Prevention and reversal of superantigen-induced anergy by contact allergen exposure.

The superantigen Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) and the contact allergen 2,4-dinitrofluorbenzene (DNFB) both react with V beta 8+ T-cells delivering distinct signals. Pre-treatment with DNFB painted onto the same skin site where SEB was to be injected, prevented the induction of anergy in V beta + T-cells that was otherwise induced after SEB had been injected intradermally over a period of 2 weeks. Application of the irritant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) instead of DNFB did not exert this effect. Application of DNFB at a site distant from the site where SEB was injected resulted in a much weaker inhibitory influence on the induction of anergy by SEB. Established anergy of V beta 8+ T-cells (proliferative non-responsiveness to SEB in vitro that could be overcome by addition of exogenous interleukin 2 (IL-2)) could be largely reversed by repeated cutaneous exposure to DNFB painted to the site where SEB had been injected before. The moderate decrease of V beta 8+ T-cells normally induced by SEB-treatment was also partially prevented by DNFB pre-treatment. The data indicate the importance of the sequence of signals delivered to T cells and the plasticity of the responsiveness of this cell type.

Modulation of contact sensitivity responses by bacterial superantigen.

Superantigens are potent modulators of the immune system, especially T cells. Therefore, we determined the influence of superantigens on the T-cell-mediated immune response, contact sensitivity. We chose the combination of staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) as superantigen and 2,4-dinitrofluorbenzene (DNFB) as the contact sensitizer, because in BALB/c mice SEB reacts almost exclusively with V beta 8+ T cells, and these cells are capable of transferring contact sensitivity to DNFB from sensitized donors to naive syngeneic recipients. Pretreatment with a single intradermal injection of 50 ng SEB 24 h before DNFB exposure at the same site on the lower abdomen enhanced the induction of contact sensitivity: its intradermal injection permitted sensitization with non-sensitizing concentrations of DNFB as assessed by ear swelling responses after challenge with DNFB. In contrast, pretreatment with repeated intradermal injections of 50 ng SEB every other day over at least 1 week inhibited the induction of contact sensitivity following sensitization. The enhancing effect of SEB may be explained by the creation of a proinflammatory milieu in the skin after a single intradermal injection of the bacterial toxin, whereas the inhibitory effect may be due to tolerization of V beta 8+ T cells. The data indicate that products of skin-colonizing bacteria that can serve as superantigens are able to augment or inhibit the development of contact sensitivity.