Physiologic Effects of ECMO in Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

RATIONALE: Blood flow rate affects mixed venous oxygenation (SvO2) during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), with possible effects on the pulmonary circulation and the right heart function. OBJECTIVES: We aimed at describing the physiologic effects of different levels of SvO2 obtained by changing ECMO blood flow, in patients with severe ARDS receiving ECMO and controlled mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Low (SvO2 target 70-75%), intermediate (SvO2 target 75-80%) and high (SvO2 target > 80%) ECMO blood flows were applied for 30 minutes in random order in 20 patients. Mechanical ventilation settings were left unchanged. The hemodynamic and pulmonary effects were assessed with pulmonary artery catheter and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cardiac output decreased from low to intermediate and to high blood flow/SvO2 (9.2 [6.2-10.9] vs 8.3 [5.9-9.8] vs 7.9 [6.5-9.1] L/min, p = 0.014), as well as mean pulmonary artery pressure (34 ± 6 vs 31 ± 6 vs 30 ± 5 mmHg, p < 0.001), and right ventricle stroke work index (14.2 ± 4.4 vs 12.2 ± 3.6 vs 11.4 ± 3.2 g*m/beat/m2, p = 0.002). Cardiac output was inversely correlated with mixed venous and arterial PO2 values (R2 = 0.257, p = 0.031 and R2 = 0.324, p = 0.05). Pulmonary artery pressure was correlated with decreasing mixed venous PO2 (R2 = 0.29, p <0.001) and with increasing cardiac output (R2 = 0.378 p < 0.007). Measures of ventilation/perfusion mismatch did not differ between the three steps. CONCLUSIONS: In severe ARDS patients, increased ECMO blood flow rate resulting in higher SvO2 decreases pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac output, and right heart workload. This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Pathophysiological profile of non-ventilated lung injury in healthy female pigs undergoing mechanical ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Lung regions excluded from mechanical insufflation are traditionally assumed to be spared from ventilation-associated lung injury. However, preliminary data showed activation of potential mechanisms of injury within these non-ventilated regions (e.g., hypoperfusion, inflammation). METHODS: In the present study, we hypothesized that non-ventilated lung injury (NVLI) may develop within 24 h of unilateral mechanical ventilation in previously healthy pigs, and we performed extended pathophysiological measures to profile NVLI. We included two experimental groups undergoing exclusion of the left lung from the ventilation with two different tidal volumes (15 vs 7.5 ml/kg) and a control group on bilateral ventilation. Pathophysiological alteration including lung collapse, changes in lung perfusion, lung stress and inflammation were measured. Lung injury was quantified by histological score. RESULTS: Histological injury score of the non-ventilated lung is significantly higher than normally expanded lung from control animals. The histological score showed lower intermediate values (but still higher than controls) when the tidal volume distending the ventilated lung was reduced by 50%. Main pathophysiological alterations associated with NVLI were: extensive lung collapse; very low pulmonary perfusion; high inspiratory airways pressure; and higher concentrations of acute-phase inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-1ß and TNF-α and of Angiopoietin-2 (a marker of endothelial activation) in the broncho-alveolar lavage. Only the last two alterations were mitigated by reducing tidal volume, potentially explaining partial protection. CONCLUSIONS: Non-ventilated lung injury develops within 24 h of controlled mechanical ventilation due to multiple pathophysiological alterations, which are only partially prevented by low tidal volume.

Respiratory failure that occurs in cases of atelectasis, pneumonia and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure a machine called a mechanical ventilator is used to move air in and out of the patient's lungs. We know that the use of a mechanical ventilator can induce lung injury, but complete exclusion from ventilation might not be safe. Using pig lungs to mimic the patient's lungs, we evaluated the use of a ventilator against non-use. We find that the lungs sustained injury regardless of ventilator use. The non-ventilated lung injury consisted of collapse (lack of expansion), low amount of blood flow, high ventilation pressure and inflammatory response. Physicians should be aware that also the regions of the lung not receiving ventilation are at risk of injury.

Electrical Impedance Tomography to Monitor Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure.

