Influence of allergic status and nasal polyposis on long-term Benralizumab response in eosinophilic severe asthma.

Objective: It is unclear whether Benralizumab effectiveness in severe eosinophilic asthma can be influenced by nasal polyposis (NP) or allergic status associations. We evaluated whether Benralizumab long-term efficacy in asthma outcomes could be different in subjects with atopy (SAEA) compared to the effectiveness in those without allergies (SNAEA) and in individuals with NP compared to those without NP. Methods: This observational retrospective study considered 95 consecutive patients divided into allergic (SAEA; n:65[68.4%]; skin prick tests positive [SPT] and/or IgE values ≥100 UI/mL), and non-allergic (SNAEA; n:30[31.6%], SPT negative and normal IgE levels<100 UI/mL). Overall population was also divided into two groups according to NP presence (NP+:39[41%] and NP-:56[59%]). Benralizumab treatment mean was19.7±7.2 months (range 12-35). Results: No differences in Benralizumab effectiveness were found in asthma outcomes in patients with/without NP. SNOT-22 improvement was higher in NP+ (-22±24) compared to NP- groups (6.33±15.5;p=0.055). FEV1 (16.33±19.22%), ACT(7.45±3.95) increases and frequency of SABA use (3.37±4.99) reduction were higher in SAEA compared to what obtained in non-allergic subjects (FEV1:8.15±15.6%,p=0.043; ACT:4.89±3.57,p=0.005; SABA use:-1.16±1.84;p=0.015). 93.8% of SAEA patients whereas only 72.2% of SNAEA individuals reduced OC doses at least half after Benralizumab (p=0.035). These results were partially confirmed by linear regression models showing associations between allergic status and FEV1, ACT and SABA use changes (ß=8.37;p=0.048, ß=2.056;p=0.033 and ß=-2.184;p=0.042 respectively). Conclusion: Benralizumab effectiveness in asthma appears to be independent of NP presence. The allergic eosinophilic disease, compared to just eosinophilic asthma, may be a more severe phenotype. Benralizumab may have greater efficacy in SAEA on some outcomes.

Severe asthma and long-term Benralizumab effectiveness in real-life.

OBJECTIVE: Long-term efficacy of Benralizumab in real life is not clearly known. We assessed the long-term effectiveness persistence to anti-IL-5R treatment in a group of severe eosinophilic asthmatics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 95 individuals affected by severe asthma (36 males  ̶ 37.9%; mean age 58.1 ± 12.2) treated with Benralizumab (mean time 19.7 ± 7.2 months, range 12-35). Outcomes were evaluated at the beginning and at the end of patients' treatment periods. RESULTS: Mean baseline blood eosinophils were 897.5 ± 720.1 cells/µL (11 ± 5.6%) decreasing to 7.4 ± 20.6 cells/µL (0.97 ± 0.26%; p < 0.0001) after Benralizumab. FENO likewise decreased from 63.9 ± 68.4 to 28.4 ± 23.6 ppb, while FEV1% significantly improved (p < 0.0001). Mean FEF25-75 also increased from 45.8 ± 24.6% to 60.7 ± 24.6%, whereas RAW dropped from 202.15 ± 109.6% to 135.2 ± 54.75% (p < 0.0001). Also, lung volumes greatly decreased. ACT/ACQ significantly improved, while exacerbations number fell from 4.1 ± 2.4, before anti-IL-5R, to 0.33 ± 0.77, after treatment (p < 0.0001). Rhinitis severity levels and SNOT-22 also changed favorably. Patients that took long-term OCs were 71.6% before treatment, decreasing to 23.2% after Benralizumab (p < 0.0001), with an OCs dose reduction from 14.8 ± 8.9 to 1.45 ± 2.8 mg/day (p < 0.0001). 51.6% of subjects used SABA as needed before Benralizumab, falling to 4.2% after treatment. Several patients showed a reduction of ICS doses, SABA use and maintenance therapy step-down. Clinical/biological response with anti-IL-5R remained constant or even improved in terms of exacerbations or maintenance therapy reductions over time. On the contrary, FEF25-75% improvement slowed down in the long-term. No relationship was found between baseline blood eosinophil number and therapeutic response. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term Benralizumab effectiveness persistence in all outcomes in real life was confirmed.

