Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Virus Res ; 269: 197637, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31152757

ABSTRACT

Lumpy skin disease (LSD) is a viral transboundary disease endemic throughout Africa and of high economic importance that affects cattle and domestic water buffaloes. Since 2012, the disease has spread rapidly and widely throughout the Middle Eastern and Balkan regions, southern Caucasus and parts of the Russian Federation. Before vaccination campaigns took their full effect, the disease continued spreading from region to region, mainly showing seasonal patterns despite implementing control and eradication measures. The disease is capable of appearing several hundred kilometers away from initial (focal) outbreak sites within a short time period. These incursions have triggered a long-awaited renewed scientific interest in LSD resulting in the initiation of novel research into broad aspects of the disease, including epidemiology, modes of transmission and associated risk factors. Long-distance dispersal of LSDV seems to occur via the movement of infected animals, but distinct seasonal patterns indicate that arthropod-borne transmission is most likely responsible for the swift and aggressive short-distance spread of the disease. Elucidating the mechanisms of transmission of LSDV will enable the development of more targeted and effective actions for containment and eradication of the virus. The mode of vector-borne transmission of the disease is most likely mechanical, but there is no clear-cut evidence to confirm or disprove this assumption. To date, the most likely vectors for LSDV transmission are blood-sucking arthropods such as stable flies (Stomoxys calcitrans), mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti), and hard ticks (Rhipicephalus and Amblyomma species). New evidence suggests that the ubiquitous, synanthropic house fly, Musca domestica, may also play a role in LSDV transmission, but this has not yet been tested in a clinical setting. The aim of this review is to compile and discuss the earlier as well as the most recent research data on the transmission of LSDV.


Subject(s)
Arthropod Vectors/virology , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Lumpy Skin Disease/transmission , Lumpy skin disease virus/physiology , Animals , Cattle , Culicidae/virology , Houseflies/virology , Ixodidae/virology , Rhipicephalus/virology
2.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 66(3): 1332-1340, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30811855

ABSTRACT

Lumpy skin disease (LSD) has recently expanded its range northwards to include the Balkans, Turkey and Russia. Because there was no solid evidence conclusively verifying the transmission mechanism in the field and LSDV viraemic animals with overt and asymptomatic presentation of disease and their products may represent a risk as an indirect transmission pathway. In this work, we used PCR positivity and infectivity in clinical and subclinical infection to evaluate the safety of meat and offal products from cows infected with the virulent LSDV strain Russia/Dagestan/2015. At day 21 post infection, seven of the 12 animals developed the generalized disease, and four animals became subclinically infected without apparent clinical signs. Upon examination and necropsy, the animals with the generalized disease had skin lesions; noticeably enlarged lymph nodes; and lesions in the lungs, trachea and testicles; whereas subclinically ill animals exhibited only enlarged lymph nodes and fever. For both disease presentations, testing of skeletal meat by PCR and virus isolation showed that the skeletal meat did not contain live virus or viral genome, whereas in cattle with generalized disease, meat with gross pathology physically connected under the site of a skin lesion was positive for the live virus. In subclinical infection, only enlarged lymph nodes carried the infectious virus, while the other internal organs tested in both types of disease manifestation were negative except for the testicles. Overall, our findings demonstrate that clinically and subclinically infected animals are reservoirs of live LSDV in lymph nodes and testicles, whereas deep skeletal meat in both types of infection do not carry live virus and the risk of transmission through this product seems very low. The detection of LSDV in testicular tissues in subclinically ill animals is concerning because of the potential to spread infection through contaminated semen. This aspect requires reconsideration of surveillance programmes to identify these Trojan horses of LSDV infection.


