Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int Nurs Rev ; 63(2): 208-17, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26748996

ABSTRACT

AIM: We explored how selected 'positive deviant' healthcare facilities in Bosnia and Herzegovina approach the continuous development, adaptation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of nursing-related standard operating procedures. BACKGROUND: Standardized nursing care is internationally recognized as a critical element of safe, high-quality health care; yet very little research has examined one of its key instruments: nursing-related standard operating procedures. INTRODUCTION: Despite variability in Bosnia and Herzegovina's healthcare and nursing care quality, we assumed that some healthcare facilities would have developed effective strategies to elevate nursing quality and safety through the use of standard operating procedures. METHODS: Guided by the 'positive deviance' approach, we used a multiple-case study design to examine a criterion sample of four facilities (two primary healthcare centres and two hospitals), collecting data via focus groups and individual interviews. FINDINGS: In each studied facility, certification/accreditation processes were crucial to the initiation of continuous development, adaptation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of nursing-related SOPs. In one hospital and one primary healthcare centre, nurses working in advanced roles (i.e. quality coordinators) were responsible for developing and implementing nursing-related standard operating procedures. Across the four studied institutions, we identified a consistent approach to standard operating procedures-related processes. CONCLUSIONS: The certification/accreditation process is enabling necessary changes in institutions' organizational cultures, empowering nurses to take on advanced roles in improving the safety and quality of nursing care. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICY: Standardizing nursing procedures is key to improve the safety and quality of nursing care. Nursing and Health Policy are needed in Bosnia and Herzegovina to establish a functioning institutional framework, including regulatory bodies, educational systems for developing nurses' capacities or the inclusion of nursing-related standard operating procedures in certification/accreditation standards.


Subject(s)
Nursing Care/standards , Quality of Health Care , Accreditation , Bosnia and Herzegovina , Delivery of Health Care , Health Policy , Humans
2.
Springerplus ; 3: 319, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25077056

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Young people face many barriers in accessing health services that are responsive to their needs. The World Health Organization has led a call to develop services that address these barriers, i.e. youth-friendly health services. Addressing the needs of young people is one of the priorities of Foundation fami, an organisation working in collaboration with the Swiss Federal Department of Development and Cooperation and Geneva University Hospitals to develop quality family medicine services in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This paper describes the design of a trial to assess the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention involving family medicine teams (primary care doctors and nurses) to improve the youth-friendliness of family medicine services in Bosnia and Herzegovina. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a stratified cluster randomised trial with a repeated cross-sectional design involving 59 health services in 10 municipalities of the canton of Zenica in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Municipalities were the unit of randomisation: five municipalities were randomised to the intervention arm and five to a wait-list control arm. Family medicine teams in the intervention arm were invited to participate in an interactive training program about youth-friendly service principles and change processes within their service. The primary outcome was the youth-friendliness of the primary care service measured using the YFHS-WHO + questionnaire, a validated tool which young people aged 15 to 24 years complete following a family medicine consultation. A total of 600 young people aged 15 to 24 years were invited to participate and complete the YFHS-WHO + questionnaire: 300 (30 per municipality) at baseline, and 300 at follow-up, three to five months after the training program. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial should provide much awaited evidence about the development of youth-friendly primary care services and inform their further development both in Bosnia and Herzegovina and worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry_ ACTRN12610000142033.

3.
J Adolesc Health ; 51(5): 422-30, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23084162

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a research tool to measure the youth friendliness of primary care services from a client's perspective. METHODS: The questionnaire was initially developed in English, but as it was to be used in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), it was validated in the language of this country. Items were adapted from two sources: a reproductive health services quality improvement questionnaire from the World Health Organization, and an Australian survey used to assess youth-friendly primary care services. An English-speaking international panel reviewed the list of items for face validity. After translation-back translation, the questionnaire was pretested with adolescent patients from a family practice in BiH. The stability and construct validation were then conducted with 60 young people from six different health services in BiH. Items for the final questionnaire were selected using item response theory. RESULTS: The validation and item response analysis led to a 49-item tool. Test-retest stability at 1 week was excellent (mean κ: .93). Construct validation was supported by the fact that services with the highest and the lowest scores on the questionnaire were also those that had many and few, respectively, youth-friendly characteristics, as assessed by experts, on a predefined evaluation grid. Services seeing a higher proportion of adolescents also had higher scores on the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the validity of the YFHS-WHO+ questionnaire for assessing the level of youth friendliness of family medicine services for research purposes. Further validations in English and French will allow wider use of this tool in the future.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Health Services/standards , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Primary Health Care/standards , Adolescent , Bosnia and Herzegovina , Child , Communication Barriers , Confidentiality , Female , Humans , Language , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...