Public health and clinical approach to proactive Prevalence of symptoms-based diagnosis of mild SARS-CoV-2 infection in southern Tuscany.

BACKGROUND: To date, it is unknown how many Italians have had or have a mild SARS-CoV-2 infection, because of the lack of epidemiological studies involving the general population. STUDY DESIGN: Aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence/incidence of a symptoms-based mild SARS-CoV-2 infection in southern Tuscany, by using an online survey. METHODS: An anonymous random middle-aged sample of 3,460 individuals completed the survey. A symptom-score ≥5, calculated on 195 patients with RT-PCR COVID-19 disease (sensitivity/specificity of 0.815/0.780 respectively) was used for the diagnosis. RESULTS: This cut-off highlighted that 12.3% of all the population might have had a SARS-CoV-2 infection, while 3.9% of them might have it at the time of the survey. Female sex (OR=1.334 [1.029-1.728]; p=0.030), obesity status (OR=1.961 [1.304-2.949]; p=0.001), asthma (OR=2.035 [1.433-2.890]; p=0.0001), autoim-mune diseases (OR=2.103 [1.381-3.201]; p=0.001), were all risk factors for showing mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. Instead, the elderly had a low probability to develop mild forms of the disease (OR=0.984 [0.975-0.994]; p=0.001). CONCLUSION: A remarkable number of subjects in Southern Tuscany may have already had a mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. Symptoms scores might be used to screen subjects with a suspected infection. Female sex, obesity, asthma, autoimmune diseases may be factors linked with mild forms of COVID-19 disease.

Hospitalization and mortality for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): an Italian population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with acute exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) have a significant mortality and morbidity. Previous studies have identified a number of independent prognostic factors. However, information on hospital admission databases is limited and data regarding short-term prognosis of these patients in Italian hospitals are lacking. Thus, we performed an epidemiological study on hospital admission for COPD acute exacerbation in Italy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were identified using clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Information was collected on baseline characteristics, vital status at discharge, duration of hospitalization, and up to five secondary discharge diagnoses. Comorbidity was evaluated using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). RESULTS: During the observation period (2013-2014), 170,684 patients with COPD acute exacerbation were hospitalized. Mean length of hospitalization (LOH) was 9.95±8.69 days and mean in-hospital mortality was 5.30%. These data correspond to the 4.1% of all hospitalizations and to the 2.8% of all the days of hospitalization in Italy during the study period. In-hospital mortality and LOH varied among different regions (from 3.13 to 7.59% and from 8.22 to 11.28 days respectively). Old age, male gender, low discharge volume, previous hospitalization for COPD exacerbation and CCI resulted as significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization for COPD exacerbation is extremely frequent even in contemporary Italian population. COPD exacerbation is clinically demanding with a not negligible short-term mortality rate and a mean LOH approaching 10 days. These latter findings were quite variable in different regions but should be further analyzed to set up appropriate health-care policies on COPD patients.

Should omalizumab be used in severe asthma/COPD overlap?

A large number of patients suffering from asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can show overlapping features of both diseases. Several subjects affected by asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) may be at a severe stage, poorly responsive to triple therapy including inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting ß2 agonists and muscarinic antagonists. This review tries to explore whether omalizumab can be used in poorly controlled severe ACO patients. According to the few studies available, omalizumab may improve asthma outcomes in ACO, although the magnitude of improvements may be lower in comparison to those obtained in subjects affected only by severe asthma. Omalizumab, by acting on IgE, might improve the eosinophilic pattern which is characteristic of the ACO asthma inflammation component. It can be hypothesized that a prevalence of Th1/Th17 airway inflammation pathways can modulate a lower response to anti-IgE while a Th2 pattern can lead to a higher effectiveness to omalizumab in ACO. High levels of IgE, FeNO and blood eosinophil count may be markers of a better response to omalizumab. In conclusion, on the basis of the few studies available, omalizumab could be effective in poorly-controlled severe ACO, although to a reduced extent in comparison to patients affected only by asthma.

Asthma associated to rhinitis.

