ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Scientific data on the image modality to be used in postcurative treatment surveillance of non-small cell lung cancer patients are scarce. This prospective randomized pilot trial compared the performance of integrated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT). METHODS: After termination of curative-intent treatment, patients were randomly assigned to the PET-CT or the CE-CT group. Imaging was performed every 6 months for 2 years. If suspicious radiologic findings were detected or patients became symptomatic, a diagnostic workup was initiated. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for detecting cancer recurrence were calculated for both imaging procedures. RESULTS: The study enrolled 96 patients. In 14 of 50 patients (28%) in the PET-CT group and in 14 of 46 patients (30%) in the CE-CT group, a suspicious radiologic finding was confirmed as cancer recurrence after diagnostic workup. False-positive findings were detected in 11 patients (22%) of the PET-CT group and in 8 patients (17%) of the CE-CT group. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for detecting cancer recurrence (95% confidence interval) were 0.88 (0.62 to 0.98), 0.62 (0.42 to 0.79), and 0.56 (0.35 to 0.76) for PET-CT and 0.93 (0.68 to 1.00), 0.72 (0.53 to 0.87), and 0.64 (0.41to 0.83) for CE-CT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that PET-CT is not superior to CE-CT in detecting cancer recurrence during 2 years after curative-intent treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18/pharmacology , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Pilot Projects , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Radiopharmaceuticals/pharmacology , Reproducibility of Results , Switzerland/epidemiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Prospective evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of single field-of-view contrast-enhanced MR Angiography (ceMRA) with 1.0M gadobutrol compared to intraarterial DSA in body arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an European multicenter study 179 patients underwent ceMRA and DSA. For each indication five prospectively defined vessel segments were evaluated by local investigators onsite and by three site-independent blinded readers (BR) independently. RESULTS: The agreement between ceMRA and DSA diagnosis was statistically significant in the onsite (96.6%) and blinded reader (86.6-90.2%) evaluation. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) for detection of relevant stenosis (>50%) were calculated for the right and left internal carotid arteries, and common and external iliac arteries: Sensitivity was 95-98% (onsite) and 76-96% (BR), specificity 94-96% (onsite) and 86-94% (BR), accuracy 96% (onsite) and 87-93% (BR), NPV 98-99% (onsite) and 84-98% (BR), and PPV 79-93% (onsite) and 44-91% (BR), respectively. CONCLUSION: CeMRA of body arteries using 1.0M gadobutrol provides diagnostic information comparable to intraarterial DSA.
