Removal and Reoccurrence of LLZTO Surface Contaminants under Glovebox Conditions.

The reactivity of Li6.4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6O12 (LLZTO) solid electrolytes to form lithio-phobic species such as Li2CO3 on their surface when exposed to trace amounts of H2O and CO2 limits the progress of LLZTO-based solid-state batteries. Various treatments, such as annealing LLZTO within a glovebox or acid etching, aim at removing the surface contaminants, but a comprehensive understanding of the evolving LLZTO surface chemistry during and after these treatments is lacking. Here, glovebox-like H2O and CO2 conditions were recreated in a near ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy chamber to analyze the LLZTO surface under realistic conditions. We find that annealing LLZTO at 600 °C in this atmosphere effectively removes the surface contaminants, but a significant level of contamination reappears upon cooling down. In contrast, HCl(aq) acid etching demonstrates superior Li2CO3 removal and stable surface chemistry post treatment. To avoid air exposure during the acid treatment, an anhydrous HCl solution in diethyl ether was used directly within the glovebox. This novel acid etching strategy delivers the lowest lithium/LLZTO interfacial resistance and the highest critical current density.

On the Relative Importance of Li Bulk Diffusivity and Interface Morphology in Determining the Stripped Capacity of Metallic Anodes in Solid-State Batteries.

Lithium metal self-diffusion is too slow to sustain large current densities at the interface with a solid electrolyte, and the resulting formation of voids on stripping is a major limiting factor for the power density of solid-state cells. The enhanced morphological stability of some lithium alloy electrodes has prompted questions on the role of lithium diffusivity in these materials. Here, the lithium diffusivity in Li-Mg alloys is investigated by an isotope tracer method, revealing that the presence of magnesium slows down the diffusion of lithium. For large stripping currents the delithiation process is diffusion-limited, hence a lithium metal electrode yields a larger capacity than a Li-Mg electrode. However, at lower currents we explain the apparent contradiction that more lithium can be extracted from Li-Mg electrodes by showing that the alloy can maintain a more geometrically stable diffusion path to the solid electrolyte surface so that the effective lithium diffusivity is improved.