A large amount of data show that AR and asthma are associated both epidemiologically and clinically, introducing the definition of “united airway disease”. The mechanisms underlying such association were initially suggested to start from the nose, including the loss of the protective and homeostatic effects of nasal function, the activation of a naso-bronchial reflex and the spread of allergic inflammation from the nose to the lower airways. Later, other factors such as microbial stimuli and systemic inflammatory mechanisms, involving bloodstream and bone marrow, were advocated. The advance in knowledge made it clear that the link between asthma and AR is multifactorial, with particular importance for inflammatory cells and especially eosinophils. By the model of nasal challenge, important immunological responses were revealed, with particular importance for the increased expression of adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and E-selectin) and of cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-13, that was accompanied by a rise of eosinophils in blood and developement of bronchial hyper-responsiveness. The occurrence in AR of a concomitant sinusitis is frequently associated with worse asthma outcomes, as assessed by a lower pulmonary function, increased asthma symptoms and poorer quality-of-life compared to patients with asthma alone.

Allergic sensitization to common pets (cats/dogs) according to different possible modalities of exposure: an Italian Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The query "are there animals at home?" is usually administered for collecting information on anamnesis. This modality to consider exposure to pet allergens constitutes a potential bias in epidemiological studies and in clinical practice. The aim of our study was to evaluate/quantify different modalities of exposure to cat/dog in inducing allergic sensitization. METHODS: Thirty Italian Allergy units participated in this study. Each centre was required to collect the data of at least 20 consecutive outpatients sensitized to cat/dog allergens. A standardized form reported all demographic data and a particular attention was paid in relieving possible modalities of exposure to cat/dog. RESULTS: A total 723 patients sensitized to cat/dog were recorded, 359 (49.65%) reported direct pet contact, 213 patients (29.46%) were pet owners, and 146 subjects (20.19%) were exposed to pets in other settings. Other patients were sensitized by previous pet ownership (150-20.75%) or indirect contact (103-14.25%), in 111 subjects (15.35%) any contact was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Only 213 patients (29.46%) would be classified as "exposed to animals" and 510 (70.54%) as "not exposed" according to usual query. Our classification has shown that many "not-exposed" subjects (399-55.19%) were "really exposed". The magnitude of exposure to pet allergens at home is not related exclusively to pet ownership. These considerations should be taken into account during the planning of epidemiological studies and in clinical practice for the management of pet allergic individuals.

Factors reducing omalizumab response in severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Despite adding Omalizumab to conventional therapy, several severe asthmatics still show poor disease control. We investigated the factors that may affect a reduced Omalizumab response in a large population of severe asthmatics. METHODS: 340 patients were retrospectively evaluated. FEV1%, FVC%, Asthma Control Test (ACT), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), possible step-downs/step-ups of concomitant therapies, exacerbations, disease control levels, ICS doses and SABA use, observed at the end of treatment, were considered as a response to Omalizumab. RESULTS: Age was an independent risk factor for a reduced response concerning FEV1%, FVC%, ACT and for a lower asthma control. Obesity (vs normal weight) was a determinant condition for exacerbations (OR:3.114[1.509-6.424], p = 0.002), for a disease partial/no control (OR:2.665[1.064-6.680], p = 0.036), for excessive SABA use (OR:4.448[1.837-10.768], p = 0.002) and for an unchanged/increased level of concomitant asthma medications. Furthermore, obesity also reduced the response in FEV1 (ß = -6.981,p = 0.04), FVC (ß = -11.689,p = 0.014) and ACT (ß = -2.585, p = 0.027) and was associated with a higher FENO level (ß = 49.045,p = 0.040). Having at least one comorbidity was a risk factor for exacerbations (OR:1.383[1.128-1.697], p = 0.008) and for an ACT <20 (OR:2.410[1.071-3.690], p = 0.008). Specifically, chronic heart disease was associated with both a lower ACT and FVC% whereas gastroesophageal reflux with a partial/no asthma control. Nasal polyps were a predisposing factor leading both to exacerbations and to the use of higher inhaled corticosteroids doses. Moreover, smoking habits, pollen or dog/cat dander co-sensitizations may negatively influence Omalizumab response. CONCLUSION: Age, obesity, comorbidities, smoking habits, nasal polyps, allergic poly-sensitization might reduce Omalizumab effectiveness independently to other asthma-influencing factors.

Could a vitamin D deficiency cause a combined long-term FEV1 and bone mineral density deterioration in female asthmatics?

