Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Infect Dis ; 191(9): 1472-7, 2005 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15809906

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is characterized by a risk of nosocomial transmission; however, the risk of airborne transmission of SARS is unknown. During the Toronto outbreaks of SARS, we investigated environmental contamination in SARS units, by employing novel air sampling and conventional surface swabbing. Two polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive air samples were obtained from a room occupied by a patient with SARS, indicating the presence of the virus in the air of the room. In addition, several PCR-positive swab samples were recovered from frequently touched surfaces in rooms occupied by patients with SARS (a bed table and a television remote control) and in a nurses' station used by staff (a medication refrigerator door). These data provide the first experimental confirmation of viral aerosol generation by a patient with SARS, indicating the possibility of airborne droplet transmission, which emphasizes the need for adequate respiratory protection, as well as for strict surface hygiene practices.


Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/transmission , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/isolation & purification , Canada/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/genetics , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/epidemiology
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 8(10): 1044-7, 2002 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12396913

ABSTRACT

On October 12, 2001, two envelopes containing Bacillus anthracis spores passed through a sorting machine in a postal facility in Washington, D.C. When anthrax infection was identified in postal workers 9 days later, the facility was closed. To determine if exposure to airborne B. anthracis spores continued to occur, we performed air sampling around the contaminated sorter. One CFU of B. anthracis was isolated from 990 L of air sampled before the machine was activated. Six CFUs were isolated during machine activation and processing of clean dummy mail. These data indicate that an employee working near this machine might inhale approximately 30 B. anthracis-containing particles during an 8-h work shift. What risk this may have represented to postal workers is not known, but this estimate is approximately 20-fold less than a previous estimate of sub-5 micro m B. anthracis-containing particles routinely inhaled by asymptomatic, unvaccinated workers in a goat-hair mill.


Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Anthrax/transmission , Bacillus anthracis/isolation & purification , Bioterrorism , Equipment Contamination , Occupational Exposure , Postal Service , Aerosols , Anthrax/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial , Filtration/instrumentation , Humans , Risk Factors , Spores, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Workplace
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...