ABSTRACT
BACKROUND: In the S3 treatment guidelines psychotherapy is recommended in all psychological disorders. Therefore, outpatient or inpatient psychotherapy should be recommended by therapists in most cases. On the other hand, it is well known that waiting periods for psychotherapeutic treatment are considerable, which raises the question how the recommendation for psychotherapy is presented in psychiatric hospitals in Germany. OBJECTIVES: The article deals with the question of how frequent the recommendation of psychotherapeutic treatment is made after psychiatric inpatient stay or day care, and if there are differences between hospitals and patient groups. METHOD: In four psychiatric hospitals in southern Germany the frequency of recommendation for psychotherapy in psychiatric patients was registered and compared to the number of all patients treated in the equivalent time. For this purpose, we analyzed data of the basic documentation in the four participating hospitals. RESULTS: Overall, 9.6 % of the patients received a recommendation of psychotherapeutic treatment. In the psychiatric university hospital a subsequent psychotherapeutic treatment was recommended somewhat more often. Differences between hospitals were present but marginal. Over all participating hospitals, psychotherapy was recommended markedly less frequently in patients with an F2 diagnosis in comparison with patients with F3 or F4 diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Psychotherapeutic treatment after psychiatric inpatient stay is recommended cautiously. Probably therapists anticipate the fact that the growing demand for psychotherapeutic treatment in general reduces the chances for persons after psychiatric inpatient treatment.
Subject(s)
Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Psychotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Psychotherapy/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Evidence-Based Medicine , Germany/epidemiology , Guideline Adherence/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Psychiatric/standards , Humans , Inpatients/psychology , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/psychology , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Psychotherapy/methods , Referral and Consultation/standards , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Waiting periods for inpatient or outpatient psychotherapeutic treatment are generally considerable. For patients treated in a psychiatric day-clinic or hospital, implementation of a recommended subsequent psychotherapeutic treatment might be difficult. OBJECTIVES: In part II of the psychotherapy after hospital or day clinic (PAKT) study, we examined how the recommendation for psychotherapy can be implemented after psychiatric treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three months after discharge from one of four psychiatric hospitals in southern Germany, we interviewed 306 patients who received a recommendation for psychotherapeutic treatment after their hospital stays if the recommendation was implemented successfully. RESULTS: Only about 12 % of the patients in the follow-up group were unable to implement the general recommendation for psychotherapy after psychiatric stay despite motivation for psychotherapeutic treatment. In the case of recommendation for outpatient psychotherapy, 20 % were unsuccessful. Predictors for successful implementation were education and employment, whereas variables like age, gender, diagnosis, or severity of disorder did not play a significant role. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively small percentage of unimplemented psychotherapeutic treatment is surprising at a first glance. However, the proportion recommended for psychotherapy after psychiatric stay was less than 10 %, as shown in the first part of the study (see PAKT Study Part I, doi:s00115-016-0107-z).
Subject(s)
Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Psychotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Psychotherapy/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Evidence-Based Medicine , Germany/epidemiology , Guideline Adherence/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Psychiatric/standards , Humans , Inpatients/psychology , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/psychology , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Psychotherapy/methods , Referral and Consultation/standards , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
AIMS: Attempts to reduce high utilisation of mental health inpatient care by targeting the critical time of hospital discharge are rare. In this study, we test the effect of a needs-oriented discharge planning intervention on number and duration of psychiatric inpatient treatment episodes (primary), as well as on outpatient service use, needs, psychopathology, depression and quality of life (secondary). METHODS: Four hundred and ninety-one adults with a defined high utilisation of mental health care gave informed consent to participate in a multicentre RCT carried out at five psychiatric hospitals in Germany (Düsseldorf, Greifswald, Regensburg, Ravensburg and Günzburg). Subjects allocated to the intervention group were offered a manualised needs-led discharge planning and monitoring intervention with two intertwined sessions administered at hospital discharge and 3 months thereafter. Outcomes were assessed at four measurement points during a period of 18 months following discharge. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analyses showed no effect of the intervention on primary or secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Process evaluation pending, the intervention cannot be recommended for implementation in routine care. Other approaches, e.g. team-based community care, might be more beneficial for people with persistent and severe mental illness.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/standards , Community Mental Health Services/standards , Mental Disorders/therapy , Outpatients , Patient Discharge , Adult , Ambulatory Care/psychology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Middle Aged , Outpatients/psychology , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge/standards , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness IndexSubject(s)
Community Psychiatry/organization & administration , Cooperative Behavior , Mental Disorders/rehabilitation , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Germany , Humans , Insurance, Psychiatric , Interdisciplinary Communication , Patient Care Planning , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administrationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As a result of changes to the legal and economic framework over the past years, medical documentation has changed substantially. METHODS: Based on a literature search of important medicolegal studies and appeal decisions, an overview is given of legal principles and their practical consequences, especially for the fields of psychiatry and psychotherapy. RESULTS: Documentation is a contractual and crime-related duty arising from the professional code for doctors and the legal obligation to provide documentation. In addition to being a memory aide for the doctor, its purposes are to safeguard and justify the treatment and to provide legal evidence. The documentation should be provided in a format that is sufficiently clear for specialist staff, using keywords, possibly handwritten, and use contemporary terminology. All important diagnostic and therapeutic measures must be documented. This is particularly important when the treatment deviates from standard treatment and in medical procedures aiming to protect the patient. CONCLUSIONS: The legal requirements for documentation are becoming more stringent. The time spent on such activities has so far not been reimbursed by the financing bodies.