OBJECTIVES: We already know that asthma is associated to osteoporosis/osteopenia and characterized by an accelerated lung function decline. Our study aimed at assessing whether lung function decline and bone mineral density (BMD) deterioration in time were associated in a group of female long-standing asthmatics. We also tried to understand whether these two aspects were related to ICS treatment and vitamin D levels. METHODS: 35 female asthmatics were retrospectively analysed. Results of methacholine challenge test at asthma onset, FEV1%, bone density scan at moment of recruitment and after at least 5years later were considered. RESULTS: A significant positive relationship between femoral-t-scores changes and FEV1 decline was found after a median follow-up time of 7 [6-9] years (r=0.43;p=0.04). Femoral-t-score variations and vitamin D values were also significantly related (r=0.669;p=0.024). Furthermore, we found that FEV1 decline was worse in subjects with lower vitamin D levels (-57.5[-80.4-35.9]ml/year), compared to those with normal vitamin D rates (12[-16-23.6]ml/year;p=0.055). Femoral/vertebral t-score changes, as well as FEV1, decline were not associated to the use of medium/high ICS doses when compared to subjects treated with low ICS dosages. CONCLUSIONS: FEV ¹ decline and BMD deterioration in time observed in a group of female asthmatics were associated; low vitamin D levels may be the link.

Different skin prick test sensitization patterns do not influence the response to Omalizumab in severe asthma

No disponible

Effects of omalizumab in severe asthmatics across ages: A real life Italian experience.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed at evaluating long-term effects of Omalizumab in elderly asthmatics in a real-life setting. METHODS: 105 consecutive severe asthmatics (GINA step 4-5; mean FEV1% predicted:66 ± 15.7) treated with Omalizumab for at least 1 year (treatment mean duration 35.1 ± 21.7 months) were divided into 3 groups according to their age at Omalizumab treatment onset: 18-39, 40-64 and ≥ 65 years. RESULTS: Comorbidities, number of overweight/obese subjects and patients with late-onset asthma were more frequent among older people. A similar reduction of inhaled corticosteroids dosage and SABA on-demand therapy was observed in all groups during Omalizumab treatment; a similar FEV1 increased was also observed. Asthma Control Test (ACT) improved significantly (p < 0.001) in the three groups, increasing from 15 [IQR:12-18] to 24 [IQR:22-25] in younger subjects, from 14 [IQR:10-16] to 21 [IQR:20-23] in the 40-64-year-group and from 15 [IQR:12-16] to 20 [IQR:18-22] in elderly patients where improvement was lower (p = 0.039) compared to younger people. Asthma exacerbations decreased significantly after Omalizumab but the percentage of exacerbation-free patients was higher in younger people (76.9%) compared to middle aged patients (49.2%) and the elderly (29%) (p = 0.049). After Omalizumab treatment, the risk for exacerbations was lower in subjects aged 40-64 (OR = 0.284 [CI95% = 0.098-0.826], p = 0.021) and 18-39 (OR = 0.133 [CI95% = 0.026-0.678], p = 0.015), compared to elderly asthmatics. Also, a significantly reduced ACT improvement (ß = -1.070; p = 0.046) passing from each age class was observed. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab improves all asthma outcomes independently of age, although the magnitude of the effects observed in the elderly seems to be lower than in the other age groups.

Can we modulate asthma maintenance treatment level with disease seasonal variations?

Asthma can have clinical seasonal fluctuations due to different exposure factors. The analysis of our data and literature confirm a seasonal trend of asthma severity. In this brief review, authors discuss the possibility to adapt maintenance therapy level to clinical seasonal fluctuations, by increasing treatment in some seasons to prevent exacerbations and by decreasing it in others, when symptoms are low, in order to minimize costs and maximize safety. Literature and our data (concerning studies carried out in areas with a temperate climate) indicate that asthma severity is reduced in summer while it tends to increase in the other seasons. Authors conclude that a preventive increasing maintenance treatment level during the season when we know that patients worsen (starting some weeks before symptom worsening) may reduce asthma exacerbation risks. On the contrary, a summer treatment reduction, in patients that improve during this period, may be considered only in asthma phenotypes with a benign disease course in time.

Asthma control in elderly asthmatics. An Italian observational study.

BACKGROUND: The exponential increase of individuals aged >64 yrs is expected to impact the burden of asthma. We aimed to explore the level of asthma control in elderly subjects, and factors influencing it. METHODS: A multicenter observational study was performed on consecutive patients >64 years old with a documented physician-diagnosis of asthma. Sixteen Italian centers were involved in this 6-month project. FINDINGS: A total of 350 patients were enrolled in the study. More than one-third of elderly asthmatic patients, despite receiving GINA step 3-4 antiasthmatic therapy, had an Asthma Control Test score ≤19, with a quarter experiencing at least one severe asthma exacerbation in the previous year. Twenty-nine percent of patients (n = 101) were classified as having Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome (ACOS) due to the presence of chronic bronchitis and/or CO lung diffusion impairment. This subgroup of patients had lower mean Asthma Control Test scores and more exacerbations compared to the asthmatic patients (18 ± 4 compared to 20 ± 4, p < 0.01, and 43% compared to 18%, p < 0.01, respectively). Modified Medical Research Council dyspnea mMRC scores and airway obstruction, assessed on the basis of a FEV(1)/FVC ratio below the lower limit of normal, were more severe in ACOS than in asthma, without any difference in responses to salbutamol. In a multivariate analysis, the mMRC dyspnea score, FEV(1)% of predicted and the coexistence of COPD were the only variables to enter the model. INTERPRETATION: Our results highlight the need to specifically evaluate the coexistence of features of COPD in elderly asthmatics, a factor that worsens asthma control.

Cypress pollen: an unexpected major sensitizing agent in different regions of Italy.

OBJECTIVES: In this multicenter survey, we assessed the impact of sensitization to cypress in atopic patients in Italy and determined whether cypress pollen concentration changed over time. METHODS: Allergists were required to collect the results of 100-200 consecutive skin prick tests (SPTs) performed during 2012. Seasonal symptoms were also recorded, as were airborne cypress pollen concentrations (data from the Italian Aerobiology Association) in 1998-2000 and 2010-2012. RESULTS: We examined 2258 atopic outpatients (56% females; age, 2-84 years) sensitized to at least 1 of the aeroallergens tested (Dermatophagoides species, grass, pellitory, olive, cypress, birch, Alternaria tenuis, and dog and cat dander). We found that 62.9%, 16.1%, and 32.7% of patients living in central, northern, and southern Italy, respectively, were sensitized to cypress (P < .0001). The cypress pollen concentration peak was delayed from February to March in 1998-2000 and 2010-2012 in all 3 regions, with a shift in pollination towards spring. Patients who were monosensitized to cypress reported mainly rhinitis (90.7%-97.6%) and conjunctivitis (38.1%-100%). In polysensitized patients, the prevalence of rhinitis, conjunctivitis, and asthma increased progressively (P < .0001) from southern to northern Italy. The same trend was observed for the prevalence of reported winter symptoms typical of cypress allergy (28%-65%). CONCLUSIONS: Today, cypress pollen is the most frequent sensitizing aeroallergen (assessed by SPT) in several areas of central Italy. Variations in the timing of the cypress pollination period may have favored this increased sensitization. Rhinitis and conjunctivitis are the predominant symptoms. The clinical impact of this allergy was poor in southern Italy and increased in central areas before reaching its peak in northern regions.

Cypress pollen: an unexpected major sensitizing agent in different regions of Italy

Objectives: In this multicenter survey, we assessed the impact of sensitization to cypress in atopic patients in Italy and determined whether cypress pollen concentration changed over time. Methods: Allergists were required to collect the results of 100-200 consecutive skin prick tests (SPTs) performed during 2012. Seasonal symptoms were also recorded, as were airborne cypress pollen concentrations (data from the Italian Aerobiology Association) in 1998- 2000 and 2010-2012. Results: We examined 2258 atopic outpatients (56% females; age, 2-84 years) sensitized to at least 1 of the aeroallergens tested (Dermatophagoides species, grass, pellitory, olive, cypress, birch, Alternaria tenuis, and dog and cat dander). We found that 62.9%, 16.1%, and 32.7% of patients living in central, northern, and southern Italy, respectively, were sensitized to cypress (P<.0001). The cypress pollen concentration peak was delayed from February to March in 1998-2000 and 2010-2012 in all 3 regions, with a shift in pollination towards spring. Patients who were monosensitized to cypress reported mainly rhinitis (90.7%-97.6%) and conjunctivitis (38.1%-100%). In polysensitized patients, the prevalence of rhinitis, conjunctivitis, and asthma increased progressively (P<.0001) from southern to northern Italy. The same trend was observed for the prevalence of reported winter symptoms typical of cypress allergy (28%-65%). Conclusions: Today, cypress pollen is the most frequent sensitizing aeroallergen (assessed by SPT) in several areas of central Italy. Variations in the timing of the cypress pollination period may have favored this increased sensitization. Rhinitis and conjunctivitis are the predominant symptoms. The clinical impact of this allergy was poor in southern Italy and increased in central areas before reaching its peak in northern regions (AU)

