Indicators of anxiety and depression in women with the fragile X premutation: assessment of a clinical sample.

BACKGROUND: Current research suggests that depression and anxiety may be common problems in women with the fragile X (FMR1) premutation. METHODS: To learn more about this in a clinical setting, we asked 33 women with the FMR1 premutation and 20 women without the FMR1 premutation to complete the Brief Carroll Depression Scale (Brief CDS) and the Multidimensional Anxiety Questionnaire (MAQ) and to provide information about mental health medication use. Questionnaire findings were compared between groups and with normative samples. Trinucleotide (CGG) repeat counts were also correlated to checklist findings. RESULTS: Both women with the FMR1 premutation and the comparison group had high current mental health medication use (33% vs. 35%). Approximately 1/3 of the women from both groups had high Brief CDS Total T-scores (33% vs. 30%). More women with the FMR1 premutation had at least one elevated MAQ Total or sub-scale T-score than the comparison group (39% vs. 10%, P = 0.03). Twenty-one per cent of women with the FMR1 premutation had all three of the indicators of distress targeted in this study vs. none of the women in the comparison samples (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant correlation between CGG repeat size and abnormal checklist findings using the Spearman rank correlation, although a higher percentage of women with >100 CGG repeats (57%) had an elevated Brief CDS Total T-score than women with 100 CGG repeats also had all three indicators of anxiety and depression (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Women with the FMR1 premutation appear to have a high incidence of depression and increased symptoms of anxiety. Screening tools like the Brief CDS and the MAQ may be useful to identify these women in the clinic setting. Positive identification could lead to increased mental health care and treatment.

Longitudinal study of the carrier testing process for fragile X syndrome: perceptions and coping.

This paper reports the results of a longitudinal study of women at-risk to inherit the fragile X mutation. It addresses 1) how upsetting the women perceived their carrier information to be, 2) how serious a problem they perceive fragile X syndrome to be, and 3) descriptions of feelings about the carrier testing process. The study sample consisted of 42 women (20 carriers and 22 noncarriers). There were two measurement times (just prior to carrier testing and after learning actual carrier status). The measures used were a Fragile X Visual Analog Scale and a structured interview. At time 1, being at-risk was reported to be upsetting and fragile X syndrome was perceived to be a serious problem. For the women found to be carriers there was no change from time 1 to time 2 on any of the items. Significant change occurred in the non-carriers. They were significantly less upset at time 2 after receiving the results of their carrier test than at time 1. They also perceived fragile X syndrome to be a more serious problem than they did at time 1 and a more serious problem than the carriers at time 2. Themes found included concerns that carrier status for fragile X syndrome presented a barrier for having healthy biological children and concern for children's and grandchildren's adaptation to their own carrier status. Coping behaviors were activated to manage the emotions related to these concerns. The coping behaviors identified were minimization, acceptance of the possibility of being a carrier, a sense of being able to deal with the outcome of the carrier test, positive comparison, problem solving, and positive interpretation.

Carrier testing in fragile X syndrome: effect on self-concept.

The purpose of the study was to explore self-concept in women at risk for inheriting the fragile X mutation. Time 1 measures were obtained prior to carrier testing and Time 2 measures were collected approximately 5 months after learning carrier status. The sample consisted of 42 women from 17 families. Measures included the Tennessee Self-Concept Scale (TSCS), the fragile X Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and a structured interview. The TSCS provided a global measure of self-concept and the fragile X VAS and structured interview provided a contextual measure of self related to carrier status. Results indicated that there were no differences initially between carriers and noncarriers and no change from Time 1 to Time 2 on the TSCS. Analysis of the Time 1 fragile X VAS means for the total sample found a reduction in positive feelings about self. Analysis of the Time 2 fragile X VAS found that noncarriers reported improvement in feelings about self, with no change in feelings about self found in the carriers. Responses from the structured interview indicated that the feelings regarding self in the context of genetic testing are not related to global self-concept, but result from concerns regarding the implications of a positive carrier test for themselves and their families. This information highlights areas related to carrier testing that warrant further investigation and may ultimately result in modifications to the genetic counseling.

Physical characteristics of young boys with fragile X syndrome: reasons for difficulties in making a diagnosis in young males.

Fragile X syndrome is the leading form of hereditary mental retardation, but the condition is still underdiagnosed in young children. Because of concern that the fragile X phenotype is subtle in young boys and therefore contributes to underdiagnosis of the disorder, we evaluated 73 boys (36 with fragile X and 37 same-age boys who were fragile X negative) using a checklist that we devised to learn which characteristics might be the most useful for alerting professionals to this diagnosis. After a multiple comparisons adjustment, only 4 of 42 characteristics differed significantly in their distributions between the two groups of boys (P < 0.0012), but 10 other items may also have predictive value for fragile X syndrome (P < 0.01). Four additional items occurred in at least 80% of boys with fragile X and may also be helpful for the clinician. Professionals who work with developmentally delayed children should be aware of these 18 clinical characteristics and some of the behavior characteristics commonly seen in boys with fragile X so that they can readily diagnose patients.

Parental attitudes regarding carrier testing in children at risk for fragile X syndrome.

Sixty-five parents of individuals affected by fragile X syndrome who attended the National Fragile X Conference in Portland, Oregon (1996), were asked to complete a survey assessing parental level of concern about carrier testing in children at risk for fragile X syndrome. All subjects completed a 15-item paper and pencil Likert response scale measure that was developed specifically for this study. The items included parental rights and duties, psychological adjustment, adaptation, discrimination, harm, childbearing, and interpersonal relationships. The major concern of the parents was that their children have knowledge of their carrier status prior to becoming sexually active and that their children be able to marry informed of their genetic risk. Mothers were significantly more concerned than fathers about raising their children with the knowledge of their carrier status. A sense of parental right to make the decision regarding carrier testing for children was associated with concerns about (1) behavioral or educational problems, (2) knowledge of carrier status prior to sexual activity or marriage, and (3) adjustment of the children to knowledge of their carrier status. As the sample was drawn from a unique population of parents, the results of this survey should be interpreted with caution. The findings of this study suggest a model of parents providing anticipatory guidance for their children to help them adjust to carrier information and for their children to have this knowledge prior to the possibility of reproduction.

Carrier testing in the fragile X syndrome: attitudes and opinions of obligate carriers.

This study surveyed obligate carriers of the fragile X syndrome fra(X) to ascertain opinions and attitudes regarding carrier testing. Female carriers of fra(X) syndrome were recruited during their visits to the Fragile X Clinic at Duke University Medical Center. Twenty-eight obligate carriers completed a 48 question structured interview and a visual analog scale (VAS). Strong trends in the responses were identified. Fra(X) syndrome was viewed as a very serious problem and the risk to offspring high. Subjects reported that prior knowledge of carrier status would have changed their reproductive plans. All felt that relatives should be informed about the inheritance of fra(X) syndrome; the mean age given for preferred age to inform their children of the inheritance of fra(X) syndrome was 12 years, and mean age given for optimal timing of carrier testing was 10 years. The women interviewed indicated that growing up with knowledge of their carrier status would have been preferable to learning this information as adults and they endorsed an aggressive approach to informing and testing their children. Further investigation is warranted to determine the psychological consequences of carrier testing for fra(X) syndrome in order to develop appropriate guidelines for testing and informing individuals at risk for fra(X) syndrome.

A fragile X male with a broad smear on Southern blot analysis representing 100-500 CGG repeats and no methylation at the EagI site of the FMR-1 gene.

Fragile X DNA studies were carried out on all obligate carriers of a large fragile X family with 10 mentally retarded individuals. One 64-year-old carrier man with an altered FMR-1 allele was not described as being mentally retarded or as having any limitations in function. He was married, raised 8 children, and worked as an auto mechanic. On examination, he had macrocephaly and mild macroorchidism but few of the other typical physical findings of males with fragile X syndrome. His Full Scale IQ is 73, and his Vineland Adaptive Behavior Composite is 73. On the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised, he achieved standard scores of 64 in Reading, 55 in Math, and 83 in Knowledge. His DNA findings showed a broad smear on Southern blot analysis of 100-500 CGG repeats and no methylation at the EagI site upstream of the FMR-1 protein coding region. His FMR-1 protein production is 12% of normal. His daughters all have large premutations, with somatic instability in the size of the CGG repeat lengths. They all have evidence of academic underachievement and 2 have physical characteristics frequently described in individuals with fragile X.

Trajectories and profiles of adaptive behavior in males with fragile X syndrome: multicenter studies.

We conducted two multicenter studies on adaptive trajectories and profiles in males with fragile X syndrome. Study 1 longitudinally assessed 29 males ages 1-20 years using age-equivalent scores from the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Fragile X boys ages 1-10 years showed significant gains in adaptive skills from first to second testing; males ages 11-20 years were stable in their adaptive development. Study 2 cross-sectionally examined 132 males ages 1-20 years. Significant age-related gains were found in boys ages 1-10, particularly in preschool children. Subjects ages 11-20 showed increased variability and nonsignificant relations between age and adaptive skills. Preliminary findings from 26 young adults with fragile X syndrome ages 21-40 years showed stable age-equivalent adaptive scores during these years. Relative strengths in daily living skills and weaknesses in communication were only evident among older subjects. Significant relations were found between adaptive behavior standard scores and IQ; these two scores also showed age-related declines that likely parallel one another. Findings are related to adaptive features in other genetic syndromes, and to directions for future adaptive behavior research.

Fryns syndrome survivors and neurologic outcome.

Fryns syndrome is an autosomal recessive multiple congenital anomaly syndrome characterized by diaphragmatic hernia, unusual facies, and distal limb hypoplasia. It was first reported as a lethal condition. We report on a three-year-old survivor with Fryns syndrome, and provide a review on the outcome of other survivors. Patients who survive the neonatal period represent 14% of reported cases. Characteristics of survivors include less frequent diaphragmatic hernia and milder lung hypoplasia, absence of complex cardiac malformation, and neurologic impairment. Multiple central nervous system abnormalities have been reported in Fryns syndrome, including agenesis of the corpus callosum, Dandy-Walker abnormality, cerebellar heterotopias, cerebellar hypoplasia, enlarged ventricles, and hypoplasia of the olfactory bulbs. Our patient exhibited profound mental retardation. He had malformations of gyration and sulcation, particularly around the central sulcus, and hypoplastic optic tracts beyond the optic chiasm. Understanding of long-term outcome of survivors is important for counseling of families with Fryns syndrome. Careful brain examination is advised; however, a normal radiological brain examination does not preclude developmental delay. The spectrum of individual outcome and of associated anomalies indicates that individual evaluation, including imaging for structural brain malformation, is strongly advised.

Aberrant behaviors of young boys with fragile X syndrome.

To determine whether aberrant behaviors described in boys with fragile X syndrome distinguish them from other boys with developmental disabilities, we asked the primary caregivers of 55 boys with fragile X and 57 matched controls to complete five behavioral questionnaires. Twenty-one items distinguished the groups. Principal components analysis (PCA) yielded five behavioral clusters: abnormal language, tactile defensiveness, poor self-control, poor eye contact/shyness, and hand flapping. Boys with fragile X were found times more likely to have both tactile defensiveness and abnormal language. The presence of these abnormal behaviors in boys with developmental delays warrants further assessment for fragile X.

Evidence that methylation of the FMR-I locus is responsible for variable phenotypic expression of the fragile X syndrome.

DNA at the FMR-1 locus was analyzed by Southern blot using probe StB12.3 in an unusual fragile X family with six brothers, three of whom are affected with fragile X to varying degrees, two of whom are nonpenetrant carriers, and one of whom is unaffected. Fragile X chromosome studies, detailed physical examinations, and psychological testing were completed on all six. Two of the affected brothers and the two nonpenetrant brothers were found to be methylation mosaics. The three affected males spanned the phenotypic and cognitive spectrum of the fragile X syndrome. A correlation was seen between the degree of methylation and the phenotypic expression identified in the three affected males. The two males initially classified as nonpenetrant were found to have mild phenotypic expression which consisted of minor cognitive deficits and a partial physical phenotype. These two, who were negative on fragile X chromosome studies, were found on DNA analysis to have large broad smears, with approximately 97% of the DNA unmethylated. The results described here indicate that some "nonpenetrant" carrier males may have varying amounts of methylation of the FMR-1 region, which can result in mild expression of the fragile X syndrome. The apparently mild phenotypic and cognitive expression of the fragile X syndrome in the two males, initially classified as nonpenetrant, who are mosaic for hypermethylation of an expansion of the CGG repeat in the premutation range, indicates that expression of the syndrome is not confined to males with large, hypermethylated expansions (full mutation) but has instead a gradient effect with a threshold for the full expression of the phenotype.

Declining IQs of young males with the fragile X syndrome.

Retrospective, longitudinal data were obtained on 21 boys with the fragile X syndrome to assess whether their IQs declined during childhood. For the group as a whole, IQs dropped significantly; 13 boys showed a significant decline at retest. Our results are consistent with reports that young boys with the fragile X syndrome may be only mildly impaired, whereas adults with this syndrome are usually moderately or severely retarded. Parents of young boys with the fragile X syndrome should be cautioned that the IQ of their child may decline.

Control over stress, type A behavior pattern, and response to stress.

This study was conducted to examine (a) differences in physiological response of Type A and Type B individuals to conditions that varied in both controllability and consistency of controllability over an aversive stimulus and (b) whether Type A relative to Type B individuals employ more denial and/or projection in cognitively coping with arousing situations as well as differ in being preoccupied in such situations. Ninety-six college men were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: no control over shock, consistent control over shock, intermittent control over shock, and low stress. The results indicated that relative to Type B subjects, Type A subjects manifested (a) greater pulse rates and systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the consistent control condition, (b) greater systolic blood pressure in the no-control condition, and (c) greater diastolic blood pressure in the intermittent control condition. Type A subjects relative to Type B subjects also employed more of both denial and projection across the three high-stress conditions but did not differ in how preoccupied they were.