Subject(s)
Documentation/standards , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/standards , Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Psychiatry/standards , Psychotherapy/legislation & jurisprudence , Psychotherapy/standards , Germany , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Research on the situation of caregivers of patients with bipolar affective disorders has been mostly neglected in German-speaking countries. METHODS: In the sense of a bottom-up approach, a content analysis of problem-oriented interviews with 32 caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder was carried out. Additionally, the relevant literature identified by means of a computerized MEDLINE research on the years 1997 - 2007 with the key words "caregiver"/"relative", "burden" and "bipolar disorder", was analysed to describe the situation of the caregivers comprehensively. Related articles in the MEDLINE search were also viewed. RESULTS: The burden of relatives of bipolar patients are manifold and partially specific. On the top of the list caregivers mentioned emotional burdens like: "lack of understanding, helplessness and hopelessness" (90,6 %) and "own concernment" (81,2 %). Specific burdens of these caregivers are "repulsing and uncooperative behaviour of the patient" (78,1 %) and "burdens due to the alternation between manic and depressive symptoms" (71,9 %). The manic and depressive symptomatic complex were assessed as burden with equal frequency (75,0 %). CONCLUSIONS: An effective support should consider the necessity of helping the caregivers in handling the symptoms of the illness and imparting coping strategies for emotional relief of caregivers.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Caregivers/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Female , Humans , Inpatients , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating ScalesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Against the background of the problematic interface between outpatient and inpatient care in the German psychiatric health care system, the role of psychiatrists in private practice concerning the pathways of psychiatric inpatients before and after their hospital stay should be evaluated. METHODS: Based on data of the psychiatric basic documentation (DGPPN-BADO) of 4905 patients admitted to the psychiatric hospital in 2003, predictors of the type of referral as well as the outpatient aftercare were analysed by means of logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: 9.8 % of patients were referred by psychiatrists in private practice. Patients sent by psychiatrists more seldom had an addiction disorder, more often were residents of sheltered homes, showed a present episode lasting more than three months and had a psychopharmacological pre-treatment with an atypical antipsychotic or SSRI. At discharge, outpatient aftercare by psychiatrists in private practice was recommended to 32.1 % of inpatients. Referral by a psychiatrist in private practice as well as the diagnosis of schizophrenia or affective disorder led more often to an outpatient aftercare by a psychiatrist. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the small number of patients referred by psychiatrists, the cooperation between psychiatric hospital and psychiatrists in private practice has to be focused by the quality management of the hospital.
Subject(s)
Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Psychiatry , Adult , Age Factors , Aggression/psychology , Female , Germany , Humans , Inpatients , Logistic Models , Male , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Prognosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Referral and Consultation , Socioeconomic Factors , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The study aimed at investigating out-patient treatment of patients with depressive disorders referred to a psychiatric hospital by general practitioners (GP) and psychiatrists in private practice (PP). Data of the German psychiatric basic documentation system (DGPPN-BADO) of all depressive inpatients admitted to a psychiatric hospital in 2003 were analysed (n = 360). GP-patients had significantly less often a psychopharmalogical treatment before admission than PP-patients (59.4% vs. 89.7%). GP give significantly less often antidepressive drugs than PP do (53.1% vs. 87.9%). 4,7% of GP-patients and 17.9% of PP-patients received supportive psychotherapy, special psychotherapeutic treatment regimes were seldom in use during outpatient care (4,7% vs. 5,4%).
