Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Adv Contracept ; 13(4): 439-51, 1997 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9404553

ABSTRACT

Male condoms made from synthetic materials offer an alternative to latex condoms that may be more acceptable to users, thereby potentially resulting in more protected acts of intercourse. A prospective, noncomparative clinical study was conducted to evaluate the safety of using certain polyurethane materials to make condoms. Fifty-one healthy, contracepting, mutually monogamous couples were recruited between June 30 and November 24, 1993 to use a prototype roll-on polyurethane condom developed by Family Health International. Couples were to use the condoms for 10 consecutive acts of vaginal intercourse over a 4-week period. Baseline and postexposure genital examinations, including colposcopy for female participants, were performed. Fifty couples completed the study requirements and 517 acts of intercourse occurred using the condoms. Two adverse events were reported: irritation of introitus in a female participant and a small irritated erythematous lesion on a male participant's penis. Neither event was considered to be serious and both were resolved without treatment. Breakage and slippage rates were similar to those reported for latex condoms. These results suggest that polyurethane condoms represent a safe, functional and acceptable alternative to latex condoms.


Subject(s)
Condoms , Polyurethanes , Adult , Coitus , Colposcopy , Condoms/adverse effects , Consumer Behavior , Educational Status , Equipment Failure , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Vaginal Smears
2.
Adv Contracept ; 12(3): 187-99, 1996 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8910661

ABSTRACT

This paper presents findings based on a five-year, noncomparative study of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Nepal. The study was designed to evaluate the contraceptive safety, efficacy, and overall acceptability of Norplant. Four hundred and seven women enrolled in the clinical trial, which began in 1985, at two study sites, located in Patan and Kathmandu. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 1, 3 and 6 months after Norplant insertion and every six months thereafter until removal or at the end of five years. Although five pregnancies were reported during the study, only two women (one from each center) were diagnosed as becoming pregnant while using Norplant. The pooled gross cumulative life-table pregnancy rate was 0.6 per 100 women at the end of five years. The pooled cumulative continuation rate was 62 per 100 women at the end of five years. The three most frequently reported reasons for discontinuation were menstrual problems, personal reasons, and medical reasons. Of the 125 women who completed a five-year user satisfaction questionnaire, the majority of the women (86%) planned to continue using contraception after study completion. Of these women, almost one half said they planned to use a second Norplant set. The findings suggest that the Norplant system is a safe, effective, and acceptable method of contraception among Nepalese women.


Subject(s)
Contraceptive Agents, Female , Drug Implants , Levonorgestrel , Adolescent , Adult , Consumer Behavior , Contraceptive Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Contraceptive Agents, Female/adverse effects , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Humans , Levonorgestrel/administration & dosage , Levonorgestrel/adverse effects , Menstruation Disturbances/chemically induced , Nepal , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...