Remote assessment of dental records by using intraoral scan-based digital three-dimensional models in an elderly patient population - an exploratory study.

AIM: To assess the agreement rates of dental records derived from intraoral scan-based digital three-dimensional models (3DM) and 3DM + panoramic radiographs (3DM+PAN-X) compared to clinical findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the 3DM/3DM+PAN-X of 50 patients undergoing supportive periodontal therapy (SPT), ten remote raters (inexperienced in using IOS or 3DM) assessed for each site of the dental scheme (32 sites) whether a tooth was missing (M), filled (F), restoration- and caries-free (H), replaced by an implant (I) or decayed (D). Remote records were compared to the clinical reference record of each patient at tooth-level. The clinical records were assessed by an experienced dentist who supplemented the clinical findings with information from available radiographs and the patient records to define the clinical reference record. RESULTS: The agreement-rates for 3DM/3DM+PAN-X at tooth-level are: M: 93%/94%, F: 84%/88%, H: 92%/92%, I: 65%/96%, D: 29%/29%. The overall agreement-rate is 88% for the 3DM-based dental records (14093 of 16000 entries true) and 91% for 3DM+PAN-X (14499 of 16000 entries true). Using 3DM for dental record assessment, posterior teeth had higher odds of correct findings compared to anterior teeth (upper jaw OR=2.34, lower jaw OR=1.27). CONCLUSIONS: The remote detection of healthy, missing and filled teeth and implants by raters inexperienced in using IOS or 3DM shows a high agreement-rate with the clinical findings. The additional evaluation of PAN-X increased the agreement-rate significantly for implants. Thus, the remote assessment of dental records using 3DM+PAN-X has a high accuracy when applied in SPT-patients with low caries activity.

Remote assessment of DMFT and number of implants with intraoral digital photography in an elderly patient population - a comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: This comparative study aimed to evaluate intraoral digital photography (IODP) as assessment-tool for DMFT and number of implants (IMPL) compared to clinical diagnosis (CLIN) in an elderly population with high restorative status. Secondary research questions were whether an additional evaluation of panoramic radiographs (PAN-X) or raters' clinical experience influence the agreement. METHODS: Fifty patients (70.98±7.60 years) were enrolled for standardized CLIN and IODP. The clinical reference examiner and ten blinded raters evaluated the photographs without and with a PAN-X regarding DMFT and IMPL. CLIN were used as reference standard and differences to IODP and IODP-PAN-X findings were analysed descriptively. To assess intra-rater agreement, pairwise Gwet's AC1s of the three diagnostic methods CLIN, IODP and IODP+PAN-X were calculated. RESULTS: Compared to a DMFT of 22.10±3.75 (CLIN), blinded raters evaluated a DMFT of 21.54±3.40 (IODP) and 22.12±3.45 (IODP+PAN-X). Mean values for "Decayed" were 0.18±0.52 (CLIN), 0.45±0.46 (IODP) and 0.48±0.47 (IODP-PAN-X), while 11.02±5.97 (CLIN), 10.66±5.78 (IODP) and 10.93±5.91 (IODP+PAN-X) were determined for "Missing" and 10.90±5.61 (CLIN), 10.43±4.85 (IODP) and 10.71±5.11 (IODP+PAN-X) for "Filled". IMPL were 0.78±2.04 (CLIN), 0.58±1.43 (IODP), 0.78±2.04 (IODP+PAN-X). Gwet's AC1 using the mode of the blinded raters' assessment of "Decayed", "Missing" and IMPL compared to CLIN ranged from 0.81 to 0.89 (IODP) and 0.87 to 1.00 (IODP+PAN-X), while for "Filled" and DMFT they were 0.29 and 0.36 (IODP) as well as 0.33 and 0.36 (IODP+PAN-X), respectively. Clinical experience did not influence the agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of "Decayed", "Missing" and IMPL by IODP showed almost perfect agreement, whereas of "Filled" and DMFT revealed fair to moderate agreement with clinical findings. Additional PAN-X-evaluation increased agreement compared to IODP-diagnostics alone. IODP for the assessment of DMFT and IMPL might be a suitable method in large-scale epidemiological studies, considering high agreement in total values and miscellaneous agreement at patient-level.

