From patchwork to package: implementing foundational capabilities for state and local health departments.

Daily public health responses are threatened by the inadequate capacity of public health agencies. A 2012 Institute of Medicine report defined a package of foundational capabilities that support all programs and services within a health department. Standardizing foundational capabilities may help address the increasing disparity in health department performance nationally. During the Fall of 2013, we collected information on how much state and local health departments knew about foundational capabilities. To our knowledge, this was the first study to assess current health department infrastructure as it relates to foundational capabilities.

Practitioner perspectives on foundational capabilities.

CONTEXT: National efforts are underway to classify a minimum set of public health services that all jurisdictions throughout the United States should provide regardless of location. Such a set of basic programs would be supported by crosscutting services, known as the "foundational capabilities" (FCs). These FCs are assessment services, preparedness and disaster response, policy development, communications, community partnership, and organizational support activities. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain familiarity with the term and concept of FCs and gather related perspectives from state and local public health practitioners. DESIGN: In fall 2013, we interviewed 50 leaders from state and local health departments. We asked about familiarity with the term "foundational capabilities," as well as the broader concept of FCs. We attempted to triangulate the utility of the FC concept by asking respondents about priority programs and services, about perceived unique contributions made by public health, and about prevalence and funding for the FCs. SETTING: Telephone-based interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty leaders of state and local health departments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Practitioner familiarity with and perspectives on the FCs, information about current funding streams for public health, and the likelihood of creating nationwide FCs that would be recognized and accepted by all jurisdictions. RESULTS: Slightly more than half of the leaders interviewed said that they were familiar with the concept of FCs. In most cases, health departments had all of the capabilities to some degree, although operationalization varied. Few indicated that current funding levels were sufficient to support implementing a minimum level of FCs nationally. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents were not able to articulate the current or optimal levels of services for the various capabilities, nor the costs associated with them. Further research is needed to understand the role of FCs as part of the foundational public health services.

Health spending and political influence: the case of earmarks and health care facilities.

Earmarks, otherwise known as Congressionally directed spending requests, are a historically significant means of political influence over budgets. In this brief, we report on the results of a longitudinal study of federal earmarks affecting health care facilities and public health. We analyzed 10 years of earmark for health care facilities and examined the correlates of being in the top 50% of earmark recipients for each year. Having representatives or senators serving on the respective Appropriations committees were shown to have increased odds of being a top earmark recipient, as was being in jurisdictions with greater poverty. However, health-related measures of need were not significantly associated with being a top earmark recipient.

Changes in public health workforce composition: proportion of part-time workforce and its correlates, 2008-2013.

BACKGROUND: State and local public health department infrastructure in the U.S. was impacted by the 2008 economic recession. The nature and impact of these staffing changes have not been well characterized, especially for the part-time public health workforce. PURPOSE: To estimate the number of part-time workers in state and local health departments (LHDs) and examine the correlates of change in the part-time LHD workforce between 2008 and 2013. METHODS: We used workforce data from the 2008 and 2013 National Association of County and City Health Officials (n=1,543) and Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (n=24) profiles. We employed a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the possible and plausible proportion of the workforce that was part-time, over various assumptions. Next, we employed a multinomial regression assessing correlates of the change in staffing composition among LHDs, including jurisdiction and organizational characteristics, as well measures of community involvement. RESULTS: Nationally representative estimates suggest that the local public health workforce decreased from 191,000 to 168,000 between 2008 and 2013. During that period, the part-time workforce decreased from 25% to 20% of those totals. At the state level, part-time workers accounted for less than 10% of the total workforce among responding states in 2013. Smaller and multi-county jurisdictions employed relatively more part-time workers. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to create national estimates regarding the size of the part-time public health workforce and estimate those changes over time. A relatively small proportion of the public health workforce is part-time and may be decreasing.

Thinking beyond the silos: emerging priorities in workforce development for state and local government public health agencies.

CONTEXT: Discipline-specific workforce development initiatives have been a focus in recent years. This is due, in part, to competency-based training standards and funding sources that reinforce programmatic silos within state and local health departments. OBJECTIVE: National leadership groups representing the specific disciplines within public health were asked to look beyond their discipline-specific priorities and collectively assess the priorities, needs, and characteristics of the governmental public health workforce. DESIGN: The challenges and opportunities facing the public health workforce and crosscutting priority training needs of the public health workforce as a whole were evaluated. Key informant interviews were conducted with 31 representatives from public health member organizations and federal agencies. Interviews were coded and analyzed for major themes. Next, 10 content briefs were created on the basis of priority areas within workforce development. Finally, an in-person priority setting meeting was held to identify top workforce development needs and priorities across all disciplines within public health. PARTICIPANTS: Representatives from 31 of 37 invited public health organizations participated, including representatives from discipline-specific member organizations, from national organizations and from federal agencies. RESULTS: Systems thinking, communicating persuasively, change management, information and analytics, problem solving, and working with diverse populations were the major crosscutting areas prioritized. CONCLUSIONS: Decades of categorical funding created a highly specialized and knowledgeable workforce that lacks many of the foundational skills now most in demand. The balance between core and specialty training should be reconsidered.

Possible association of congenital Brown syndrome with congenital cranial dysinnervation disorders.

BACKGROUND: Congenital cranial dysinnervation disorders (CCDDs) are known to arise from abnormal development of individual and multiple cranial nerve nuclei or abnormalities in cranial nerve axonal transport. We report our findings for several patients with Brown syndrome in association with other known abnormalities characteristic of CCDDs. METHODS: The medical records of patients presenting during a 4-year period with congenital Brown syndrome were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with Brown syndrome confirmed by forced ductions were included in the study if the Brown syndrome was associated with either an abnormal development of the superior oblique muscle or superior oblique paresis, ptosis, Duane syndrome, or other known CCDDs. RESULTS: A total of 9 patients with Brown syndrome were identified. Of these, 3 also demonstrated a contralateral superior oblique palsy; 2, a contralateral Duane syndrome; 1, an ipsilateral congenital ptosis; and 3, a moderate to severely hypoplastic ipsilateral superior oblique muscle. CONCLUSIONS: Some patients with congenital Brown syndrome are associated with and possibly in the spectrum of CCDDs. We propose that Brown syndrome may be due to abnormal development of the trochlear nerve, which results in physical changes in the superior oblique muscle-tendon-trochlea complex. This results in a tendon that is either long and lax, absent, or abnormally inserted (ie, superior oblique paresis) or a tendon that is restricted in its movements through the trochlea (Brown syndrome).