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/therapy , Antidepressive Agents/administration & dosage , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Chi-Square Distribution , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Family Practice , Germany , Hospitalization , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Humans , Outpatients , Primary Health Care , Psychiatry , Psychotherapy , Recurrence , Referral and Consultation , Tranquilizing Agents/administration & dosage , Tranquilizing Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
According to a WHO study depressive disorders are the worldwide leading cause for life years lived with disability. Beside the direct costs of care, enormous indirect costs are caused by disablement and permanent incapacity to work. Furthermore, depressive disorders are often accompanied by suicidal behaviour, and they increase the mortality rate due to cardiovascular disorders. Despite their outstanding importance, there is a huge need to optimize diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in primary care, because depression is often masked by somatic symptoms. To achieve a correct diagnosis, the medical practitioner must actively explore the core criteria of depressed mood, diminished interest and pleasure, as well as fatigue and loss of energy. Improvement of early recognition and treatment of depressive patients is thus the main objective of modern awareness programs such as the "German Alliance against Depression", which was established in the framework of the German Research Network on Depression and Suicidality.
Subject(s)
Depression , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/psychology , Cost of Illness , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/economics , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/therapy , Diagnosis, Differential , Germany/epidemiology , Global Health , Humans , Suicide/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the current research regarding the situation of mentally ill persons. METHODS: The relevant literature was identified by means of a computerized MEDLINE search on the years 1996 - 2004 with the key words "sibling" and "mentally ill"/"chronically ill"/"psychiatric disorder" (631 articles). Also the related articles in the MEDLINE search were viewed. Finally 170 articles of journals and books were included in the review. RESULTS: The situation of siblings of psychiatric ill has manifold aspects, which can be classified into the following categories: Burdens due to the relationship to the ill sibling, burdens because of the relations to the shared parents and other family members, and burdens in the daily life of the siblings due to the illness of his/her sibling. On the other side there are rewards and positive developments in their life because of the illness of the sibling. Personal variables like sex, family size and age at onset of the illness are an influence on the experience of the sibling. CONCLUSION: The revealed burdens of the affected siblings require necessary answers by political representatives, professionals in and outside a clinic, and the involved families.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/psychology , Siblings/psychology , Adolescent , Age of Onset , Child , Cost of Illness , Family Characteristics , Family Relations , Humans , Parents/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The study was aimed at evaluating facets of psychiatric inpatient care of patients with schizophrenia in a German and a Japanese hospital. METHODS: Based upon a sample of 865 inpatients of the Psychiatric State Hospital Regensburg (BKR) and 50 inpatients of the Tokyo Women's Medical University (TWMU) admitted in 1997, data of a psychiatric basic documentation system (BADO) were analysed with regard to essential process and outcome indicators. RESULTS: Despite dissimilarities between both patient groups with respect to schizophrenic subtype, duration of illness as well as severity of illness and psychosocial functioning, the differences regarding therapeutic treatment and outcome were marked. In 1997, the rate of atypical neuroleptics was 18% at the BKR and 12% at the TWMU. Inpatients of the TWMU were given benzodiazepines and anticholinergic drugs significantly more frequently. Male patients of the TWMU showed more severe side-effects. Psychotherapy and sociotherapy were less frequently applied at the TWMU. Although the patient groups did not differ with regard to suicidal behaviour and overt aggressions during hospitalisation, we found a higher rate of mechanical restraints at the TWMU. In 1997, the average length of stay was significantly higher at the TWMU (153 days) than at the BKR (52 days), but inpatients of the TWMU improved only slightly better with regard to global psychosocial functioning (GAF) and severity of illness (CGI). CONCLUSIONS: The revealed differences in treatment are likely due to differences in service provision and national practices in Germany and Japan and provide clues for quality improvements. The BADO is a useful tool for continuous quality management and an ongoing international exchange concerning psychiatric inpatient care.
