Patient, hospital and environmental costs of unnecessary bloodwork: capturing the triple bottom line of inappropriate care in general surgery patients.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise the extent of unnecessary care in general surgery inpatients using a triple bottom line approach. DESIGN: Patients with uncomplicated acute surgical conditions were retrospectively evaluated for unnecessary bloodwork according to the triple bottom line, quantifying the impacts on patients, healthcare costs and greenhouse gas emissions. The carbon footprint of common laboratory investigations was estimated using PAS2050 methodology, including emissions generated from the production, transport, processing and disposal of consumable goods and reagents. SETTING: Single-centre tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, gallstone pancreatitis and adhesive small bowel obstruction were included in the study. 304 patients met inclusion criteria and 83 were randomly selected for in-depth chart review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In each patient population, the extent of over-investigation was determined by comparing ordered laboratory investigations against previously developed consensus recommendations. The quantity of unnecessary bloodwork was measured by number of phlebotomies, tests and blood volume in addition to healthcare costs and greenhouse gas emissions. RESULTS: 76% (63/83) of evaluated patients underwent unnecessary bloodwork resulting in a mean of 1.84 phlebotomies, 4.4 blood vials, 16.5 tests and 18 mL of blood loss per patient. The hospital and environmental cost of these unnecessary activities was $C5235 and 61 kg CO2e (974 g CO2e per person), respectively. The carbon footprint of a common set of investigations (complete blood count, differential, creatinine, urea, sodium, potassium) was 332 g CO2e. Adding a liver panel (liver enzymes, bilirubin, albumin, international normalised ratio/partial thromboplastin time) resulted in an additional 462 g CO2e. CONCLUSIONS: We found considerable overuse of laboratory investigations among general surgery patients admitted with uncomplicated acute surgical conditions resulting in unnecessary burden to patients, hospitals and the environment. This study identifies an opportunity for resource stewardship and exemplifies a comprehensive approach to quality improvement.

Online Cleft Educational Videos: Parent Preferences.

OBJECTIVE: Determine what parents of children with cleft lip and palate value in online educational videos and evaluate whether their needs are currently being met. DESIGN: Focus groups and telephone interviews were used to define parent information needs, followed by an evaluation of whether currently available YouTube videos meet these needs. SETTING: British Columbia Children's Hospital multidisciplinary cleft clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four parents of children with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate. RESULTS: Parents desired videos that are accessible, trustworthy, relatable, and positive. Parents preferred a series of short videos addressing relevant topics as their child grows. Currently available YouTube videos only partially met these needs, with underrepresented topics including hearing, dentition, and surgeries for older children. CONCLUSIONS: While access and validity of video resources can be improved by directing patients and families to appropriate videos, some parent needs remain unmet.