Subject(s)
Disease Reservoirs/veterinary , Genome, Viral/genetics , Lumpy Skin Disease/virology , Lumpy skin disease virus/isolation & purification , Meat Products/virology , Red Meat/virology , Animals , Asymptomatic Infections , Balkan Peninsula , Cattle , Disease Reservoirs/virology , Female , Lumpy Skin Disease/pathology , Lumpy skin disease virus/genetics , Male , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Russia , Semen/virology , Testis/virology , Turkey
3.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 65(5): 1137-1144, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29932512

ABSTRACT

Since 2012, lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV) has been spreading from the Middle East to south-east Europe and Russia. Although vaccination campaigns have managed to contain LSDV outbreaks, the risk of further spread is still high. The most likely route of LSDV transmission in short distance spread is vector-borne. Several arthropod species have been suggested as potential vectors, but no proven vector has yet been identified. To check whether promiscuous-landing synanthropic flies such as the common housefly (Musca domestica) could be involved, we carried out entomological trapping at the site of a recent LSDV outbreak caused by a vaccine-like LSDV strain. The presence of vaccine-like LSDV DNA was confirmed by the assay developed herein, the assay by Agianniotaki et al. (2017) and RPO30 gene sequencing. No evidence of field LSDV strain circulation was revealed. In this study, we discovered that M. domestica flies carried vaccine-like LSDV DNA (Ct  > 25.5), whereas trapped stable flies from the same collection were negative for both field and vaccine LSDV. To check whether flies were contaminated internally and externally, 50 randomly selected flies from the same collection were washed four times and tested. Viral DNA was mainly detected in the 1st wash fluid, suggesting genome or even viral contamination on the insect cadaver. In this study, internal contamination in the insect bodies without differentiation between the body locations was also revealed; however, the clinical relevance for mechanical transmission is unknown. Further work is needed to clarify a role of M. domestica in the transmission of LSDV. To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating that an attenuated LSD vaccine strain has been identified in Russian cattle given the ban on the use of live attenuated vaccines against LSDV.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Houseflies/virology , Lumpy Skin Disease/epidemiology , Lumpy skin disease virus/isolation & purification , Animals , Cattle , DNA, Viral/genetics , Lumpy skin disease virus/genetics , Russia/epidemiology , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
4.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 65(6): 1514-1521, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29749049

ABSTRACT

In 2015, the lumpy skin disease virus spread throughout the Russian Federation. Following a modified stamping-out campaign, the disease re-emerged with a greater incidence across 16 regions of Southern and Central Russia. A total of 313 outbreaks were reported to OIE. The highest outbreak frequency was observed in the republics of Chechnya (108), Kalmykiya (57), and Ingushetiya (35). The disease cases predominantly occurred in June and July 2016, starting from May to December; however, no association between outbreaks and altitudes was identified (p > .05). Samples taken from infected cattle were subjected to PCR analysis, which identified the genome of the virus most frequently in skin nodules (78%), nasal swabs (23.4%), blood (13%) and sera (14.5%). Interestingly, LSDV genome was occasionally identified in lung and milk samples. Based on the PRO30 sequence analysis, lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV) strains circulating in Russia were all identical and fell within the cluster of field LSDV found worldwide.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Lumpy Skin Disease/epidemiology , Lumpy skin disease virus/isolation & purification , Animals , Cattle , Genome, Viral/genetics , Incidence , Lumpy Skin Disease/virology , Lumpy skin disease virus/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Russia/epidemiology
5.
J Vector Ecol ; 39(2): 306-15, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25424259

ABSTRACT

Culicoides biting midges play an important role in the epidemiology of many vector-borne infections, including bluetongue virus, an internationally important virus of ruminants. The territory of the Russian Federation includes regions with diverse climatic conditions and a wide range of habitats suitable for Culicoides. This review summarizes available data on Culicoides studied in the Russian Federation covering geographically different regions, as well as findings from adjacent countries. Previous literature on species composition, ranges of dominant species, breeding sites, and host preferences is reviewed and suggestions made for future studies to elucidate vector-virus relationships.


Subject(s)
Diptera/virology , Animals , Bluetongue virus/pathogenicity , Insect Vectors/virology , Russia , Seasons
6.
Avian Pathol ; 41(5): 459-63, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22967203

ABSTRACT

A total of 79 liver samples from clinically sick and asymptomatic chickens were tested for avian hepatitis E virus (aHEV). Samples were received from 19 farms, five of which tested positive with primers targeting the ORF2 capsid gene. The phylogenetic analysis of a 242-base-pair fragment demonstrated that the Russian aHEV isolates share between 78.2 and 96.2% over the fragment sequenced, whereas the nucleotide sequence identities between the Russian isolates and the other representatives from GeneBank varied from 76.3 to 96.2%. The homology between the studied hepatitis E viruses and swine hepatitis E virus varied between 46.9 to 48.1%. The most divergent isolate aHEV16050 showed homology of 82.6% as compared with the strains in the dendrogram. The three positive hepatitis E virus samples (aHEV16279, aHEV16050 and aHEV18196) did not cluster with the European genotype 3 as expected due to the close location of Russia to Europe, nor did they with the other two genotypes, separating to a distinct branch. The aHEV16211 grouped together with European and Chinese isolates, and the aHEV18198 with Canadian ones.


