ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the intermediate perioperative outcomes, rate of complications and functional data after XPS 180-W Greenlight photoselective laser vaporization (PVP) compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a prospective non-randomized single centre study. METHODS: We analyzed a prospectively-maintained database collecting data on 100 patients undergoing surgical treatment of BPH (50 consecutive PVP and 50 consecutive TURP). All complications, recorded and graduated according to the Clavien Dindo system and the clinical, operative, perioperative variables were compared. The functional outcomes, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), max flow rate (Qmax) and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), were recorded preoperatively and at 1 year of follow up. RESULTS: Age, prostate volume, use of anticoagulants or antiplatelets, ASA score and operative time were comparable in the two groups. The reduction in the hemoglobin levels (0.46 vs 1.8 g/dL), the catheterization time (1.2 vs 3.2 days), the hospital stay (1.7 vs 3.8 days) and rate of transfused patients (0 vs 8%), were significantly lower for PVP. Transient re-catherization (6 vs 26%) was significantly lower for PVP. The IPSS and Qmax at 1 year showed no significant difference. The rate of repeat TURP/PVP was higher in the TURP group (0 vs 10%). Reduction of PSA, that reflects the major reduction of prostate volume, was statistically greater in PVP group respect TURP group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PVP has advantages in terms of perioperative safety and major complications than TURP. Functional outcomes at 1 year of follow-up were comparable.
Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Laser Therapy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Transurethral Resection of Prostate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) >7 cm, addressing the issue of modality and risk factors for complications and open conversion, and to assess the oncologic outcome. METHODS: The data of 222 patients undergoing LRN for RCC >7 cm prospectively enrolled from 2002 to 2010 at 5 urologic centers were reviewed. Transperitoneal LRN was performed by 5 experienced laparoscopic surgeons. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to assess complications. Multivariable analysis of factors predictive of conversions was performed. Oncologic outcomes for survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median tumor size was 8.5 cm, operative time was 180 minutes, and blood loss was 280 mL. Forty-two patients (19%) received a blood transfusion. Six (2.7%) patients had grade III-IV complications: 2 with postoperative bleeding requiring abdominal re-exploration and 1 each with adrenal injury, splenic injury, wound diastasis, and respiratory insufficiency. Twelve patients (5.4%) were converted to open surgery. The diameter was 11.9 in converted groups and 8.5 cm in nonconverted groups (P = .001). Multivariable analysis revealed that pathologic stage was the only independent predictor of conversion (P = .002). The 5-year overall (OS), cancer-specific (CSS), and progression-free (PFS) survival was 74%, 78%, and 66%, respectively. The 5-year stage-adjusted CSS was 89% in pT2 and 40% in pT3 patients (P <.0001). Limitations of this study were its retrospective nature and the relatively short follow-up period for oncologic outcome. CONCLUSION: LRN for large RCC is a safe operation. Stage pT3 is a risk factor for open conversion and is associated to significantly lower cancer-specific survival compared with pT2 stage.