Antecedentes: Se trata de una encuesta multicéntrica realizada en Italia para evaluar el impacto de la sensibilización a polen de ciprés en sujetos atópicos y establecer si la concentración de este polen en el aire ha cambiado a lo largo del tiempo. Métodos: El estudio fue realizado por alergólogos que recopilaron 100-200 sujetos consecutivos con pruebas cutáneas positivas (Prick) realizadas en 2012. Se recogieron los síntomas estacionales, junto con la concentración de polen de ciprés (obtenida por la asociación italiana de aerobiología) en 1998-2000 y 2010-2012. Resultados: En cuanto a los resultados obtenidos fueron examinados 2258 pacientes atópicos (56% mujeres; edad 2-84), sensibilizados frente al menos uno de los aeroalérgenos testados (Dermatophagoides, gramíneas, parietaria, olivo, cipres, abedul, Alternaria tenuis y epitelio de gato). El 62.9%, 16.1% y 32.7% de los pacientes que vivían en el centro, norte y sur de Italia, respectivamente, mostraron sensibilización a polen de ciprés (p<0.0001). Observamos un pico de concentración de polen de ciprés de febrero a marzo en los años 1998-2000 y 2010-2012, en todas las áreas. Los pacientes monosensibilizados a ciprés mostraron de forma prevalente rinitis (90.7-97.6%) y conjuntivitis (38.1-100%). La prevalencia de rinitis, conjuntivitis y asma se incrementa progresivamente (p<0.0001) del sur hacia el norte de Italia en los sujetos polisensibilizados. La misma tendencia se observó en los síntomas invernales típicos de la alergia al ciprés. Conclusiones: En conclusión, actualmente el polen de ciprés es el aeroalérgeno sensibilizante más frecuente (según resultados de prueba cutánea) en varias áreas de Italia central. Las variaciones del periodo de polinización pueden favorecer el incremento observado en la sensibilización a este polen. Los síntomas predominantes son rinitis y conjuntivitis. El impacto clínico de esta alergia es pobre en áreas del sur de Italia, siendo alto en las áreas del norte (AU)

Efficacy and cost effectiveness of rapid on site examination (ROSE) in management of patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathies.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic and staging approach for the mediastinal lymphadenopathies, with or whithout pulmonary lesions endoscopically visible, is based on transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) during fiberoptic bronchoscopy and on mediastinoscopy. One important factor impacting on TBNA sensitivity is the rapid on site cytological examination (ROSE). AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the economic impact of TBNA and TBNA + ROSE, in the diagnosis of these lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 120 patients, affected by mediastinal lymphadenopathies suspected for lung cancer, underwent TBNA during fiberoptic bronchoscopy: 60 patients without ROSE (group A) and other 60 with ROSE (group B). Whenever needle aspirations failed to provide diagnosis, the patient underwent mediastinoscopy. The economic impact of the diagnostic process was performed. RESULTS: In group A, 39 patients (65%) obtained a diagnosis with TBNA while 21 patients (35%) required mediastinoscopy. In group B, 48 patients (80%) obtained a diagnosis with TBNA + ROSE, while 12 patients (20%) required mediastinoscopy. With regards to the costs of the procedures performed in the diagnostic process, the use of TBNA with ROSE as first diagnostic approach has saved a considerable amount of euros (19,413) compared to the use of TBNA without ROSE and the combined procedure increased (p < 0.02; chi square test) the sensitivity of TBNA by 15%. CONCLUSIONS: ROSE significantly impacts on the diagnostic yield, as well as on the overall management costs of patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy, suspected for lung cancer.