Hypoxemic respiratory failure is one of the leading causes of mortality in intensive care. Frequent assessment of individual physiological characteristics and delivery of personalized mechanical ventilation (MV) settings is a constant challenge for clinicians caring for these patients. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a radiation-free bedside monitoring device that is able to assess regional lung ventilation and changes in aeration. With real-time tomographic functional images of the lungs obtained through a thoracic belt, clinicians can visualize and estimate the distribution of ventilation at different ventilation settings or following procedures such as prone positioning. Several studies have evaluated the performance of EIT to monitor the effects of different MV settings in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, allowing more personalized MV. For instance, EIT could help clinicians find the positive end-expiratory pressure that represents a compromise between recruitment and overdistension and assess the effect of prone positioning on ventilation distribution. The clinical impact of the personalization of MV remains to be explored. Despite inherent limitations such as limited spatial resolution, EIT also offers a unique noninvasive bedside assessment of regional ventilation changes in the ICU. This technology offers the possibility of a continuous, operator-free diagnosis and real-time detection of common problems during MV. This review provides an overview of the functioning of EIT, its main indices, and its performance in monitoring patients with acute respiratory failure. Future perspectives for use in intensive care are also addressed.

Understanding cardiopulmonary interactions through esophageal pressure monitoring.

Esophageal pressure is the closest estimate of pleural pressure. Changes in esophageal pressure reflect changes in intrathoracic pressure and affect transpulmonary pressure, both of which have multiple effects on right and left ventricular performance. During passive breathing, increasing esophageal pressure is associated with lower venous return and higher right ventricular afterload and lower left ventricular afterload and oxygen consumption. In spontaneously breathing patients, negative pleural pressure swings increase venous return, while right heart afterload increases as in passive conditions; for the left ventricle, end-diastolic pressure is increased potentially favoring lung edema. Esophageal pressure monitoring represents a simple bedside method to estimate changes in pleural pressure and can advance our understanding of the cardiovascular performance of critically ill patients undergoing passive or assisted ventilation and guide physiologically personalized treatments.

The oesophageal balloon for respiratory monitoring in ventilated patients: updated clinical review and practical aspects.

There is a well-recognised importance for personalising mechanical ventilation settings to protect the lungs and the diaphragm for each individual patient. Measurement of oesophageal pressure (P oes) as an estimate of pleural pressure allows assessment of partitioned respiratory mechanics and quantification of lung stress, which helps our understanding of the patient's respiratory physiology and could guide individualisation of ventilator settings. Oesophageal manometry also allows breathing effort quantification, which could contribute to improving settings during assisted ventilation and mechanical ventilation weaning. In parallel with technological improvements, P oes monitoring is now available for daily clinical practice. This review provides a fundamental understanding of the relevant physiological concepts that can be assessed using P oes measurements, both during spontaneous breathing and mechanical ventilation. We also present a practical approach for implementing oesophageal manometry at the bedside. While more clinical data are awaited to confirm the benefits of P oes-guided mechanical ventilation and to determine optimal targets under different conditions, we discuss potential practical approaches, including positive end-expiratory pressure setting in controlled ventilation and assessment of inspiratory effort during assisted modes.

Effects of an asymmetrical high flow nasal cannula interface in hypoxemic patients.

BACKGROUND: Optimal noninvasive respiratory support for patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure should minimize work of breathing without increasing the transpulmonary pressure. Recently, an asymmetrical high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) interface (Duet, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd), in which the caliber of each nasal prong is different, was approved for clinical use. This system might reduce work of breathing by lowering minute ventilation and improving respiratory mechanics. METHODS: We enrolled 10 patients ≥ 18 years of age who were admitted to the Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico ICU in Milan, Italy, and had a PaO2/FiO2 < 300 mmHg during HFNC support with a conventional cannula. We investigated whether the asymmetrical interface, compared to a conventional high flow nasal cannula, reduces minute ventilation and work of breathing. Each patient underwent support with the asymmetrical interface and the conventional interface, applied in a randomized sequence. Each interface was provided at a flow rate of 40 l/min followed by 60 l/min. Patients were continuously monitored with esophageal manometry and electrical impedance tomography. RESULTS: Application of the asymmetrical interface resulted in a -13.5 [-19.4 to (-4.5)] % change in minute ventilation at a flow rate of 40 l/min, p = 0.006 and a -19.6 [-28.0 to (-7.5)] % change at 60 l/min, p = 0.002, that occurred despite no change in PaCO2 (35 [33-42] versus 35 [33-43] mmHg at 40 l/min and 35 [32-41] versus 36 [32-43] mmHg at 60 l/min). Correspondingly, the asymmetrical interface lowered the inspiratory esophageal pressure-time product from 163 [118-210] to 140 [84-159] (cmH2O*s)/min at a flow rate of 40 l/min, p = 0.02 and from 142 [123-178] to 117 [90-137] (cmH2O*s)/min at a flow rate of 60 l/min, p = 0.04. The asymmetrical cannula did not have any impact on oxygenation, the dorsal fraction of ventilation, dynamic lung compliance, or end-expiratory lung impedance, suggesting no major effect on PEEP, lung mechanics, or alveolar recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: An asymmetrical HFNC interface reduces minute ventilation and work of breathing in patients with mild-to-moderate hypoxemic respiratory failure supported with a conventional interface. This appears to be primarily driven by increased ventilatory efficiency due to enhanced CO2 clearance from the upper airway.

