Drug-induced angioedema: experience of Italian emergency departments.

Acute angioedema represents a cause of admission to the emergency department requiring rapid diagnosis and appropriate management to prevent airway obstruction. Several drugs, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and oral antidiabetics, have been reported to induce angioedema. The aim of this prospective observational study conducted in a setting of routine emergency care was to evaluate the incidence and extent of drug-induced non-histaminergic angioedema in this specific clinical setting, and to identify the class of drugs possibly associated with angioedema. Patients admitted to seven different emergency departments (EDs) in Rome with the diagnosis of angioedema and urticaria were enrolled during a 6-month period. Of the 120,000 patients admitted at the EDs, 447 (0.37 %) were coded as having angioedema and 655 (0.5 %) as having urticaria. After accurate clinical review, 62 cases were defined as drug-induced, non-histaminergic angioedema. NSAIDs were the most frequent drugs (taken by 22 out of 62 patients) associated with the angioedema attack. Of the remaining patients, 15 received antibiotic treatment and 10 antihypertensive treatment. In addition, we observed in our series some cases of angioedema associated with drugs (such as antiasthmatics, antidiarrheal and antiepileptics) of which there are few descriptions in the literature. The present data, which add much needed information to the existing limited literature on drug-induced angioedema in the clinical emergency department setting, will provide more appropriate diagnosis and management of this potentially life-threatening adverse event.

Virological diagnosis of respiratory virus infection in patients attending an emergency department during the influenza season.

To investigate the burden of influenza-like illness (ILI), patients attending an emergency department during the influenza season were tested for several common respiratory viruses, using PCR-based methods. Influenza A viruses were detected in 25 of 103 recruited patients (24%), rhinoviruses in 15%, and respiratory syncytial virus in only one. The data suggest that triage criteria based on ILI case definitions would not contain the spread of the influenza virus during pandemic alerts and could lead to unnecessary isolation of patients with other infections. Application of broader triage criteria followed by timely molecular diagnosis could be effective in preventing new respiratory agent transmission.