Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol ; 289(3): R784-8, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15860652

ABSTRACT

Presenting a 15-s pulsed tone, the conditional stimulus (CS(+)), followed by 0.5-s tail shock, to a well-trained rat causes a sudden, but transient, pressor response (C(1)). Blood pressure (BP) then drops before increasing again (C(2)). A steady tone of the same frequency never followed by a shock (a discriminative stimulus, or CS(-)) evokes a C(1) but not a C(2) response. Experiment 1 tested the hypothesis that this BP response pattern does not depend on the nature of the tone (i.e., pulsed vs. steady) used for CS(+) and CS(-). The tones were reversed from the traditional paradigm, above, in nine rats. The C(1) BP increase for a steady-tone CS(+) (+4.8 +/- 1.9 mmHg, mean change +/- SE) and a pulsed CS(-) (+2.9 +/- 1.3 mmHg) did not differ. Conversely, C(2) showed a clear discrimination (CS(+): +5.1 +/- 1.2 mmHg, CS(-): +0 .7 +/- 0.8 mmHg; P < 0.05). Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that the C(1) and C(2) BP responses first appear at different times during training. On training day 1, five 15-s pulsed tones (CS(+)) were presented to each of 18 rats; the last tone was followed by a tail shock. Likewise, five steady CS(-) tones never followed by shock were given. Training continued for 2 more days, with each CS(+) followed by shock. At the end of day 2, CS(+) evoked a C(1) BP response (+3.9 +/- 0.9 mmHg) but no C(2) (+0.6 +/- 0.4 mmHg, not significant vs. pretone). By the end of day 3, CS(+) evoked a significant (vs. baseline) C(1) (+7.3 +/- 1.4 mmHg) and C(2) (+3.3 +/- 0.8 mmHg). Conversely, although CS(-) evoked a C(1) response (3.5 +/- 1.3 mmHg), there was no C(2) (+0.7 +/- 0.5 mmHg; not significant). We conclude that 1) C(1) and C(2) are acquired at different rates, 2) early in training C(1) is an orienting response evoked by both tones, and 3) C(2) is only acquired as an animal learns to associate the CS(+) tone with shock. This suggests that C(1) and C(2) are controlled by different processes in the brain.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure/physiology , Conditioning, Classical/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Animals , Electroshock , Heart Rate/physiology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
2.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol ; 284(5): H1793-9, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12521936

ABSTRACT

We examined the effects of chronic nicotine exposure and dietary salt on the arterial blood pressure (BP) changes learned in response to an acute behavioral stress in the Dahl salt-sensitive rat. Four groups were tested: low salt + vehicle; low salt + nicotine; high salt + vehicle; and high salt + nicotine. Rats were fed a low-salt (0.08% NaCl) or a high-salt (8% NaCl) diet for 4 wk; 2.4 mg. kg(-1). day(-1) nicotine or vehicle was given via an implanted osmotic minipump for the last 2 wk. All rats were conditioned by following one tone (CS+) with a 0.5-s tail shock; another tone (CS-) was never followed by shock. CS+ in low salt + vehicle and high salt + vehicle-treated rats evoked an initial arterial BP increase (C(1)), a component of the startle response, and an ensuing, smaller, but more sustained, pressor response (C(2)), which is acquired with training. In these rats, both C(1) and C(2) evoked by CS- were significantly smaller than those to CS+, demonstrating that these groups discriminated between the two tests. Conversely, although the low salt + nicotine-treated rats had both the C(1) and C(2) components of the conditional arterial pressure response, they did not discriminate between CS+ and CS-. Finally, the high salt + nicotine group failed to both discriminate between tones and acquire (i.e., learn) the C(2) response. The unconditional response to shock did not differ between groups. We conclude that combined exposure to high salt and to nicotine inhibits the salt-sensitive animal's acquisition of a learned conditional BP response, perhaps because nicotine acts preferentially on those central processes required for associative learning versus those involved in orientating to external stimuli.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure/drug effects , Hypertension/physiopathology , Nicotine/pharmacology , Nicotinic Agonists/pharmacology , Sodium Chloride, Dietary/pharmacology , Animals , Autonomic Nervous System/drug effects , Conditioning, Classical/drug effects , Hypertension/chemically induced , Rats , Rats, Inbred Dahl , Smoking
3.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol ; 283(3): R748-56, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12185010

ABSTRACT

This experiment quantified the initial disruption and subsequent adaptation of the blood pressure (BP)-heart rate (HR) relationship after spinal cord transection (SCT). BP and HR were recorded for 4 h via an implanted catheter in neurally intact, unanesthetized rats. The animals were then anesthetized, and their spinal cords were severed at T(1)-T(2) (n = 5) or T(4)-T(5) (n = 6) or sham lesioned (n = 4). BP was recorded for 4 h daily over the ensuing 6 days. The neurally intact rat showed a positive cross correlation, with HR leading BP at the peak by 1.8 +/- 0.8 (SD) s. The cross correlation in unanesthetized rats (n = 2) under neuromuscular blockade was also positive, with HR leading. After SCT at T(1)-T(2), the cross correlation became negative, with BP leading HR, and did not change during the next 6 days. The cross correlation also became negative 1-3 days after SCT at T(4)-T(5), but in four rats by day 6 and thereafter the cross correlation progressively reverted to a positive value. We propose that the positive cross correlation with HR leading BP in the intact rat results from an open-loop control that depends on intact supraspinal input to sympathetic preganglionic neurons in the spinal cord. After descending sympathetic pathways were severed at T(1)-T(2), the intact vagal pathway to the sinoatrial node dominated BP regulation via the baroreflex. We suggest that reestablishment of the positive correlation after SCT at T(4)-T(5) was attributable to the surviving sympathetic outflow to the heart and upper vasculature reasserting some effective function, perhaps in association with decreased spinal sympathetic hyperreflexia. The HR-BP cross correlation may index progression of sympathetic dysfunction in pathological processes.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure/physiology , Heart Rate/physiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Animals , Baroreflex/physiology , Consciousness , Parasympathetic Nervous System/physiology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Sympathetic Nervous System/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL