A hierarchical multiple linear regression with three models was performed to examine predictors of HCU. RESULTS: HCU was highest between baseline and 3 months postimplantation and gradually decreased during 12 months follow-up. During the first year postimplantation, only depression (ß = 0.342, P = 0.002) was a significant predictor. Between baseline and 3 months follow-up, younger age (ß = -0.220, P < 0.01), New York Heart Association class III/IV (ß = 0.705, P = 0.01), and secondary indication (ß = 0.148, P = 0.05) were independent predictors for increased HCU. Between 3 and 6 months follow-up, younger age (ß = -0.151, P = 0.05) and depression (ß = 0.370, P < 0.001) predicted increased HCU. Between 6 and 12 months only depression (ß = 0.355, P = 0.001) remained a significant predictor. CONCLUSIONS: Depression was an important predictor of increased HCU in ICD patients in the first year postimplantation, particularly after 3 months postimplantation. Identifying patients who need additional care and provide this on time might better meet patients' needs and lower future HCU.

E-health to manage distress in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: primary results of the WEBCARE trial.

UNLABELLED: The Web-based distress management program for patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD; WEBCARE) was developed to mitigate distress and enhance health-related quality of life in ICD patients. This study investigated the treatment effectiveness at 3-month follow-up for generic and disease-specific outcome measures. METHODS: Consecutive patients implanted with a first-time ICD from six hospitals in the Netherlands were randomized to either the "WEBCARE" or the "usual care" group. Patients in the WEBCARE group received a 12-week fixed, six-lesson behavioral treatment based on the problem-solving principles of cognitive behavioral therapy. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-nine patients (85% response rate) were randomized. The prevalence of anxiety and depression ranged between 11% and 30% and 13% and 21%, respectively. No significant intervention effects were observed for anxiety (ß = 0.35; p = .32), depression (ß = -0.01; p = .98) or health-related quality of life (Mental Component Scale: ß = 0.19; p = .86; Physical Component Scale: ß = 0.58; p = .60) at 3 months, with effect sizes (Cohen d) being small (range, 0.06-0.13). There were also no significant group differences as measured with the disease-specific measures device acceptance (ß = -0.37; p = .82), shock anxiety (ß = 0.21; p = .70), and ICD-related concerns (ß = -0.08; p = .90). No differences between treatment completers and noncompleters were observed on any of the measures. CONCLUSIONS: In this Web-based intervention trial, no significant intervention effects on anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, device acceptance, shock anxiety, or ICD-related concerns were observed. A more patient tailored approach targeting the needs of different subsets of ICD patients may be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00895700.

Disease management for co-morbid depression and anxiety in diabetes mellitus: design of a randomised controlled trial in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety are common co-morbid health problems in patients with type 2 diabetes. Both depression and anxiety are associated with poor glycaemic control and increased risk of poor vascular outcomes and higher mortality rates. Results of previous studies have shown that in clinical practice, treatment of depression and anxiety is far from optimal as these symptoms are frequently overlooked and undertreated. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomised controlled trial will examine the effectiveness of a disease management programme treating symptoms of depression and anxiety in primary care patients with Type 2 diabetes. Patients will be randomized on patient level in 1:1 ratio. Random block sizes of 2 and 4 are used. The disease management programme consists of screening, stepped treatment and monitoring of symptoms (n = 80). This will be compared to care as usual (n = 80). DISCUSSION: The disease management model for co-morbid depression and anxiety in primary care patients with diabetes is expected to result in reduced symptoms of depression and anxiety, improved quality of life, reduced diabetes specific distress and improved glyceamic control, compared to care as usual. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR2626.