Subject(s)
Cross-Cultural Comparison , Cultural Diversity , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Hospitals, State , Schizophrenia/therapy , Schizophrenic Psychology , Adult , Aggression/psychology , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Benzodiazepines/administration & dosage , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Cholinergic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Cholinergic Antagonists/adverse effects , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Female , Germany , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, State/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Restraint, Physical/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Sex Factors , Suicide/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In the light of the increasing importance of the general practitioner as a gatekeeper within the German psychiatric health care system, his/her role needs to be evaluated. METHOD: On the basis of the psychiatric documentation (DGPPN-BADO) of 4066 patients predictors for referral to inpatient psychiatric care by the general practitioner together with outpatient aftercare were analysed by means of logistic regression models. RESULTS: 18.4% of the patients were referred by a general practitioner, mostly those with an affective disorder (Odds Ratio 4.0) or schizophrenia (OR 3.3), and residents of old people's or nursing homes (OR 3.5). In 49.9% of the patients, aftercare by a general practitioner was recommended - more frequently patients with addictive disease (OR 2.0), pensioners (OR = 1.7) and elderly patients (OR 1.03), more rarely patients with schizophrenia (OR 0.4) or affective disorders (OR 0.7). CONCLUSION: In view of the relatively low referral rate, in-hospital quality management should focus on improving cooperation between psychiatric hospital and GP.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Physician's Role , Physicians, Family/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Data Collection/statistics & numerical data , Female , Germany , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Middle Aged , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , RiskABSTRACT
Based on data of the psychiatric basic documentation of 4066 patients, predictors of type of referral as well as outpatient aftercare were analyzed by means of logistic regression analyses. Of the patients, 25.7% were admitted without any referral, 18.4% were referred by a general practitioner, and 9.8% by a psychiatrist in private practice. Patients referred by a general practitioner suffered more frequently from an affective disorder or schizophrenia and were residents of senior citizen homes. Inpatients sent by a psychiatrist were more often residents of sheltered homes, showed a present episode lasting more than 3 months, and had undergone psychopharmacological pretreatment with an atypical antipsychotic or SSRI. Outpatient aftercare was recommended to 83.1% of inpatients: 49.4% by a general practitioner and 32.1% by a psychiatrist in private practice. Outpatient aftercare by a general practitioner was more frequent in the elderly and patients with addiction disorders. Referral by a psychiatrist in private practice as well as schizophrenia or an affective disorder led more often to outpatient aftercare by a psychiatrist. The small number of patients referred by general practitioners and psychiatrists in private practice has to become the focus of quality management.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Based upon a content analysis of interviews(n=32), a questionnaire evaluating expectations and satisfaction with psychiatric inpatient care was developed and sent to all caregivers whose ill family members gave their agreement to the survey (n=1 39). The response rate was 41.7% (n=58). Successful treatment of the patient by competent physicians and psychologists, understandable and sincere explanations to caregivers regarding the patient's disease, support of the patient's self-confidence and gains in confidence, psychotherapy for the patient, and by no means psychopharmacological treatment were assessed as most important by caregivers. From their point of view, gaps between expectations and satisfaction with inpatient care exist, especially regard-ing the following aspects: patient psychotherapy, information to caregivers about therapies, medication, side effects and treatment progress, understandable and sincere explanation to care-givers, support in dealing with the patients, and information about the possibilities of rehabilitation after inpatient care.
Subject(s)
Consumer Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Family , Health Care Surveys/methods , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Patient Care Management/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Attitude to Health , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Psychotherapeutic Processes , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methodsABSTRACT
Against the background of a beginning shortage of psychiatrists, results from interviews with 112 employees of an automotive company with the topic "Great Job" are presented to discuss their relevance to psychiatry. The interviews were analysed by means of a qualitative content analysis. Most employees assigned importance to great pay, constructive collaboration with colleagues, and work appealing to personal interests. Further statements particularly relevant to psychiatry were: successful career, flexible working hours, manageable job, work-life balance, well-founded training, no bureaucracy within the company, and personal status in society. The well-known economic restrictions in health care and the still negative attitude towards psychiatry currently reduce the attraction of psychiatry as a profession. From the viewpoint of personnel management, the attractors of a great job revealed in this study are proposed as important clues for the recruitment of medical students for psychiatry and the development of psychiatric staff.