Clinical risk factors for increased respiratory drive in intubated hypoxemic patients.

BACKGROUND: There is very limited evidence identifying factors that increase respiratory drive in hypoxemic intubated patients. Most physiological determinants of respiratory drive cannot be directly assessed at the bedside (e.g., neural inputs from chemo- or mechano-receptors), but clinical risk factors commonly measured in intubated patients could be correlated with increased drive. We aimed to identify clinical risk factors independently associated with increased respiratory drive in intubated hypoxemic patients. METHODS: We analyzed the physiological dataset from a multicenter trial on intubated hypoxemic patients on pressure support (PS). Patients with simultaneous assessment of the inspiratory drop in airway pressure at 0.1-s during an occlusion (P0.1) and risk factors for increased respiratory drive on day 1 were included. We evaluated the independent correlation of the following clinical risk factors for increased drive with P0.1: severity of lung injury (unilateral vs. bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, PaO2/FiO2, ventilatory ratio); arterial blood gases (PaO2, PaCO2 and pHa); sedation (RASS score and drug type); SOFA score; arterial lactate; ventilation settings (PEEP, level of PS, addition of sigh breaths). RESULTS: Two-hundred seventeen patients were included. Clinical risk factors independently correlated with higher P0.1 were bilateral infiltrates (increase ratio [IR] 1.233, 95%CI 1.047-1.451, p = 0.012); lower PaO2/FiO2 (IR 0.998, 95%CI 0.997-0.999, p = 0.004); higher ventilatory ratio (IR 1.538, 95%CI 1.267-1.867, p < 0.001); lower pHa (IR 0.104, 95%CI 0.024-0.464, p = 0.003). Higher PEEP was correlated with lower P0.1 (IR 0.951, 95%CI 0.921-0.982, p = 0.002), while sedation depth and drugs were not associated with P0.1. CONCLUSIONS: Independent clinical risk factors for higher respiratory drive in intubated hypoxemic patients include the extent of lung edema and of ventilation-perfusion mismatch, lower pHa, and lower PEEP, while sedation strategy does not affect drive. These data underline the multifactorial nature of increased respiratory drive.

Heterogeneity of Ventilation/Perfusion Mismatch at Different Levels of PEEP and in Mechanical Phenotypes of COVID-19 ARDS.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19-related ARDS is characterized by severe hypoxemia with initially preserved lung compliance and impaired ventilation/perfusion (V̇/Q̇) matching. PEEP can increase end-expiratory lung volume, but its effect on V̇/Q̇ mismatch in COVID-19-related ARDS is not clear. METHODS: We enrolled intubated and mechanically ventilated subjects with COVID-19 ARDS and used the automatic lung parameter estimator (ALPE) to measure V̇/Q̇. Respiratory mechanics measurements, shunt, and V̇/Q̇ mismatch (low V̇/Q̇ and high V̇/Q̇) were collected at 3 PEEP levels (clinical PEEP = intermediate PEEP, low PEEP [clinical - 50%], and high PEEP [clinical + 50%]). A mixed-effect model was used to evaluate the impact of PEEP on V̇/Q̇. We also investigated if PEEP might have a different effect on V̇/Q̇ mismatch in 2 different respiratory mechanics phenotypes, that is, high elastance/low compliance (phenotype H) and low elastance/high compliance (phenotype L). RESULTS: Seventeen subjects with COVID-related ARDS age 66 [60-71] y with a PaO2 /FIO2 of 141 ± 74 mm Hg were studied at low PEEP = 5.6 ± 2.2 cm H2O, intermediate PEEP = 10.6 ± 3.8 cm H2O, and high PEEP = 15 ± 5 cm H2O. Shunt, low V̇/Q̇, high V̇/Q̇, and alveolar dead space were not significantly influenced, on average, by PEEP. Respiratory system compliance decreased significantly when increasing PEEP without significant variation of PaO2 /FIO2 (P = .26). In the 2 phenotypes, PEEP had opposite effects on shunt, with a decrease in the phenotype L and an increase in phenotype H (P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with COVID-related ARDS placed on invasive mechanical ventilation for > 48 h, PEEP had a heterogeneous effect on V̇/Q̇ mismatch and, on average, higher levels were not able to reduce shunt. The subject's compliance could influence the effect of PEEP on V̇/Q̇ mismatch since an increased shunt was observed in subjects with lower compliance, whereas the opposite occurred in those with higher compliance.

