Impact of hyperuricaemia on patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with secukinumab in the FUTURE 2-5 and MAXIMISE studies.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are at a significantly increased risk of hyperuricaemia and development of gout, and those with hyperuricaemia have been found to respond poorly to PsA treatment and have more peripheral and destructive joint damage. We present a comprehensive post hoc analysis using pooled data from the FUTURE 2-5 studies and the MAXIMISE study to further evaluate the impact of hyperuricaemia on clinical presentation/disease severity and response to secukinumab in patients with PsA. METHODS: Patients were stratified into two groups based on baseline serum uric acid (SUA) level (threshold of 360 µmol/L). A sensitivity analysis was also performed based on SUA thresholds of 300 µmol/L and 420 µmol/L. Demographics, clinical, radiological characteristics and comorbidities data were collected. RESULTS: At baseline, patients with hyperuricaemia were mostly male, reported a higher prevalence of hypertension, with more clinical dactylitis, more psoriasis and more severe skin disease compared with patients with normouricaemia. A similar proportion of patients in the normouricaemic and hyperuricaemic cohorts achieved American College of Rheumatology responses, resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis, inhibition of structural damage progression and improvement in health-related quality of life across all secukinumab doses at week 52. CONCLUSION: Patients with PsA and hyperuricaemia have different clinical characteristics from patients with PsA and normouricaemia. Identification of these patients at an early stage may facilitate a personalised treatment approach and improved management of comorbidities. Furthermore, secukinumab provided a rapid and sustained response across all manifestations of PsA up to week 52, irrespective of baseline uricaemia status.

Refining Incidence and Characteristics of Inflammatory Myopathies: A Quadruple-Source Capture-Recapture Survey Using the 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria.

OBJECTIVE: Inflammatory myopathies (IM), characterized by muscle inflammation and weakness, are rare systemic diseases. Our previous study estimated an IM incidence rate of 7.98 cases per million people per year (95% confidence interval 7.38-8.66) and highlighted important variations that were likely because of methodologic issues rather than true epidemiologic differences. In this study, we aimed to refine the incidence of IM, using the 2017 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for IM and a quadruple-source capture-recapture method during a 6-year period in Alsace, France, a region with a population of 2 million having benefits of good access to health care and accredited IM referral centers. METHODS: Clinical data of potential IM patients were obtained from 4 sources (general practitioners and community specialists, public and private hospital records, public and private laboratories, and archives from the pathology department). Patients residing in Alsace and who fulfilled the 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria for IM between January 1, 2006, and January 1, 2013, were included. We corrected potentially incomplete ascertainment of cases with capture-recapture analyses. We studied both spatial and temporal distributions of incidence of IM. We also assessed systemic manifestations of the disease. RESULTS: Our review of 1,742 potential cases identified 106 patients with IM. No spatial or temporal heterogeneity was observed. Use of log-linear models showed an estimated 14.9 additional missed cases. Thus, the incidence rate of IM was 8.22 new cases per million inhabitants per year (95% confidence interval 6.76-9.69). Extramuscular manifestations other than dermatomyositis rash were frequently recorded. CONCLUSION: The stringent methodology used in our study provides an accurate estimation of the incidence of IM. This study also demonstrates, in a population-based cohort, the systemic nature of IM.

[Which taxonomy for inflammatory diseases in rheumatology? The concept of Psout]. / Quelle taxonomie des maladies inflammatoires en rhumatologie ? - Le concept de psoutte.

Clinical practice needs the identification of the patient disease. The physician has to rationalize symptoms allowing the recognition of a realistic entity and its classification in a reference nosology. Unlike other practices, the biomedical model uses scientific census methodology, from a tabular perspective to the definition of diseases. Due to its simplification process, it therefore neglects transitional or complex cases. In Rheumatology, this reasoning is challenged by the lack of objectivity and specificity of the items supporting the clinician when he builds the diagnosis, but also by the physiopathological complexity. Sometimes, diseases may be confused or superposed, possibly leading to the description of novel entities. The authors describe herein the difficulties encountered in practical clinical medicine. They show, from a concrete and real personal situation, how it can possibly lead to the justification of a new entity.

