Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Med Microbiol ; 60(Pt 12): 1762-1766, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21816946

ABSTRACT

The serological laboratory workload in detecting toxoplasma infection may be expected to change with changes in the clinical profile of patient populations. We have examined the clinical information and laboratory results for patients referred to the Scottish Toxoplasma Reference Laboratory in April-March 1999-2000 and 2009-2010. Numbers of patient sera submitted for testing were similar (1624 and 1552) but there was a change in the clinical profile, with a significant fall in patients with symptoms of current infection (612 versus 335; P<0.0001) and a significant rise in immunocompromised patients (275 versus 531; P<0.0001). Although the percentage of patient samples with toxoplasma antibody decreased (53.9% versus 37.5%; P<0.0001), the number of positives increased with age, demonstrating the continuing risk of toxoplasma infection. More cases of current infection were identified in 2009-2010 than in 1999-2000 (48 versus 35). This increase was significant both for all females with current infection (P=0.0253) and also for those in the childbearing 20-39 years age group (P=0.0388). Our literature search did not find any published information on toxoplasma workload in the last decade. In summary, we have shown that there have been significant changes in the laboratory diagnosis of toxoplasma infection but it is as important as ever that effective diagnostic strategies are maintained.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Protozoan/blood , Toxoplasma/immunology , Toxoplasmosis/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Female , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Laboratories, Hospital , Male , Middle Aged , Serologic Tests , Toxoplasmosis/immunology
2.
Pain ; 60(1): 49-54, 1995 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7715941

ABSTRACT

A study was carried out in a multidisciplinary pain clinic with the purpose of comparing the effectiveness of outpatient cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) with amitriptyline (AMI) to that of supportive therapy with AMI. The treatments were given weekly over 8 weeks. Global and continuous outcome measures were used. Analysis was by chi-square for global data and MANOVA with baseline scores as covariants for continuous variables. No significant differences could be demonstrated. The scores over a 6-month follow-up period suggested a delayed positive advantage for CBT but this only approached and did not achieve statistical significance. The findings are discussed.


Subject(s)
Amitriptyline/therapeutic use , Behavior Therapy , Pain/drug therapy , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Clinics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
3.
Pain ; 32(1): 127-130, 1988 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2963249
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...