In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design.

Up to 20% of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are not satisfied with the result. Several designs of new implants try to rebuild natural knee kinematics. We hypothesized that an innovative implant design leads to better results concerning femoral rollback compared to an established implant design. For this pilot study, 21 patients were examined during TKA, receiving either an innovative (ATTUNETM Knee System (DePuy Inc.), n = 10) or an established (PFCTM (DePuy Inc.), n = 11) knee system. All patients underwent computer navigation. Knee kinematics was assessed after implantation. Outcome measure was anterior-posterior translation between femur and tibia. We were able to demonstrate a significantly higher femoral rollback in the innovative implant group (p < 0.001). The mean rollback of the innovative system was 11.00 mm (95%-confidence interval [CI], 10.77-11.24), of the established system 8.12 mm (95%-CI, 7.84-8.42). This study revealed a significantly increased lateral as well as medial femoral rollback of knees with the innovative prosthesis design. Our intraoperative finding needs to be confirmed using fluoroscopic or radiographic three-dimensional matching under full-weight-bearing conditions after complete recovery from surgery.

Soft tissue restricts impingement-free mobility in total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Impingement is a major source for decreased range of motion (ROM) and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the current study we analyzed the impact of soft tissue impingement on ROM compared to bony and/or prosthetic impingement. METHODS: In the course of a prospective clinical trial 54 patients underwent cementless total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position using imageless navigation. The navigation device enabled intra-operative ROM measurements indicating soft tissue impingement. Post-operatively, all patients received postoperative 3D-CT. Absolute ROM without bony and/or prosthetic impingement was calculated with the help of a collision-detection-algorithm. RESULTS: Due to soft tissue impingement we found a reduced ROM of over 20° (p < 0.001) compared to bony and/or prosthetic impingement regarding flexion, extension, abduction and adduction and of over 10° regarding external rotation (p < 0.001). In contrast, soft tissue impingement showed less impact on internal rotation in 90° of flexion (p = 0.76). Multivariate analysis showed an association between BMI and flexion, whereas all other ROM directions were independent of BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Soft tissue has a major impact on impingement-free ROM after THA. For the majority of movements, soft tissue restrictions are more important than bony and prosthetic impingement. Future models of patient individual joint replacement including pre-operative (CT) planning and intra-operative navigation should include algorithms additionally accounting for soft tissue impingement.

Visual intraoperative estimation of range of motion is misleading in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Generally range of motion (ROM) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is intraoperatively assessed by eye. Can we assume that visual estimation of ROM is reliable? METHODS: 60 patients underwent cementless THA in a subgroup analysis of a clinical prospective trial using a minimally invasive anterolateral approach in lateral decubitus position. Four experienced surgeons intraoperatively estimated ROM visually by assessment of the femur relative to the alignment of the patient's pelvis. These estimations were compared with computer navigation measurements. RESULTS: We found a mean difference between navigation measurements and intraoperative estimations by eye of -5.6° (±10.9°; -17° to 30°) for flexion, respectively, -0.4° (±10.7°; -24° to 30°) for extension, 8.7° (±9.0°; -10° to 34°) for abduction, 5.9° (±18.3°; -58° to 68°) for external rotation and -5.8° (±12.1°; -38° to 22°) for internal rotation. Multivariate analysis showed no association between the visual accuracy of estimation of ROM and patient characteristics, such as BMI, sex, grade of osteoarthritis and treatment side except for a significant correlation of visual accuracy of estimation of extension and the level of professional experience. Otherwise, the level of professional experience had no impact on the accuracy of estimation of ROM by eye. CONCLUSIONS: Even the experienced surgeon's intraoperative estimation of ROM by eye is not reliable and differs up to 30° compared to objective measurements in minimally invasive THA. For accurate intraoperative assessment of ROM, the use of technical devices is recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00000739.

Visual intraoperative estimation of cup and stem position is not reliable in minimally invasive hip arthroplasty.

Background and purpose - In hip arthroplasty, acetabular inclination and anteversion-and also femoral stem torsion-are generally assessed by eye intraoperatively. We assessed whether visual estimation of cup and stem position is reliable. Patients and methods - In the course of a subgroup analysis of a prospective clinical trial, 65 patients underwent cementless hip arthroplasty using a minimally invasive anterolateral approach in lateral decubitus position. Altogether, 4 experienced surgeons assessed cup position intraoperatively according to the operative definition by Murray in the anterior pelvic plane and stem torsion in relation to the femoral condylar plane. Inclination, anteversion, and stem torsion were measured blind postoperatively on 3D-CT and compared to intraoperative results. Results - The mean difference between the 3D-CT results and intraoperative estimations by eye was -4.9° (-18 to 8.7) for inclination, 9.7° (-16 to 41) for anteversion, and -7.3° (-34 to 15) for stem torsion. We found an overestimation of > 5° for cup inclination in 32 hips, an overestimation of > 5° for stem torsion in 40 hips, and an underestimation < 5° for cup anteversion in 42 hips. The level of professional experience and patient characteristics had no clinically relevant effect on the accuracy of estimation by eye. Altogether, 46 stems were located outside the native norm of 10-20° as defined by Tönnis, measured on 3D-CT. Interpretation - Even an experienced surgeon's intraoperative estimation of cup and stem position by eye is not reliable compared to 3D-CT in minimally invasive THA. The use of mechanical insertion jigs, intraoperative fluoroscopy, or imageless navigation is recommended for correct implant insertion.

Fluoroscopy and imageless navigation enable an equivalent reconstruction of leg length and global and femoral offset in THA.

BACKGROUND: Restoration of biomechanics is a major goal in THA. Imageless navigation enables intraoperative control of leg length equalization and offset reconstruction. However, the effect of navigation compared with intraoperative fluoroscopy is unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether intraoperative use of imageless navigation (1) improves the relative accuracy of leg length and global and femoral offset restoration; (2) increases the absolute precision of leg length and global and femoral offset equalization; and (3) reduces outliers in a reconstruction zone of ± 5 mm for leg length and global and femoral offset restoration compared with intraoperative fluoroscopy during minimally invasive (MIS) THA with the patient in a lateral decubitus position. METHODS: In this prospective study a consecutive series of 125 patients were randomized to either navigation-guided or fluoroscopy-controlled THA using sealed, opaque envelopes. All patients received the same cementless prosthetic components through an anterolateral MIS approach while they were in a lateral decubitus position. Leg length, global or total offset (representing the combination of femoral and acetabular offset), and femoral offset differences were restored using either navigation or fluoroscopy. Postoperatively, residual leg length and global and femoral offset discrepancies were analyzed on magnification-corrected radiographs of the pelvis by an independent and blinded examiner using digital planning software. Accuracy was defined as the relative postoperative difference between the surgically treated and the unaffected contralateral side for leg length and offset, respectively; precision was defined as the absolute postoperative deviation of leg length and global and femoral offset regardless of lengthening or shortening of leg length and offset throughout the THA. All analyses were performed per intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Analyzing the relative accuracy of leg length restoration we found a mean difference of 0.2 mm (95% CI, -1.0 to +1.4 mm; p = 0.729) between fluoroscopy and navigation, 0.2 mm (95 % CI, -0.9 to +1.3 mm; p = 0.740) for global offset and 1.7 mm (95 % CI, +0.4 to +2.9 mm; p = 0.008) for femoral offset. For the absolute precision of leg length and global and femoral offset equalization, there was a mean difference of 1.7 ± 0.3 mm (p < 0.001) between fluoroscopy and navigation. The biomechanical reconstruction with a residual leg length and global and femoral offset discrepancy less than 5 mm and less than 8 mm, respectively, succeeded in 93% and 98%, respectively, in the navigation group and in 54% and 95%, respectively, in the fluoroscopy group. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative fluoroscopy and imageless navigation seem equivalent in accuracy and precision to reconstruct leg length and global and femoral offset during MIS THA with the patient in the lateral decubitus position.

