Trans-synaptic degeneration in the optic pathway: Exploring the role of lateral geniculate nucleus in early stages of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Optic pathway is considered an ideal model to study the interaction between inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were acquired in 92 relapsing remitting (RR) MS at clinical onset. Peripapillary RNFL (pRNFL) and macular layers were measured. White matter (WM) and gray matter (GM) lesion volumes (LV), lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) volume, optic radiations (OR) WM LV, thickness of pericalcarine cortex were evaluated. OCT and MRI control groups (healthy controls [HC]-OCT and HC-MRI) were included. RESULTS: A significant thinning of temporal pRNFL and papillo-macular bundle (PMB) was observed (p<0.001) in 16 (17%) patients presented with monocular optic neuritis (MSON+), compared to 76 MSON- and 30 HC (-15 µm). In MSON-, PMB was reduced (-3 µm) compared to HC OCT (p<0.05). INL total volume was increased both in MSON+ (p<0.001) and MSON- (p = 0.033). Inner retinal layers volumes (macular RNFL, GCL and IPL) were significantly decreased in MSON+ compared to HC (p<0.001) and MSON- (p<0.001). Reduced GCL volume in the parafoveal ring was observed in MSON- compared to HCOCT (p < 0.05). LGN volume was significantly reduced only in MSON+ patients compared to HC-MRI (p<0.001) and MSON- (p<0.007). GCL, IPL and GCIP volumes associated with ipsilateral LGN volume in MSON+ and MSON-. Finally, LGN volume associated with visual cortex thickness with no significant difference between MSON+ and MSON-. CONCLUSIONS: Anterograde trans-synaptic degeneration is early detectable in RRMS presenting with optic neuritis but does not involve LGN.

The current treatment of hip arthroplasty revision: a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Acetabular revision surgery is the most challenging aspect in hip prosthetic. There is lack of consensus on the optimal method of reconstructing the acetabular defects. The aim of this systematic review is to take stock of the state of the art on the options available and highlight which type of construct is the most reliable in usual clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The reporting of this systematic review was guided by the standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2020 Statement.Electronic search of MEDLINE was performed from 1991 up to April 2021 to identify relevant studies for this review.  Discussion: various surgical techniques have been adopted and proposed to treat acetabular bone defects: cemented cups, large-sized non-cemented acetabular cups, higher positioned cups, reinforcement rings, cage, oblong cups, custom triflange implants, high porous metal cups and augments. Bone defect defines the type of components to be implanted and among those, outcomes are various depending on the study taken into account, the component used and the degree of initial bone defect. CONCLUSIONS: In acetabular revision surgerythe use of TM cups and augment is a valid option in presence of major bone loss and pelvic discontinuities. In clinical practice the use of TM components replaced rings, while the cup-cage implant replaced conventional cages. TM augments and cups can be considered as the most promising technique in the reconstruction of wide acetabular defects, while the use of cages can be considered as a valid option in the elderly population.

The advantages of a single use retractor for soft tissue protection in direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: the preliminary experience.

The anterior hip approach is a procedure with increasing popularity in hip replacement surgery due to its many benefits and the number of surgeons using it is steadily increasing around the world. Less pain, better results in the first few weeks, reduced dislocation rate are the prerogatives of this approach. We analyzed in a group of 26 patients the use of a soft tissue retractor, Alexis Orthopedic Protector, the CPK values in the first third and fifth postoperative day. The results obtained, normalized, demonstrate a slight reduction in tissue damage using the device compared to a control group. In addition to blood values, improved exposure, distribution of leverage, cleanliness of the field and a potential reduction in infectious risk are advantages for the use of an orthopedic surgery retractor. We believe that the adoption of the Alexis Orthopedic Protector provides numerous improvements during the hip arthroplasty surgical procedure, especially when adopting the direct anterior approach, because it distributes the traction forces around the surgical path resulting in greater visibility. However, the small number of patients is not sufficient to perform an accurate statistical analysis and further studies on larger samples will be required.