Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
2.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 70(2): 325-59, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25355810

ABSTRACT

Infections related to implantable cardiac electronic devices (ICEDs), including pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, are increasing in incidence in the USA and are likely to increase in the UK, because more devices are being implanted. These devices have both intravascular and extravascular components and infection can involve the generator, device leads and native cardiac structures or various combinations. ICED infections can be life-threatening, particularly when associated with endocardial infection, and all-cause mortality of up to 35% has been reported. Like infective endocarditis, ICED infections can be difficult to diagnose and manage. This guideline aims to (i) improve the quality of care provided to patients with ICEDs, (ii) provide an educational resource for all relevant healthcare professionals, (iii) encourage a multidisciplinary approach to ICED infection management, (iv) promote a standardized approach to the diagnosis, management, surveillance and prevention of ICED infection through pragmatic evidence-rated recommendations, and (v) advise on future research projects/audit. The guideline is intended to assist in the clinical care of patients with suspected or confirmed ICED infection in the UK, to inform local infection prevention and treatment policies and guidelines and to be used in the development of educational and training material by the relevant professional societies. The questions covered by the guideline are presented at the beginning of each section.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices/adverse effects , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Disease Management , Humans
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 67(2): 269-89, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22086858

ABSTRACT

The BSAC guidelines on treatment of infectious endocarditis (IE) were last published in 2004. The guidelines presented here have been updated and extended to reflect developments in diagnostics, new trial data and the availability of new antibiotics. The aim of these guidelines, which cover both native valve and prosthetic valve endocarditis, is to standardize the initial investigation and treatment of IE. An extensive review of the literature using a number of different search criteria has been carried out and cited publications used to support any changes we have made to the existing guidelines. Publications referring to in vitro or animal models have only been cited if appropriate clinical data are not available. Randomized, controlled trials suitable for the development of evidenced-based guidelines in this area are still lacking and therefore a consensus approach has again been adopted for most recommendations; however, we have attempted to grade the evidence, where possible. The guidelines have also been extended by the inclusion of sections on clinical diagnosis, echocardiography and surgery.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy/methods , Endocarditis/diagnosis , Endocarditis/drug therapy , Animals , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Mycoses/diagnosis , Mycoses/drug therapy
4.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 63(5): 849-61, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19282331

ABSTRACT

These evidence-based guidelines are an updated version of those published in 2006. They have been produced after a literature review of the treatment and prophylaxis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The guidelines aim to complement those recently published for the antibiotic treatment of common and emerging community-onset MRSA infections in the UK. The guidelines have reviewed and updated, where appropriate, previous recommendations, taking into account any changes in the UK epidemiology of MRSA, ongoing national surveillance data and the value of new antistaphylococcal agents licensed for use in UK practice. Emerging therapies that have not been licensed for UK use are not reviewed, but their future potential role has been mentioned where deemed appropriate. Recommendations are given for the treatment of common infections caused by MRSA, elimination of MRSA from carriage sites and prophylaxis of surgical site infection.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Carrier State/drug therapy , Carrier State/prevention & control , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Carrier State/epidemiology , Carrier State/microbiology , Humans , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...