Central Artery Hemodynamics in Angiotensin II-Induced Hypertension and Effects of Anesthesia.

Systemic hypertension is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular, neurovascular, and renovascular diseases. Central artery stiffness is both an initiator and indicator of hypertension, thus revealing a critical relationship between the wall mechanics and hemodynamics. Mice have emerged as a critical animal model for studying effects of hypertension and much has been learned. Regardless of the specific mouse model, data on changes in cardiac function and hemodynamics are necessarily measured under anesthesia. Here, we present a new experimental-computational workflow to estimate awake cardiovascular conditions from anesthetized data, which was then used to quantify effects of chronic angiotensin II-induced hypertension relative to normotension in wild-type mice. We found that isoflurane anesthesia had a greater impact on depressing hemodynamics in angiotensin II-infused mice than in controls, which led to unexpected results when comparing anesthetized results between the two groups of mice. Through comparison of the awake simulations, however, in vivo relevant effects of angiotensin II-infusion on global and regional vascular structure, properties, and hemodynamics were found to be qualitatively consistent with expectations. Specifically, we found an increased in vivo vascular stiffness in the descending thoracic aorta and suprarenal abdominal aorta, leading to increases in pulse pressure in the distal aorta. These insights allow characterization of the impact of regionally varying vascular remodeling on hemodynamics and mouse-to-mouse variations due to induced hypertension.

Tri-layered constitutive modelling unveils functional differences between the pig ascending and lower thoracic aorta.

The arterial wall's tri-layered macroscopic and layer-specific microscopic structure determine its mechanical properties, which vary at different arterial locations. Combining layer-specific mechanical data and tri-layered modelling, this study aimed to characterise functional differences between the pig ascending (AA) and lower thoracic aorta (LTA). AA and LTA segments were obtained for n=9 pigs. For each location, circumferentially and axially oriented intact wall and isolated layer strips were tested uniaxially and the layer-specific mechanical response modelled using a hyperelastic strain energy function. Then, layer-specific constitutive relations and intact wall mechanical data were combined to develop a tri-layered model of an AA and LTA cylindrical vessel, accounting for the layer-specific residual stresses. AA and LTA behaviours were then characterised for in vivo pressure ranges while stretched axially to in vivo length. The media dominated the AA response, bearing>2/3 of the circumferential load both at physiological (100 mmHg) and hypertensive pressures (160 mmHg). The LTA media bore most of the circumferential load at physiological pressure only (57±7% at 100 mmHg), while adventitia and media load bearings were comparable at 160 mmHg. Furthermore, increased axial elongation affected the media/adventitia load-bearing only at the LTA. The pig AA and LTA presented strong functional differences, likely reflecting their different roles in the circulation. The media-dominated compliant and anisotropic AA stores large amounts of elastic energy in response to both circumferential and axial deformations, which maximises diastolic recoiling function. This function is reduced at the LTA, where the adventitia shields the artery against supra-physiological circumferential and axial loads.

Arterial Stiffness: Different Metrics, Different Meanings.

Findings from basic science and clinical studies agree that arterial stiffness is fundamental to both the mechanobiology and the biomechanics that dictate vascular health and disease. There is, therefore, an appropriately growing literature on arterial stiffness. Perusal of the literature reveals, however, that many different methods and metrics are used to quantify arterial stiffness, and reported values often differ by orders of magnitude and have different meanings. Without clear definitions and an understanding of possible inter-relations therein, it is increasingly difficult to integrate results from the literature to glean true understanding. In this paper, we briefly review methods that are used to infer values of arterial stiffness that span studies on isolated cells, excised intact vessels, and clinical assessments. We highlight similarities and differences and identify a single theoretical approach that can be used across scales and applications and thus could help to unify future results. We conclude by emphasizing the need to move toward a synthesis of many disparate reports, for only in this way will we be able to move from our current fragmented understanding to a true appreciation of how vascular cells maintain, remodel, or repair the arteries that are fundamental to cardiovascular properties and function.