Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Exp Dent Res ; 5(4): 438-446, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31452955

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Dental caries is a highly prevalent infectious disease that causes tooth decay. While no single bacterial species is causative of dental caries, the role of the oral microbiome in oral health and caries is gaining interest. The purpose of this study is to compare the major species present in whole saliva samples from caries-free and caries-active children using the IBIS Universal Biosensor. Material and Methods: The abundant microbial species in ninety-five whole saliva samples from caries-free and caries-active subjects were characterized using the IBIS Universal Biosensor. Results: Twenty-four genera and sixty-five species were detected. Candida and Streptococcus were common across samples, and often the dominant genus. While we did not observe a strong association between the most abundant species and oral health, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Rothia mucilaginosa were enriched in children with active caries; while, Staphylococcus epidermidis was enriched in caries-free children. Conclusions: These study trends observed suggest that microbial markers in saliva may serve as predictors of oral health and thus aid in diagnosis and treatments for prevention of caries. Consistent with competitive interactions, we also observed negative associations between Streptococcus pneumoniae and other streptococcal species, Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis, Candida and Neisseria, and Saccharomyces and Streptococcus.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Dental Caries/diagnosis , Dental Plaque/microbiology , Microbiota/genetics , Saliva/microbiology , Adolescent , Biosensing Techniques/instrumentation , Child , DNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Dental Caries/microbiology , Dental Caries/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Young Adult
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 16: 338, 2016 07 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27448413

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The role of microbial colonization in disease is complex. Novel molecular tools to detect colonization offer theoretical improvements over traditional methods. We evaluated PCR/Electrospray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry (PCR/ESI-TOF-MS) as a screening tool to study colonization of healthy military service members. METHODS: We assessed 101 healthy Soldiers using PCR/ESI-TOF-MS on nares, oropharynx, and groin specimens for the presence of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (GNB), fungi, and antibiotic resistance genes. A second set of swabs was processed by traditional culture, followed by identification using the BD Phoenix automated system; comparison between PCR/ESI-TOF-MS and culture was carried out only for GNB. RESULTS: Using PCR/ESI-TOF-MS, at least one colonizing organism was found on each individual: mean (SD) number of organisms per subject of 11.8(2.8). The mean number of organisms in the nares, groin and oropharynx was 3.8(1.3), 3.8(1.4) and 4.2(2), respectively. The most commonly detected organisms were aerobic gram-positive bacteria: primarily coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (101 subjects: 341 organisms), Streptococcus pneumoniae (54 subjects: 57 organisms), Staphylococcus aureus (58 subjects: 80 organisms) and Nocardia asteroides (45 subjects: 50 organisms). The mecA gene was found in 96 subjects. The most commonly found GNB was Haemophilus influenzae (20 subjects: 21 organisms) and the most common anaerobe was Propionibacterium acnes (59 subjects). Saccharomyces species (30 subjects) were the most common fungi detected. Only one GNB (nares E. coli) was identified in the same subject by both diagnostic systems. CONCLUSION: PCR/ESI-TOF-MS detected common colonizing organisms and identified more typically-virulent bacteria in asymptomatic, healthy adults. PCR/ESI-TOF-MS appears to be a useful method for detecting bacterial and fungal organisms, but further clinical correlation and validation studies are needed.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Fungi/isolation & purification , Microbiota , Military Personnel , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization , Adult , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/growth & development , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/growth & development , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Female , Fungi/genetics , Fungi/growth & development , Gram-Negative Bacteria/genetics , Gram-Negative Bacteria/growth & development , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Health , Humans , Male , Microbiological Techniques/methods , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Pilot Projects , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Young Adult
3.
Curr Protoc Microbiol ; 40: 1E.9.1-1E.9.9, 2016 Feb 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26855284

ABSTRACT

Nucleic acids can be obtained in numerous ways from clinical specimens; however, the quality of the nucleic acid is only as good as the sampling and isolation protocol. While nucleic acids may be extracted they may not be representative of the original source. Large areas of tissue and explanted hardware must be successfully surveyed to reflect the overall clinical picture. Once good sampling technique has been established, successful bacterial nucleic acid isolation is essential. Clinical samples may be difficult to process because of the presence of scar tissue, bone, implants, and bacterial biofilms. The following protocols provide details on sampling techniques and DNA isolation from a variety of clinical samples which can then be used in downstream molecular applications including PCR-MS-ESI-TOF technology.


Subject(s)
DNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Body Fluids/microbiology , Equipment and Supplies/microbiology , Humans
4.
BMC Cancer ; 16: 52, 2016 Feb 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26841926

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Toll-like receptors (TLRs) recognize known molecules from microbes and have an established role in tumorigenesis. Using a rat model of esophageal adenocarcinoma, and human clinical samples, we investigated genes central to TLR-mediated signal transduction and characterized the esophageal microbiome across the spectrum of esophageal adenocarcinoma carcinogenesis. METHODS: We surgically induced bile/acid reflux in rats and their esophagi were harvested at 40 weeks post-surgery. Tissue samples from the model were selected for gene expression profiling. Additionally, for rat and human samples microbiome analysis was performed using PCR-ESI-MS-TOF technology with validation by fluorescence in situ hybridization. RESULTS: Gene expression results in the rat model indicated a significant upregulation of TLRs 1-3, 6, 7 and 9 in EAC compared to normal epithelium. PCR-ESI-MS-TOF analysis revealed a prevalence of Escherichia coli in Barrett's esophagus (60%) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (100%), which was validated by fluorescence in situ hybridization. In the human clinical samples, Streptococcus pneumonia was detected in high abundance in gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus (50-70%) in comparison to tumor adjacent normal epithelium, dysplasia, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (20-30%). E. coli was detected in the Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma groups but was absent in the tumor adjacent normal epithelium, dysplasia, and the gastroesophageal reflux disease groups. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated an association between the TLR signaling pathway and E. coli hinting towards possible early molecular changes being mediated by microbes in the rat model of esophageal adenocarcinoma carcinogenesis. Studies on human clinical samples also corroborate results to some extent; however, a study with larger sample size is needed to further explore this association.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Barrett Esophagus/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Toll-Like Receptors/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/microbiology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Animals , Barrett Esophagus/microbiology , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Carcinogenesis/genetics , Disease Models, Animal , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli/pathogenicity , Esophageal Neoplasms/microbiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Microbiota/genetics , Rats , Signal Transduction/genetics , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genetics , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Streptococcus pneumoniae/pathogenicity , Toll-Like Receptors/biosynthesis
5.
Scand J Infect Dis ; 45(10): 752-9, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23957540

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) Staphylococcus aureus colonization is associated with increased rates of infection. Rapid and reliable detection methods are needed to identify colonization of nares and extra-nare sites, particularly given recent reports of oropharynx-only colonization. Detection methods for MRSA/MSSA colonization include culture, PCR, and novel methods such as PCR/electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS). METHODS: We evaluated 101 healthy military members for S. aureus colonization in the nares, oropharynx, axilla, and groin, using CHROMagar S. aureus medium and Xpert SA Nasal Complete PCR for MRSA/MSSA detection. The same subjects were screened in the nares, oropharynx, and groin using PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. RESULTS: By culture, 3 subjects were MRSA-colonized (all oropharynx) and 34 subjects were MSSA-colonized (all 4 sites). PCR detected oropharyngeal MRSA in 2 subjects, which correlated with culture findings. By PCR, 47 subjects were MSSA-colonized (all 4 sites); however, 43 axillary samples were invalid, 39 of which were associated with deodorant/anti-perspirant use (93%, p < 0.01). By PCR/ESI-TOF-MS, 4 subjects were MRSA-colonized, 2 in the nares and 2 in the oropharynx; however, neither of these correlated with positive MRSA cultures. Twenty-eight subjects had MSSA by PCR/ESI-TOF-MS, and 41 were found to have possible MRSA (S. aureus with mecA and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS)). CONCLUSION: The overall 3% MRSA colonization rate is consistent with historical reports, but the oropharynx-only colonization supports more recent findings. In addition, the use of deodorant/anti-perspirant invalidated axillary PCR samples, limiting its utility. Defining MRSA positivity by PCR/ESI-TOF-MS is complicated by co-colonization of S. aureus with CoNS, which can also carry mecA.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Carrier State/diagnosis , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Adult , Carrier State/microbiology , Female , Humans , Male , Methicillin Resistance , Military Personnel , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/chemistry , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development , Young Adult
6.
BMC Infect Dis ; 12: 252, 2012 Oct 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23050585

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Understanding nosocomial pathogen transmission is restricted by culture limitations. Novel platforms, such as PCR-based electron spray ionization-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS), may be useful as investigational tools. METHODS: Traditional clinical microbiology (TCM) and PCR/ESI-TOF-MS were used to recover and detect microorganisms from the hands and personal protective equipment of 10 burn intensive care unit (ICU) healthcare workers providing clinical care at a tertiary care military referral hospital. High-use environmental surfaces were assessed in 9 burn ICU and 10 orthopedic patient rooms. Clinical cultures during the study period were reviewed for pathogen comparison with investigational molecular diagnostic methods. RESULTS: From 158 samples, 142 organisms were identified by TCM and 718 by PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. The molecular diagnostic method detected more organisms (4.5 ± 2.1 vs. 0.9 ± 0.8, p < 0.01) from 99% vs. 67% of samples (p < 0.01). TCM detected S. aureus in 13 samples vs. 21 by PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. Gram-negative organisms were less commonly identified than gram-positive by both methods; especially by TCM. Among all detected bacterial species, similar percentages were typical nosocomial pathogens (18-19%) for TCM vs. PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. PCR/ESI-TOF-MS also detected mecA in 112 samples, vanA in 13, and KPC-3 in 2. MecA was associated (p < 0.01) with codetection of coagulase negative staphylococci but not S. aureus. No vanA was codetected with enterococci; one KPC-3 was detected without Klebsiella spp. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, PCR/ESI-TOF-MS detected more organisms, especially gram-negatives, compared to TCM, but the current assay format is limited by the number of antibiotic resistance determinants it covers. Further large-scale assessments of PCR/ESI-TOF-MS for hospital surveillance are warranted.


Subject(s)
Environmental Microbiology , Hand/microbiology , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Microbiological Techniques/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Burns/complications , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Epidemiologic Methods , Health Personnel , Humans , Tertiary Care Centers , Wound Infection/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...