Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 128(6): 1035-40, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18024330

ABSTRACT

Timely communication of significant or unexpected findings in surgical pathology can significantly improve patient care. Although surgical pathology critical values have been published, no systematic assessment in pediatric surgical pathology has been published. We surveyed pediatric pathologists and pediatric subspecialists to develop pediatric surgical pathology critical values for verbal reporting before the final pathology report. A policy and process for reporting and documentation was implemented, with retrospective and prospective quality review. Critical values cases constituted 9.4% of surgical pathology accessions. Retrospective analysis revealed that 80% (73/91) had been reported and documented before policy implementation. Following implementation, 97.3% (402/413) were verbally reported and documented. A multidisciplinary group provided valuable information about critical values that might not have been obvious to pediatric pathologists but are important for patient care. Although the term critical values has become embedded in the surgical pathology literature, we would propose an alternative term for significant or unexpected findings that require timely communication and documentation.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Pediatric , Pathology, Clinical/standards , Pathology, Surgical/standards , Pediatrics , Adolescent , Child , Clinical Laboratory Information Systems , Hospital Communication Systems , Humans , Infant , Interdisciplinary Communication , Reference Standards
2.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 129(12): 1619-25, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16329734

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Intraoperative consultations, including frozen sections (FSs), are essential for patient care and are a key quality component in anatomic pathology. Little data exists about the use, frequency, and type of discrepancies and deferral rates of FS diagnoses in pediatric and adolescent surgical pathology. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze indications, discrepancies, and deferrals for all FSs performed at a children's hospital during a 10-year period. DESIGN: All FSs for 1995-2004 were reviewed for indications, discrepancies, deferred diagnoses, and turnaround time. Discrepancies were categorized into major and minor subtypes according to potential impact on patient care. RESULTS: A total of 35,611 surgical pathology cases were accessioned, with 2839 intraoperative consultations, which included 2783 FSs and 56 nonmicroscopic consultations. Most frequent indications included questions related to neoplasms (tumor detection, specimen adequacy, triage, classification, and margins) and suspected Hirschsprung disease. In these consultations, 115 discrepancies (4%) were identified, of which 7 (0.2%) were major, with potentially significant clinical impact, and 108 (3.9%) were minor. The major discrepancies included tumor, ganglion cell, or organism detection. The minor discrepancies involved sampling error, reclassification of benign or malignant neoplasms without clinical consequences, tumor typing or grading, and ganglion cell identification without clinical impact. Deferrals in 718 FSs (25% deferral rate) included tumor classification from generic to specific, identification of organisms, and evaluation of lymph node biopsies for lymphoma. Turnaround time exceeded 20 minutes in 403 cases (14%). CONCLUSIONS: The FS rate of 7.8% overall and 5% of surgical pathology cases is similar in children's and general hospitals. The major discrepancy (discordance) rate is lower, which may reflect the different indications for FS in children and adolescents. Evaluation of colonic biopsies for ganglion cells is a diagnostic pitfall. The deferral rate of 25% reflects the definition of a deferred diagnosis. Traditional definitions of deferred and discordant FS diagnoses should be refined to reflect the increasing use of adjunct techniques, especially in tumor classification. These findings emphasize that, in children and adolescents, most FSs are performed for tumor classification, triage, detection, and specimen adequacy, and for possible Hirschsprung disease. In children and adolescents, FSs are used infrequently to identify normal or unknown tissue, to analyze a lesion in a radiographically directed specimen, or to detect lymph node metastases. The differences in pediatric and adolescent FS indications and use underscore the importance of focused education in pediatric surgical pathology.


Subject(s)
Frozen Sections/methods , Hospitals, Pediatric , Pathology, Surgical/methods , Pediatrics , Hirschsprung Disease/diagnosis , Hirschsprung Disease/surgery , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Neoplasms/classification , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/surgery , Referral and Consultation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...