Improved kinematics of total knee replacement following partially navigated modified gap-balancing technique.

PURPOSE: Navigation-based total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has proven its value for restoration of the limb axis. However, patient-orientated results after TKA show a wide variation from the correct implantation technique. Nonphysiological kinematics without posterior femoral rollback and tibial internal rotation in flexion could be one reason for this. We postulated that a modified gap-balancing technique with navigation of the tibia alone, in comparison to a conventional navigated technique, would: (1) obtain lateral femoral rollback, (2) alter condylar liftoff without midflexion instability, (3) significantly differ in femoral and tibial cuts, (4) not be inferior in leg-axis restoration and (5) be comparable in clinical short-term scores. METHODS: In this prospective study, we compared in vivo navigation-based kinematics pre- and postoperatively of 40 consecutive TKA comprising 21 conventional navigation-based TKA and 19 TKA with the modified gap-balancing technique and a reduced navigation workflow. All cuts were double checked and compared with cuts proposed by the navigation system. Clinical results were assessed preoperatively and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: The modified gap-balancing technique resulted in significantly increased lateral femoral rollback (mean 16.3 mm) and lateral condylar liftoff (mean 1.3 mm) compared to the conventional group. The modified technique comprised an average of 2.1 mm less distal femoral resection and an average of 4° less external rotation and 3.5° more flexion of the femoral component compared with the control group. Average tibial resection height was 1.1 mm greater and average tibial slope was 0.5° elevated compared to the control group. A neutral leg axis was achieved in all cases. Results showed no significant differences in clinical scores between groups. CONCLUSION: A partial navigation solely of the tibial cut can securely restore the leg axis. Modification of the surgical technique can possibly reproduce more physiological knee kinematics with higher lateral femoral rollback in flexion without midflexion instability. This might help reduce postoperative problems with the new implant and thus reduce the amount of unsatisfactory results. Despite equal short-term results, mid- to long-term results are needed to prove whether or not this correlates with better clinical results and at least equal implant longevity.

Minimally invasive computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty, following the concept of femur first and combined anteversion: design of a blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Impingement can be a serious complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and is one of the major causes of postoperative pain, dislocation, aseptic loosening, and implant breakage. Minimally invasive THA and computer-navigated surgery were introduced several years ago. We have developed a novel, computer-assisted operation method for THA following the concept of "femur first"/"combined anteversion", which incorporates various aspects of performing a functional optimization of the cup position, and comprehensively addresses range of motion (ROM) as well as cup containment and alignment parameters. Hence, the purpose of this study is to assess whether the artificial joint's ROM can be improved by this computer-assisted operation method. Second, the clinical and radiological outcome will be evaluated. METHODS/DESIGN: A registered patient- and observer-blinded randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Patients between the ages of 50 and 75 admitted for primary unilateral THA will be included. Patients will be randomly allocated to either receive minimally invasive computer-navigated "femur first" THA or the conventional minimally invasive THA procedure. Self-reported functional status and health-related quality of life (questionnaires) will be assessed both preoperatively and postoperatively. Perioperative complications will be registered. Radiographic evaluation will take place up to 6 weeks postoperatively with a computed tomography (CT) scan. Component position will be evaluated by an independent external institute on a 3D reconstruction of the femur/pelvis using image-processing software. Postoperative ROM will be calculated by an algorithm which automatically determines bony and prosthetic impingements. DISCUSSION: In the past, computer navigation has improved the accuracy of component positioning. So far, there are only few objective data quantifying the risks and benefits of computer navigated THA. Therefore, this study has been designed to compare minimally invasive computer-navigated "femur first" THA with a conventional technique for minimally invasive THA. The results of this trial will be presented as soon as they become available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00000739.