Safety and efficacy of incobotulinum toxin type A (NT 201-Xeomin) for the treatment of post-stroke lower limb spasticity: a prospective open-label study.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, NT 201, a new botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) free of complexing proteins, has been used for treating several movement disorders, showing safety and efficacy in upper limb spasticity. AIM: To assess the safety and evaluate the effects of BTX-A NT 201 free from complexing proteins for the treatment of post-stroke lower limb spasticity evaluating spasticity grade, passive ankle dorsi-flexion motion, and muscle's spasms, as well as its efficacy and rate of satisfaction for patients and for the physicians. DESIGN: Prospective open-label study. POPULATION: Patients (71) with post-stroke lower limb spasticity at least 5 months by the event. METHODS: Intramuscular injections of BTX-A NT 201 in soleus, medial, and lateral gastrocnemius with a maximum total dose of 180 U. Each patients was assessed at baseline, 30, and 90 days after treatment using Modified Ashworth Scale, Spasm Frequency Scale, evaluating passive ankle dorsi-flexion motion, and the rate of satisfaction for patients and investigators. RESULTS: Patients treated with BTX-A NT 201 reported a statistically significant reduction in muscle tone and spasms daily increasing passive ankle dorsi-flexion at 30 days, persisting also at 90 days of follow-up. CONCLUSION: BTX-A NT 201 for the treatment of post-stroke lower limb spasticity was safe and efficacious reducing muscle tone and spasms, and improving passive ankle dorsi-flexion movement. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: These results confirmed the safety and effectiveness of a new type of BTX-A, with low immunogenity, useful to improve rehabilitative treatment of post-stroke lower limb spasticity.

Multiple arm lipomatosis and posterior interosseus nerve palsy.

BACKGROUND: Lipomas are common benign soft tissue tumours which tend to be indolent and risk free. Lipomas rarely spread in the deep soft tissue causing posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) neuropathy. METHODS (CASE DESCRIPTION): We present two patients with multiple lipomatosis of the arms and PIN paralysis, with a brief review of the cases reported in literature. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We emphasize the role of electromyographic study as unique methodical capable to reveal an early radial nerve damage, permitting an optimal post-surgical nerve function recovering.

Changes in coordination of postural control during dynamic stance in chronic low back pain patients.

The human postural system operates on the basis of integrated information from three independent sources: vestibular, visual and somatosensory. It is conceivable that a derangement of any of these systems will influence the overall output of the postural system. The peripheral proprioceptive system or the central processing of proprioceptive information may be altered in chronic low back pain (CLBP). We therefore investigated whether patients with CLBP exhibited an altered postural control during quiet standing. Dynamic posturography was performed by 12 CLBP patients and 12 age-matched controls. Subject's task was to stand quietly on a computer-controlled movable platform under six sensory conditions that altered the available visual and proprioceptive information. While the control of balance was comparable between the two groups across stabilized support surface conditions (1-3), CLBP patients oscillated much more than controls in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction in platform sway-referenced conditions (4-6). Control experiments ruled out that increased sway was due to pain interference. In CLBP patients, postural stability under challenging conditions is maintained by an increased sway in AP direction. This change in postural strategy may underlie a dysfunction of the peripheral proprioceptive system or the central integration of proprioceptive information.

Interactions between nociceptive and non-nociceptive afferent projections to cerebral cortex in humans.

We investigated the effect of a tonic discharge of muscle nociceptive afferents on somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in humans in response to stimulation of non-nociceptive afferents arising from the same muscle. Conditioning nociceptive muscle stimulation was achieved by local injection of 50 mg levo-ascorbic acid (in a volume of 0.3 ml) in the body of the extensor digitorum brevis muscle (EDB). The test stimulus for SEPs was an electrical pulse applied to the EDB nerve at an intensity below the motor threshold. The main finding was that tonic muscle nociceptive stimulation strongly depressed the middle-latency P60-N75 complex without modifying the size of the early P40-N50 complex of SEPs. Depression of the P60-N75 complex was correlated with the pain-induced loss of proprioception of the foot, making it plausible that this cortical complex reflects neuronal processes leading to perception.

Spinal reflex pattern to foot nociceptive stimulation in standing humans.

Ipsi- and contralateral patterns of lower limb nociceptive reflex responses were studied in 6 normal subjects in free standing position. Once the position was stabilized, only ankle extensor muscles showed consistent tonic activity while ankle flexors and knee extensors and flexors were virtually silent. Reflex responses, elicited by painful electrical stimuli to the skin of the plantar and dorsal aspect of the foot, were recorded from ipsi- and contralateral quadriceps (Q), biceps femoris (Bic), tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (Sol) muscles. Plantar foot stimulation evoked a large excitatory response in the ipsilateral TA at about 80 ms and a smaller responses in Bic and Q at 70 ms and 110 ms, respectively. Ipsilateral excitatory effects after dorsal foot stimulation consisted of a Bic response at about 75 ms. In addition to excitatory effects, both plantar and dorsal foot stimulation evoked long-lasting suppression of ipsilateral Sol background activity starting at about 60 ms. Contralaterally, the only nociceptive effects after plantar or dorsal foot stimulation were a small excitatory response of Sol at about 85 ms. Evidence is provided that only excitatory responses were contingent upon nociceptive volley. The main mechanical effects seen after plantar stimulation were dorsiflexion of the foot without loss of heel contact with the floor; no withdrawal response of the foot followed nociceptive dorsal stimulation. Our main conclusion is that only reflex nociceptive responses serving to avoid the stimulus without conflicting with limb support function are expressed. The mechanisms reconciling nociceptive action and postural function of the lower limbs are discussed.