The impact of splinting timepoint of mobile mandibular incisors on the outcome of periodontal treatment-preliminary observations from a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcome of periodontal parameters in mobile mandibular incisors which were splinted before or after full-mouth disinfection (FMD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four periodontitis patients with ≥ 1 mobile mandibular incisor (mobility degree II/III, clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥ 5 mm, relative bone loss ≥ 50%) were randomly allocated to group A or B. Patients received periodontal treatment (PT) including splinting of teeth 33-43 before (A) or after FMD (B). Patient (age/sex/smoking status/systemic diseases/number of teeth) and tooth-related parameters (mean probing pocket depth (PPD)/CAL/oral hygiene indices; for the overall dentition and region 33-43) were assessed prior to PT and 12 months after FMD by a blinded examiner. Therapy-related information was added (group/antibiotic therapy/surgical intervention). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (A: 12; B:14) were re-examined. Two patients of group B did not need splinting after FMD because of reduction in mobility after FMD. Regression analysis revealed a positive association of antibiotic therapy with CAL_overall, PPD_overall, and PPD_33-43 (p ≤ 0.01). There is a trend toward a higher reduction of periodontal parameters at teeth 33-43 in group A (PPD_33-43: - 0.91 vs. - 0.27 mm; CAL_33-43: - 1.02 vs. - 0.47 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Teeth splinted before or after FMD show a significant improvement in periodontal parameters 12 months after FMD. Splinting after FMD offered the option to detect reduction in mobility. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Despite a higher, but not statistically significant, improvement in periodontal parameters on teeth splinted before FMD, the results do not indicate which timepoint of splinting is more beneficial. The decision for the therapeutic procedure should therefore be made individually.

Oral anticoagulants--a frequent challenge for the emergency management of acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: The emergency management of patients with acute ischemic stroke (IS) using oral anticoagulants (OAC) represents a great challenge. Effective anticoagulation predisposes to bleeding and represents a contraindication for systemic thrombolysis. However, patients on OAC can receive intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator if the international normalized ratio (INR) does not exceed 1.7, but data regarding the risk of hemorrhagic complications are highly controversial. Neurointerventional recanalization of intracranial artery occlusion represents an alternative option in OAC patients with acute IS. The proportion of OAC users among consecutive patients who suffer from acute IS or transient ichemic attacks (TIA) is unknown. METHODS: A prospective observational study, consecutively enrolling all patients with IS or TIA admitted to our neurological emergency room (ER), was performed between August 2009 and February 2011. Basic demographic variables, present use of OAC, severity of stroke, cardiovascular risk factors, INR values and the symptom onset to presentation time were recorded. In IS patients on OAC presenting within 4.5 h after symptom onset, management was analyzed. In thrombolysed IS patients, bleeding events were documented. Outcome was assessed after 3 months. RESULTS: During the study period, 12,237 patients were admitted to our neurological ER. IS or TIA were diagnosed in 2,074 (16.9%). Complete data were available for 1,914 of these subjects (92.3%); 53.8% were male (median age: 72 years). 69.7% suffered IS, 30.3% TIA. OAC were being used by 8.7% of all patients. OAC patients were older than non-OAC patients (78 vs. 72 years, p < 0.001). Subtherapeutic INR values (<2.0) were found in 67.3% of OAC patients with IS. 54.8% of all OAC IS patients presented at the ER within ≤4.5 h after the event (57/104). An INR ≤1.7 - compatible with systemic thrombolysis - was present in 33/57 patients (57.9%). Recanalization therapy was performed in 21/57 patients (36.8%). No difference in symptomatic or fatal intracerebral bleedings between thrombolysed patients with and without prior OAC use was observed (p = 0.720 and 0.135, respectively). Multivariable analysis of predictors of the 3-month outcome in IS patients revealed that prior medication with OAC was neither associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome after 3 months in the whole population of stroke patients (p = 0.235) nor in patients in whom recanalization approaches were used (n = 306; p = 0.271). CONCLUSIONS: Oral anticoagulation represents a frequent challenge for the emergency manangement of IS. A considerable proportion of anticoagulated IS patients appears to be eligible for thrombolysis. Establishing standardized treatment procedures in these patients is warranted.