TITLE: Quelle taxonomie des maladies inflammatoires en rhumatologie ? - Le concept de psoutte. ABSTRACT: La pratique clinique de la médecine nécessite la reconnaissance de la maladie dont souffre le patient par le médecin. Pour cela, celui-ci rationnalise les signes permettant d'isoler une entité réaliste et de la classer dans la nosologie de référence. Contrairement à d'autres pratiques, le modèle biomédical utilise la méthodologie scientifique du recensement, dans une logique de classification pour définir les maladies. Du fait de son processus de simplification, ce modèle néglige les cas de transition ou les cas complexes. En rhumatologie, ce raisonnement classifiant est mis à l'épreuve par le manque d'objectivité et de spécificité des éléments sur lesquels s'appuie le clinicien pour construire le diagnostic, mais aussi par la complexité des mécanismes physiopathologiques des maladies rhumatismales. Ces maladies peuvent en effet se confondre ou s'intriquer, pour aboutir alors à la description de nouvelles entités non envisagées dans les classifications. Nous présentons dans cette revue les difficultés rencontrées au cours de l'exercice de la médecine dans ces contextes, et comment, à partir d'un cas concret, vécu, celles-ci peuvent donner naissance à la proposition d'un nouveau taxon1.

At the crossroads of gout and psoriatic arthritis: "psout".

Psoriatic arthritis and gout are frequently encountered conditions sharing a number of common risk factors, which render their independent study difficult. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated a strong link between these diseases, suggesting the presence of underlying, intertwined pathophysiological mechanisms that currently remain unknown. Indeed, sodium urate crystals could play a pathogenic role in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. In daily practice, the distinction between psoriatic arthritis associated with hyperuricemia and a gouty arthropathy with psoriasis is complex. Several common pathogenic features suggest a more intricate relationship than their mere coexistence in the same patient. Thus, the concurrence of these two diseases should be seen as a novel overlap syndrome, at the boundary between inflammatory and metabolic rheumatism. The present update aims to clarify the determinants of the link and to define this new nosological entity. Its recognition could have therapeutic implications that appear essential for treatment optimization in a personalized setting.Key Points• What is already known about this subject? Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and gout have strong interconnections, including comorbidities and pathophysiology. One must note that confounding clinical symptoms and radiological signs of PsA and gout are similar and difficult to differentiate in patients whose radiological lesions become too advanced to be differentiated or with less clearly defined phenotypes.• What does this study add? The pathogenic role of chronic hyperuricemia in the development and maintenance of PsA is based on epidemiological, clinical, and fundamental arguments and hence does not appear fortuitous. These two pathological processes can influence each other.• How might this impact on clinical practice? This new line of thinking regarding the convergence of gout and PsA, involving the role of urate crystals, could prompt a potential new approach to treatment (urate-lowering therapy) among patients with active/refractory PsA.

Anti-Ku syndrome with elevated CK and anti-Ku syndrome with anti-dsDNA are two distinct entities with different outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To refine the spectrum of anti-Ku-associated disease, a condition that is equivocally described by current diagnostic criteria for connective tissue diseases. METHODS: Among 42 consecutive patients harbouring anti-Ku antibodies, subgroups with similar phenotypes and prognosis were delineated without an a priori diagnosis using hierarchical clustering analysis of the cumulative clinico-biological features recorded during the follow-up. Features present at baseline that most efficiently predicted the outcomes were then identified using a sensitivity-specificity sum maximisation approach. RESULTS: Clinico-biological features were clustered into three groups. Glomerulonephritis and ILD, the two fatal complications in this cohort, were unequally distributed between the three clusters that additionally differed on six clinico-biological features.Among features present at baseline, elevated serum level of creatine kinase (CK) and anti-dsDNA antibodies were generally mutually exclusive and most efficiently predicted the cluster belonging at last follow-up. Anti-Ku patients with elevated CK had a 22-fold higher risk of ILD while anti-Ku patients with anti-dsDNA antibodies had a 13-fold higher risk of glomerulonephritis CONCLUSION: "Anti-Ku with elevated CK" syndrome and "anti-Ku with anti-dsDNA" syndrome represent two distinct entities that are important to recognise in order to best tailor patient care.

Gemcitabine-induced myopathy.

BACKGROUND: There have been few studies on muscle injury caused by cytotoxic agents used in cancer. In particular, only four cases of muscle manifestations have been reported in patients who received gemcitabine as single chemotherapy without adjuvant radiotherapy. In only one of these observations gemcitabine was considered to be the causative agent. METHODS: We report the case of a patient without comorbidity treated with gemcitabine monotherapy for 2 months for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, who developed a proximal motor deficiency of the lower limbs and myolysis (creatinine kinase 1858 IU/L) associated with an erythema of both thighs. RESULTS: Muscle MRI revealed the presence of edema on both the quadriceps muscles. A muscle biopsy showed post-necrotic regeneration and significant vascular proliferation. Only three small inflammatory infiltrates were observed, while expression of the major histocompatibility complex class I in muscle fibers was normal. There was no recurrence of cancer, anti-TIF-1γ antibodies tested negative, and discontinuation of gemcitabine, without further treatment, resulted in complete disappearance of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The present observation suggests that gemcitabine monotherapy without adjuvant radiotherapy can cause myopathy through vascular lesions, a mechanism which also underlies the more common side effects of this treatment. These findings have obvious therapeutic implications.