Subject(s)
Attitude , Employment/psychology , Job Satisfaction , Psychiatry/methods , Quality of Life/psychology , Social Class , Staff Development/methods , Career Choice , Data Collection , Germany , Humans , Industry/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatry/education , Staff Development/statistics & numerical data , WorkforceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This article aimed to provide an overview regarding the burden of relatives of mentally ill patients and their expectations towards psychiatric institutions. METHODS: The literature was selected from Medline covering the years 1996 - 2002. 342 articles were reviewed, 145 of which were described in this review. RESULTS: The burden of relatives are manifold and can be classified into the following categories: time spent on caring, financial difficulties, occupational restrictions, detrimental effects on relatives own physical and psychological well-being, reduction in leisure activities, negative effects on social relationships, experiences of discrimination and refusal, deficiencies in information about illness, feelings of not being taken seriously, insufficient service support, long distance to mental health service, emotional burdens of caregivers and difficulties with the patients behaviour. The expectations of the relatives mainly refer to the categories "relationship between staff and relatives", "information about illness" and "establishing of institutions required". CONCLUSION: The various burdens of relatives and their expectations towards psychiatric services point to necessary improvements of mental health services in the sense of a consumer-oriented psychiatric care.
Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Family/psychology , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Mental Disorders/psychology , Caregivers/psychology , Emotions , Employment , Family Relations , Health , Humans , Mental Disorders/economicsABSTRACT
This study was aimed to evaluate the role of psychotherapy in psychiatric in-patient care at the example of the Bezirksklinikum Regensburg (BKR) (Community Clinic in Regensburg, Germany). Based on a sample of 6,719 patients suffering from F2-F6 ICD-10 diagnoses, the data of the psychiatric basic documentation (BADO) from January 1995 until April 1999 was retrospectively analysed regarding type and frequency of psychotherapy, influencing factors on indication, and effects of psychotherapy on treatment success. In 33% of cases, specific psychotherapy was in use. A client-centered therapy was carried out in 20% of patients. Other techniques of psychotherapy such as behaviour therapy, cognitive therapy, IPT for schizophrenics, or psychodynamic psychotherapy were applied to 2-6% of patients. Inpatients with eating disorders, personality disorders, neurotic disorders, somatization disorders, and depression were more likely to receive a specific psychotherapy. A significantly positive effect on treatment success was only documented in affective disorders, whereas a significantly negative influence was found in personality disorders.
Subject(s)
Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Psychotherapy/standards , Adult , Female , Germany , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/psychology , Middle Aged , Quality Control , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: On account of the different therapeutic options in mood disorders, differences between unipolar and bipolar disorders are described by reviewing the literature and evaluating data of a psychiatric basic documentation system (DGPPN-BADO). METHODS: Based upon a sample of 18 846 psychiatric in-patients of the Bezirksklinikum Regensburg between 1989 and 1999, data of 2644 patients with unipolar depression (UD) and bipolar affective disorders (BAS) were analysed and compared with findings from previous studies. RESULTS: 77,8 % suffer from unipolar depression, 22,2 % from bipolar affective disorders. Patients with BAS fall ill 10 years earlier than patients with UD, they have a 50 percent higher number of hospital stays and longer cumulative length of stay, and they are significantly more ill at admission. In both patient groups we found a mean duration of hospital stay of about 45 days and a clinical improvement of nearly 25 points in GAF. Patients with BAS attempt suicide more often and have comorbid alcoholism more frequently. At discharge they show greater deficits in their psychosocial capability (measured with GAF) than patients with UD do. CONCLUSION: Patients with BAS, which had to be hospitalised, have a more severe course of illness, but they can be treated equally as effective and efficient as patients with UD.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Mood Disorders/psychology , Adult , Age of Onset , Aged , Alcoholism/complications , Bipolar Disorder/complications , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Mood Disorders/complications , Mood Disorders/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to examine suicidal behaviour before and during in-patient care in a psychiatric state hospital. METHOD: Based upon a psychiatric basic documentation system prevalence and risk factors of in-patient suicides, suicide attempts and suicidal thoughts were investigated over an 11-year period from 1989 until 1999. RESULTS: A total of 30 in-patient suicides were found among 21 062 patients. According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis the risk of hospital suicide increases for patients with schizophrenia, higher cumulative length of stay, previous suicide attempt, part-time employment and training/retraining. Predictors of suicide attempt during hospitalization are suicide attempt on admission, personality disorder, suicidal thoughts on admission, schizophrenia and affective disorder. CONCLUSION: As Schizophrenics represent the high-risk group of in-patient suicide, suicide prevention should be a major goal in their treatment. More frequent suicide risk assessment is recommended particularly before granting a leave or an outing.