"Suction Tube Uterine Tamponade" for treatment of refractory postpartum hemorrhage: Internal feasibility and acceptability pilot of a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility and acceptability of a novel, low-cost "Suction Tube Uterine Tamponade" (STUT) treatment for refractory postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). METHODS: We allocated patients with refractory PPH by randomly ordered envelopes to STUT or routine uterine balloon tamponade (UBT, Ellavi free-flow system) in 10 hospitals in South Africa. In the STUT group, a 24FG Levin stomach tube was inserted into the uterine cavity and vacuum created with a vacuum pump or manual vacuum aspiration syringe. RESULTS: For this internal pilot study, 12 participants were allocated to STUT and 12 to UBT. Insertion failed in one of each group and was recorded as difficult in 3/10 STUT and 4/9 UBT insertions respectively (five missing data). There were two laparotomies and one intensive care unit admission in the UBT group. Pain during STUT insertion was graded as none/mild in 9/10 and severe in 1/10. The experience of the STUT procedure was graded as fine in 4/11 and "uncomfortable but acceptable" in 7/11. CONCLUSION: STUT is feasible and acceptable, justifying continuation of our trial. These data will also inform a large World Health Organization trial to test effectiveness of uterine tamponade methods. The numbers are too small to support any clinical recommendation.

Difficult etonogestrel implant removals in South Africa: A review of 74 referred cases.

OBJECTIVES: To assess etonogestrel contraceptive implant location and outcomes among women referred for "difficult" removal to a specialist clinic in South Africa. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective review of cases referred to our clinic for removal of nonpalpable, deep, migrated, or damaged implants, or failed removals from March to August 2017. RESULTS: Most (n = 68, 92%) of the 74 referrals were nonpalpable in our clinic. We used ultrasound for localization and successfully removed 72 implants (97%) in the outpatient clinic. CONCLUSION: With proper protocols and equipment, localization and removal of nonpalpable implants can be safely and effectively achieved in an outpatient African setting. IMPLICATIONS: Access to providers specially trained in ultrasound localization should be available in all settings where implants are offered. Providing timely access to safe and effective implant removals in routine and difficult cases is essential to ensuring that implant programs are in alignment with rights-based, client-centered family planning principles.