Subject(s)
Chickens , Hepatitis, Viral, Animal/virology , Hepevirus/genetics , Poultry Diseases/virology , RNA Virus Infections/veterinary , Animals , Base Sequence , DNA Primers/genetics , Genetic Drift , Genetic Variation , Genotype , Hepevirus/isolation & purification , Liver/virology , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , RNA Virus Infections/virology , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Russia , Sequence Analysis, DNA/veterinary , Viral Proteins/genetics
7.
Avian Dis ; 54(2): 899-904, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20608536

ABSTRACT

The genetic diversity of the pvpA gene of Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) samples originating from commercial chickens was investigated. In the present study, we evaluated the genetic variability of 26 field samples of MG detected in commercial chickens and turkeys from 18 regions of Russia and compared them to the reference strains of MG available in GenBank. Genetic variability was evaluated by partial nucleotide sequencing of the pvpA gene, which encodes a putative cytadhesin protein. Comparisons with MG strains and isolates from the United States, Australia, China, and Iran using sequence analysis of PCR products showed that Russian MG field samples clustered more closely to each other than to the international reference MG strains. The MG pvpA sequences were found to be highly variable with a discrimination index of 0.975 for Russian field samples. No apparent cluster was found using the criteria of year or location of detection. DNA sequence polymorphism and size variation in the pvpA gene were shown among the Russian MG field samples and could be used for MG typing. These findings might help better understand the relationship among MG isolates from Russia and other countries.


Subject(s)
Adhesins, Bacterial/genetics , Genetic Variation , Mycoplasma Infections/veterinary , Mycoplasma gallisepticum/genetics , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Animals , Base Sequence , Chickens , Molecular Sequence Data , Mycoplasma Infections/epidemiology , Mycoplasma Infections/microbiology , Mycoplasma gallisepticum/isolation & purification , Phylogeny , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Russia/epidemiology , Turkeys
8.
Avian Pathol ; 39(2): 99-109, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20390544

ABSTRACT

In this study, we report the development and validation of a duplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with an internal control using TaqMan-labelled probes for the detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae (duplex MGMS PCR). The MGMS PCR was highly specific with a sensitivity of 7 and 1 colony-forming units/ml for M. gallisepticum and M. synoviae, respectively, using dilution of pure culture that corresponds to 34 and 29 DNA copies per reaction. Validation of the assay was completed with 260 and 27 pooled samples (tracheal swabs) from commercial chickens and turkeys, respectively, with potential M. gallisepticum and M. synoviae involvement and 42 samples (palatine cleft swabs) from backyard geese and ducks. Using isolation as the gold standard, the MGMS PCR was more sensitive than isolation and the analytical sensitivity was 0.944 and 0.958 for M. gallisepticum and M. synoviae, respectively. In comparison with a gapA-based assay (gapA PCR) and a 16S rRNA-based assay (16S PCR) for M. gallisepticum and M. synoviae, respectively, the results agreed for 94.5% and 96.6%, respectively. The use of the internal control allowed monitoring of proper extraction and inhibition of amplification that was detected in 12 samples. The duplex MGMS PCR was shown to be superior to the presently reported real-time PCR assays in terms of combination of sensitivity, specificity and capacity of detection of more than one target in a single tube. In conclusion, the duplex MGMS PCR was highly specific, sensitive, and reproducible and could be used on clinical samples from commercial chickens, turkeys and backyard poultry including ducks and geese.


Subject(s)
Mycoplasma Infections/veterinary , Mycoplasma gallisepticum/isolation & purification , Mycoplasma synoviae/isolation & purification , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Animals , Chickens , Colony Count, Microbial , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Molecular Probe Techniques , Mycoplasma Infections/microbiology , Mycoplasma gallisepticum/genetics , Mycoplasma synoviae/genetics , RNA, Bacterial/genetics , Reproducibility of Results , Turkeys
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...