Integrating electrical impedance tomography and transpulmonary pressure monitoring to personalize PEEP in hypoxemic patients undergoing pressure support ventilation.

Monitoring with electrical impedance tomography (EIT) during a decremental PEEP trial has been used to identify the PEEP that yields the optimal balance of pulmonary overdistension and collapse. This method is based on pixel-level changes in respiratory system compliance and depends on fixed or measured airway driving pressure. We developed a novel approach to quantify overdistension and collapse during pressure support ventilation (PSV) by integrating transpulmonary pressure and EIT monitoring and performed pilot tests in three hypoxemic patients. We report that our experimental approach is feasible and capable of identifying a PEEP that balances overdistension and collapse in intubated hypoxemic patients undergoing PSV.

The relationship between antithrombin administration and inflammation during veno-venous ECMO.

Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is used in the most severe cases of respiratory failure and further exacerbates the patients' inflammatory status. Antithrombin is supplemented during ECMO for its anticoagulant effects, but it also deploys anti-inflammatory properties. In this pre-specified ancillary study of the GATRA trial [NCT03208270] we aimed to evaluate the relationship between antithrombin and inflammation during ECMO. Forty-six patients were included in the study, 23 were randomized to receive antithrombin to maintain a level of 80-120% (study group) and 23 were randomized not to be supplemented (control group). Anticoagulation was provided in both groups with heparin infusion. Six cytokines were measured at 5 timepoints from prior to ECMO start to 7 days after ECMO removal. Cytokines decreased during the study but overall were not very different in the two groups. Testing the interaction between the study group and timepoints suggests that the administration of antithrombin led to a more rapid decrease over time of IL-6, IL-1ß, TNF-⍺ and Pro-ADM. Plasma levels of antithrombin (either endogenous or exogenous) were negatively associated with all cytokines. Inflammation decreases during ECMO but a causal effect of antithrombin administration on the reduction of inflammation (and its clinical relevance) must be confirmed by appropriately powered studies.

Effects of PEEP on regional ventilation-perfusion mismatch in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

PURPOSE: In the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), decreasing Ventilation-Perfusion [Formula: see text] mismatch might enhance lung protection. We investigated the regional effects of higher Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) on [Formula: see text] mismatch and their correlation with recruitability. We aimed to verify whether PEEP improves regional [Formula: see text] mismatch, and to study the underlying mechanisms. METHODS: In fifteen patients with moderate and severe ARDS, two PEEP levels (5 and 15 cmH2O) were applied in random order. [Formula: see text] mismatch was assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography at each PEEP. Percentage of ventilation and perfusion reaching different ranges of [Formula: see text] ratios were analyzed in 3 gravitational lung regions, leading to precise assessment of their distribution throughout different [Formula: see text] mismatch compartments. Recruitability between the two PEEP levels was measured by the recruitment-to-inflation ratio method. RESULTS: In the non-dependent region, at higher PEEP, ventilation reaching the normal [Formula: see text] compartment (p = 0.018) increased, while it decreased in the high [Formula: see text] one (p = 0.023). In the middle region, at PEEP 15 cmH2O, ventilation and perfusion to the low [Formula: see text] compartment decreased (p = 0.006 and p = 0.011) and perfusion to normal [Formula: see text] increased (p = 0.003). In the dependent lung, the percentage of blood flowing through the non-ventilated compartment decreased (p = 0.041). Regional [Formula: see text] mismatch improvement was correlated to lung recruitability and changes in regional tidal volume. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ARDS, higher PEEP optimizes the distribution of both ventilation (in the non-dependent areas) and perfusion (in the middle and dependent lung). Bedside measure of recruitability is associated with improved [Formula: see text] mismatch.

Inhaled CO2 vs. Hypercapnia Obtained by Low Tidal Volume or Instrumental Dead Space in Unilateral Pulmonary Artery Ligation: Any Difference for Lung Protection?

Background: Unilateral ligation of the pulmonary artery (UPAL) induces bilateral lung injury in pigs undergoing controlled mechanical ventilation. Possible mechanisms include redistribution of ventilation toward the non-ligated lung and hypoperfusion of the ligated lung. The addition of 5% CO2 to the inspiratory gas (FiCO2) prevents the injury, but it is not clear whether lung protection is a direct effect of CO2 inhalation or it is mediated by plasmatic hypercapnia. This study aims to compare the effects and mechanisms of FiCO2 vs. hypercapnia induced by low tidal volume ventilation or instrumental dead space. Methods: Healthy pigs underwent left UPAL and were allocated for 48 h to the following: Volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) with VT 10 ml/kg (injury, n = 6); VCV plus 5% FiCO2 (FiCO2, n = 7); VCV with VT 6 ml/kg (low VT, n = 6); VCV plus additional circuit dead space (instrumental VD, n = 6). Histological score, regional compliance, wet-to-dry ratio, and inflammatory infiltrate were assessed to evaluate lung injury at the end of the study. To investigate the mechanisms of protection, we quantified the redistribution of ventilation to the non-ligated lung, as the ratio between the percentage of tidal volume to the right and to the left lung (VTRIGHT/LEFT), and the hypoperfusion of the ligated lung as the percentage of blood flow reaching the left lung (PerfusionLEFT). Results: In the left ligated lung, injury was prevented only in the FiCO2 group, as indicated by lower histological score, higher regional compliance, lower wet-to-dry ratio and lower density of inflammatory cells compared to other groups. For the right lung, the histological score was lower both in the FiCO2 and in the low VT groups, but the other measures of injury showed lower intensity only in the FiCO2 group. VTRIGHT/LEFT was lower and PerfusionLEFT was higher in the FiCO2 group compared to other groups. Conclusion: In a model of UPAL, inhaled CO2 but not hypercapnia grants bilateral lung protection. Mechanisms of protection include reduced overdistension of the non-ligated and increased perfusion of the ligated lung.

Effects of Prone Position on Lung Recruitment and Ventilation-Perfusion Matching in Patients With COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Combined CT Scan/Electrical Impedance Tomography Study.

OBJECTIVES: Prone positioning allows to improve oxygenation and decrease mortality rate in COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (C-ARDS). However, the mechanisms leading to these effects are not fully understood. The aim of this study is to assess the physiologic effects of pronation by the means of CT scan and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). DESIGN: Experimental, physiologic study. SETTING: Patients were enrolled from October 2020 to March 2021 in an Italian dedicated COVID-19 ICU. PATIENTS: Twenty-one intubated patients with moderate or severe C-ARDS. INTERVENTIONS: First, patients were transported to the CT scan facility, and image acquisition was performed in prone, then supine position. Back to the ICU, gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and ventilation and perfusion EIT-based analysis were provided toward the end of two 30 minutes steps (e.g., in supine, then prone position). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Prone position induced recruitment in the dorsal part of the lungs (12.5% ± 8.0%; p < 0.001 from baseline) and derecruitment in the ventral regions (-6.9% ± 5.2%; p < 0.001). These changes led to a global increase in recruitment (6.0% ± 6.7%; p < 0.001). Respiratory system compliance did not change with prone position (45 ± 15 vs 45 ± 18 mL/cm H2O in supine and prone position, respectively; p = 0.957) suggesting a decrease in atelectrauma. This hypothesis was supported by the decrease of a time-impedance curve concavity index designed as a surrogate for atelectrauma (1.41 ± 0.16 vs 1.30 ± 0.16; p = 0.001). Dead space measured by EIT was reduced in the ventral regions of the lungs, and the dead-space/shunt ratio decreased significantly (5.1 [2.3-23.4] vs 4.3 [0.7-6.8]; p = 0.035), showing an improvement in ventilation-perfusion matching. CONCLUSIONS: Several changes are associated with prone position in C-ARDS: increased lung recruitment, decreased atelectrauma, and improved ventilation-perfusion matching. These physiologic effects may be associated with more protective ventilation.

Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure guided by end-expiratory lung volume in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: study protocol for the multicenter, randomized IPERPEEP trial.

BACKGROUND: In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is variable according to different degrees of lung recruitability. The search for a tool to individualize PEEP based on patients' individual response is warranted. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) assessment by nitrogen washing-washout aids bedside estimation of PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment and may therefore help titrate PEEP on patient's individual recruitability. We designed a randomized trial to test whether an individualized PEEP setting protocol driven by EELV measurement may improve a composite clinical outcome in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS (IPERPEEP trial). METHODS: IPERPEEP is an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial that will be conducted in 10 intensive care units in Italy and will enroll 132 ARDS patients showing PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 150 mmHg within 24 h from endotracheal intubation while on mechanical ventilation with PEEP 5 cmH2O. To standardize lung volumes at study initiation, all patients will undergo mechanical ventilation with tidal volume of 6 ml/kg of predicted body weight and PEEP set to obtain a plateau pressure within 28 and 30 cmH2O for 30 min (EXPRESS PEEP). Afterwards, a 5-step decremental PEEP trial will be conducted (EXPRESS PEEP to PEEP 5 cmH2O), and EELV will be measured at each step. Recruitment-to-inflation ratio will be calculated for each PEEP range from EELV difference. Patients will be then randomized to receive mechanical ventilation with PEEP set according to the optimal recruitment observed in the PEEP trial (IPERPEEP arm) trial or to achieve a plateau pressure of 28-30 cmH2O (control arm, EXPRESS strategy). In both groups, tidal volume size, use of prone positioning and neuromuscular blocking agents, and weaning from PEEP and from mechanical ventilation will be standardized. The primary endpoint of the study is a composite clinical outcome incorporating in-ICU mortality, 60-day ventilator-free days, and serum interleukin-6 concentration over the course of the initial 72 h of treatment. DISCUSSION: The IPERPEEP study is a randomized trial powered to elucidate whether an individualized PEEP setting protocol based on bedside assessment of lung recruitability can improve a composite clinical outcome during moderate-to-severe ARDS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04012073 . Registered 9 July 2019.

Expert opinion document: "Electrical impedance tomography: applications from the intensive care unit and beyond".

Mechanical ventilation is a life-saving technology, but it can also inadvertently induce lung injury and increase morbidity and mortality. Currently, there is no easy method of assessing the impact that ventilator settings have on the degree of lung inssflation. Computed tomography (CT), the gold standard for visually monitoring lung function, can provide detailed regional information of the lung. Unfortunately, it necessitates moving critically ill patients to a special diagnostic room and involves exposure to radiation. A technique introduced in the 1980s, electrical impedance tomography (EIT) can non-invasively provide similar monitoring of lung function. However, while CT provides information on the air content, EIT monitors ventilation-related changes of lung volume and changes of end expiratory lung volume (EELV). Over the past several decades, EIT has moved from the research lab to commercially available devices that are used at the bedside. Being complementary to well-established radiological techniques and conventional pulmonary monitoring, EIT can be used to continuously visualize the lung function at the bedside and to instantly assess the effects of therapeutic maneuvers on regional ventilation distribution. EIT provides a means of visualizing the regional distribution of ventilation and changes of lung volume. This ability is particularly useful when therapy changes are intended to achieve a more homogenous gas distribution in mechanically ventilated patients. Besides the unique information provided by EIT, its convenience and safety contribute to the increasing perception expressed by various authors that EIT has the potential to be used as a valuable tool for optimizing PEEP and other ventilator settings, either in the operative room and in the intensive care unit. The effects of various therapeutic interventions and applications on ventilation distribution have already been assessed with the help of EIT, and this document gives an overview of the literature that has been published in this context.